Contextual Factors for Aging Well: Creating Socially Engaging Spaces Through the Use of Deliberative Dialogues

Purpose of the Study Home and community engagement are key contextual factors for aging well, particularly for older adults in vulnerable social positions. A community-based participatory action research project conducted in Western Canada examined how to best use the shared amenity spaces in a low-income seniors' apartment complex in order to connect services and programs with tenants and to provide opportunities for service providers and local stakeholders to build upon and create new relationships toward collaboration and service delivery. Design and Methods Pre-move deliberative dialogue workshops (n = 4) were conducted with stakeholders (e.g., service providers, developers, and municipal government employees). Workshop participants (n = 24) generated ideas and plans on how physical and social environments can contribute to the social engagement of senior tenants. Results Shared dialogue led to community investment and asset sharing by integrating the knowledge and experiences of multiple stakeholder groups into the planning process. This article highlights how collaborative planning approaches for the effective use of the social environment (e.g., social programming), within the physical environment (e.g., amenity and community spaces), can generate rich and illuminating data for informing enhancements in the social environment of apartment dwelling low-income seniors. Contextual challenges to service provision are discussed, including the need for communication about and coordination of on-site programming, culturally diverse and responsive programming, and long-term funding. Implications Prolonging independent community living with the assistance of support services should be a goal to both delay premature relocation into institutional care and meet the preferences of older adults.

[1]  Sojung Park,et al.  Aging in Place of Vulnerable Older Adults: Person–Environment Fit Perspective , 2017, Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society.

[2]  Alex Mihailidis,et al.  Principles for fostering the transdisciplinary development of assistive technologies , 2017, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[3]  A. Sixsmith,et al.  Aging well @ home: An Implementation and Sustainability Plan , 2017 .

[4]  A. Sixsmith,et al.  Ageing well in the right place: partnership working with older people , 2017 .

[5]  A. Sixsmith,et al.  Place-making with older persons: Establishing sense-of-place through participatory community mapping workshops. , 2016, Social science & medicine.

[6]  Catherine Leviten-Reid,et al.  Building Affordable Rental Housing for Seniors: Policy Insights From Canada , 2016 .

[7]  Jayne Wallace,et al.  Placing in Age: Transitioning to a New Home in Later Life , 2017 .

[8]  Donald C Cole,et al.  Analyzing Data Generated Through Deliberative Dialogue , 2015, Qualitative Health Research.

[9]  J. Minnery,et al.  Understanding Daily Life of Older People in a Residential Complex: The Contribution of Lefebvre's Social Space , 2013 .

[10]  A. Rosso,et al.  The Urban Built Environment and Mobility in Older Adults: A Comprehensive Review , 2011, Journal of aging research.

[11]  Philip W. Brickner,et al.  There's No Place Like Home: Place and Care in an Ageing Society , 2016 .

[12]  L. Weeks,et al.  Housing Concerns of Vulnerable Older Canadians* , 2010, Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement.

[13]  G. Bramley,et al.  Urban Form and Social Sustainability: The Role of Density and Housing Type , 2009 .

[14]  Karen M. Gibler,et al.  Aging Subsidized Housing Residents: A Growing Problem in U.S. Cities , 2007 .

[15]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[16]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  A long-term perspective on person-environment fit and ADL dependence among older Swedish adults. , 2005, The Gerontologist.

[17]  D. Alley,et al.  Homes of Choice: Towards More Effective Linkages Between Housing and Services , 2005 .

[18]  D. Redfoot,et al.  Targeting Services to Those Most at Risk , 2005 .

[19]  D. Alley,et al.  Homes of Choice , 2005, Policy brief (Center for Home Care Policy and Research (U.S.)).

[20]  M. Minkler Ethical Challenges for the “Outside” Researcher in Community-Based Participatory Research , 2004, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[21]  Gerben Helleman,et al.  The renewal of what was tomorrow's idealistic city: Amsterdam's Bijlmermeer high-rise , 2004 .

[22]  G. Evans,et al.  Health and Social Outcomes of Moving to a Continuing Care Retirement Community , 2003 .

[23]  Colin Sharp Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.) , 2003 .

[24]  Robyn A. Findlay Interventions to reduce social isolation amongst older people: where is the evidence? , 2003, Ageing and Society.

[25]  L. Hawkley,et al.  Social Isolation and Health, with an Emphasis on Underlying Mechanisms , 2003, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[26]  H. Boeije A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparative Method in the Analysis of Qualitative Interviews , 2002 .

[27]  M. McCoy,et al.  Deliberative Dialogue to Expand Civic Engagement: What Kind of Talk Does Democracy Need? , 2002 .

[28]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[29]  M. Polk Transdisciplinary co-production: Designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving , 2015 .

[30]  B. Spillman,et al.  Housing as a Platform for Improving Outcomes for Older Renters , 2012 .

[31]  K N Lohr,et al.  Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence. , 2004, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[32]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .