Hyperbaric Versus Plain Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

BACKGROUND:Bupivacaine is an amide local anesthetic used in hyperbaric and plain forms administered as spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. In this systematic review, we summarized the effectiveness and safety of hyperbaric versus plain bupivacaine in providing anesthesia for cesarean delivery. We considered the adequacy of anesthesia for completion of cesarean delivery and the need for interventions to treat complications. METHODS:We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases. We imposed no language restriction. We included all randomized controlled trials involving patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery that compared the use of hyperbaric bupivacaine with plain bupivacaine. RESULTS:We included 6 studies with a total of 394 patients in this review. These studies have small sample size, few observed events, differences in methodology, and insufficient information pertaining to assessment of risk of bias. This prevented us from calculating pooled estimates. Results show that there is no compelling evidence in favor of the use of intrathecal plain or hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. CONCLUSIONS:There is a lack of clear evidence regarding the superiority of hyperbaric compared with plain bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. The need for conversion to general anesthesia because of failed spinal anesthesia is an important clinical outcome, but current data are insufficient to compare spinal anesthesia induced with hyperbaric compared with plain bupivacaine for this outcome. Further research is required.

[1]  F. Siddiqui,et al.  Use of hyperbaric versus isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  J. Higgins.  Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2011 .

[3]  R. Mori,et al.  Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08 , 2010, The Lancet.

[4]  J. Kingdom,et al.  Complications of Exteriorized Compared With In Situ Uterine Repair at Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  M. Vercauteren,et al.  The Sitting Versus Right Lateral Position During Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: Block Characteristics and Severity of Hypotension , 2006, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Obstetric Anesthesia Workforce Survey: Twenty-year Update , 2005 .

[7]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey: twenty-year update. , 2005, Anesthesiology.

[8]  M. Columb,et al.  The Effect of Posture and Baricity on the Spread of Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Elective Cesarean Delivery , 2005, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[9]  E. Lew,et al.  Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia Using Epidural Volume Extension Leads to Faster Motor Recovery After Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study , 2004, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[10]  José Francisco Nunes Pereira das Neves,et al.  Raquianestesia para cesárea: estudio comparativo entre bupivacaína isobárica e hiperbárica asociadas a la morfina , 2003 .

[11]  José Francisco Nunes Pereira das Neves,et al.  Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: comparative study between isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine associated to morphine. , 2003, Revista brasileira de anestesiologia.

[12]  B. Haglund,et al.  Deliveries, mothers and newborn infants in Sweden, 1973–2000 , 2003, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[13]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  R. Fernando,et al.  DOES DENSITY INFLUENCE THE SPREAD OF INTRATHECAL BUPIVACAINE IN THE PROLONGED SITTING POSITION BEFORE ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTION?: P‐69 , 2002 .

[15]  G. McLeod,et al.  Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section with bupivacaine 5 mg ml(-1) in glucose 8 or 80 mg ml(-1). , 2001, British journal of anaesthesia.

[16]  U. Udomsubpayakul,et al.  Epidemic of Cesarean Section at the General, Private and University Hospitals in Thailand , 2000, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[17]  K. Korttila,et al.  Comparison of 9 mg of intrathecal plain and hyperbaric bupivacaine both with fentanyl for cesarean delivery. , 1999, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[18]  C. Johnson,et al.  Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: isobaric versus hyperbaric solution. , 1999, Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica.

[19]  M. Richardson,et al.  Intrathecal Hypobaric Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with Morphine for Cesarean Section , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[20]  L. Tsen,et al.  General anesthesia for cesarean section at a tertiary care hospital 1990-1995: indications and implications. , 1998, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[21]  V. Saldien,et al.  Small-Dose Hyperbaric Versus Plain Bupivacaine During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[22]  H. King,et al.  Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section: Isobaric vs Hyperbaric Solution , 1997, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[23]  M. Echevarría,et al.  [Effect of the local anesthetic on visceral pain in cesarean sections done under intradural anesthesia]. , 1996, Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion.

[24]  P. Vichitvejpaisal,et al.  A comparative study of isobaric and hyperbaric solution of bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in caesarean section. , 1992, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[25]  A. Forster,et al.  Comparison of Hypobaric, Hyperbaric, and Isobaric Solutions of Bupivacaine During Continuous Spinal Anesthesia , 1991, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[26]  I. Russell,et al.  Subarachnoid analgesia for caesarean section. A double-blind comparison of plain and hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine. , 1987, British journal of anaesthesia.

[27]  I. W. Møller,et al.  Subarachnoid anaesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine: effects of density. , 1984, British journal of anaesthesia.

[28]  D. Phelan,et al.  A Comparison of Hyper- and Isobaric Solutions of Bupivacaine for Subarachnoid Block , 1984, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[29]  I. Russell.  Intrathecal bupivacaine 0.5% for Caesarean section , 1982, Anaesthesia.

[30]  W. Chambers,et al.  Effect of baricity on spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine. , 1981, British journal of anaesthesia.