Correlation of the polymer hydrophilicity and membrane fabrication process on the properties of asymmetric membranes in a vapor-induced phase-inversion process

In this study, we sought a better understanding of how the hydrophilicity of a polymer affects the morphology and performance of membranes. Three types of polymer with different hydrophilicity solution systems were considered: poly(aryl ether ketone) bearing a hydroxyl group (PEK–OH-100) with N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF); poly(aryl ether ketone) bearing a 50% fraction hydroxyl group with DMF, and cardo poly(aryl ether ketone) with DMF. These systems were used to investigate the evolution of the morphology and variation in performance versus a change in the hydrophilicity of the polymer. In addition, the fundamental thermodynamic influence of the solution systems on the phase-inversion process was investigated by cloud-point measurement and Hansen solubility parameter theory to determine the role of polymer hydrophilicity on the stability of the polymer solution in humid surroundings. The performance of the membranes was tested via testing of the pure water flux, porosity, and rejection of bovine serum albumin (BSA) with respect to variations in the polymer hydrophilicity, evaporation time, relative humidity, and molecular weight of the polymer. The resulting optimal membrane exhibited a flux of 329.3 L m−2 h−1 and a 99.3% rejection of BSA at a relative humidity of 90% and an evaporation time of 3 s. The hydrophilic PEK–OH-100 membranes have promising applications in protein separation and the porous support of reverse-osmosis membranes and so on. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 44701.

[1]  E. Drioli,et al.  Understanding the non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) effect during the fabrication of microporous PVDF membranes via thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) , 2016 .

[2]  Rong Wang,et al.  Influence of macromolecular additive on reinforced flat-sheet thin film composite pressure-retarded osmosis membranes , 2016 .

[3]  Qifeng Zhang,et al.  Antifouling ultrafiltration membrane fabricated from poly (arylene ether ketone) bearing hydrophilic hydroxyl groups , 2016 .

[4]  I. Vankelecom,et al.  Understanding and guiding the phase inversion process for synthesis of solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes , 2015 .

[5]  Wentao Yan,et al.  Improving permeability and antifouling performance of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membrane by incorporation of ZnO-DMF dispersion containing nano-ZnO and polyvinylpyrrolidone , 2015 .

[6]  Lianjun Wang,et al.  Polyethyleneimine, an effective additive for polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membrane with enhanced permeability and selectivity , 2015 .

[7]  P. Z. Çulfaz-Emecen,et al.  Preparation of patterned microfiltration membranes and their performance in crossflow yeast filtration , 2015 .

[8]  I. Vankelecom,et al.  Integrally skinned PSf-based SRNF‐membranes prepared via phase inversion—Part B: Influence of low molecular weight additives , 2014 .

[9]  G. Koeckelberghs,et al.  Synthesis of modified poly(ether ether ketone) polymer for the preparation of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes via phase inversion , 2013 .

[10]  I. Vankelecom,et al.  The influence of polymer purity and molecular weight on the synthesis of integrally skinned polysulfone membranes , 2013 .

[11]  W. Saeys,et al.  Study of polymer concentration and evaporation time as phase inversion parameters for polysulfone-based SRNF membranes , 2013 .

[12]  Li-ping Zhu,et al.  Improving the hydrophilicity and fouling-resistance of polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes via surface zwitterionicalization mediated by polysulfone-based triblock copolymer additive , 2013 .

[13]  R. Kaner,et al.  Direct microscopic observation of membrane formation by nonsolvent induced phase separation , 2013 .

[14]  M. N. Karim,et al.  Preparation of poly(phthalazinone-ether-sulfone) sponge-like ultrafiltration membrane. , 2013, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[15]  Jason Wu,et al.  High durable PEK-based anion exchange membrane for elevated temperature alkaline fuel cells , 2012 .

[16]  A. Livingston,et al.  The effect of membrane formation parameters on performance of polyimide membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN): Part A. Effect of polymer/solvent/non-solvent system choice , 2011 .

[17]  Rong Wang,et al.  Effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) as an additive on the fabrication of polyvinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluropropylene (PVDF-HFP) asymmetric microporous hollow fiber membranes , 2011 .

[18]  T. Kyu,et al.  Membrane morphology and phase diagrams of mangiferin modified poly(amide)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) bl , 2011 .

[19]  Liuqing Shi,et al.  Effect of Polyethersulfone Molecular Weight on Structure and Performance of Ultrafiltration Membranes , 2010 .

[20]  M. Ulbricht,et al.  High performance polyethersulfone microfiltration membranes having high flux and stable hydrophilic property , 2009 .

[21]  J. Lai,et al.  Interplay of mass transfer, phase separation, and membrane morphology in vapor-induced phase separation , 2009 .

[22]  A. Ghosh,et al.  Impacts of support membrane structure and chemistry on polyamide–polysulfone interfacial composite membranes , 2009 .

[23]  I. Vankelecom,et al.  High throughput study of phase inversion parameters for polyimide-based SRNF membranes , 2009 .

[24]  Peiyi Wu,et al.  An experimental investigation of evaporation time and the relative humidity on a novel positively charged ultrafiltration membrane via dry–wet phase inversion , 2009 .

[25]  Juin-Yih Lai,et al.  A top surface liquid layer during membrane formation using vapor-induced phase separation (VIPS)-Evidence and mechanism of formation , 2008 .

[26]  A. Ghoshal,et al.  Effect of molecular weight of PEG on membrane morphology and transport properties , 2008 .

[27]  A. Ismail,et al.  Fabrication, fouling and foulant analyses of asymmetric polysulfone (PSF) ultrafiltration membrane fouled with natural organic matter (NOM) source waters , 2007 .

[28]  Q. Nguyen,et al.  Surface modification of cardo polyetherketone ultrafiltration membrane by photo-grafted copolymers to obtain nanofiltration membranes , 2007 .

[29]  Peng Wang,et al.  The relationship between porosity and kinetics parameter of membrane formation in PSF ultrafiltration membrane , 2006 .

[30]  Qing-rui Wang,et al.  Poly(vinylidene fluoride)/polyethersulfone blend membranes: Effects of solvent sort, polyethersulfone and polyvinylpyrrolidone concentration on their properties and morphology , 2006 .

[31]  Da-Ming Wang,et al.  Morphology control of polysulfone hollow fiber membranes via water vapor induced phase separation , 2006 .

[32]  B. Van der Bruggen,et al.  Study of the characteristics and the performance of self-made nanoporous polyethersulfone membranes , 2006 .

[33]  A. Mchugh,et al.  Modeling and simulation of nonsolvent vapor-induced phase separation , 2006 .

[34]  H. Tan,et al.  A novel nanofiltration membrane prepared with PAMAM and TMC by in situ interfacial polymerization on PEK-C ultrafiltration membrane , 2006 .

[35]  Fan Xu,et al.  Nanofiltration membrane prepared from cardo polyetherketone ultrafiltration membrane by UV-induced grafting method , 2005 .

[36]  Da-Ming Wang,et al.  Effect of temperature and span series surfactant on the structure of polysulfone membranes , 2002 .

[37]  Myeong-Jin Han,et al.  Thermodynamic and rheological variation in polysulfone solution by PVP and its effect in the preparation of phase inversion membrane , 2002 .

[38]  T. Young,et al.  The formation mechanism of membranes prepared from the crystalline EVAL polymer-water (nonsolvent)-2-propanol (nonsolvent) system , 1999 .

[39]  Y. Kang,et al.  Membrane formation by water vapor induced phase inversion , 1999 .

[40]  C. A. Smolders,et al.  MASS TRANSFER AND THERMODYNAMICS DURING IMMERSION PRECIPITATION FOR A TWO-POLYMER SYSTEM : EVALUATION WITH THE SYSTEM PES-PVP-NMP-WATER , 1994 .

[41]  N. Hilal,et al.  A review on membrane fabrication: Structure, properties and performance relationship , 2013 .