High Fidelity Simulation of the Spray Generated by a Realistic Swirling Flow Injector

Practical aero-engine fuel injection systems are highly complicated, combining complex fuel atomizer and air swirling elements to achieve good fuel-air mixing as well as long residence time in order to enhance both combustion efficiency and stability. While detailed understanding of the multiphase flow processes occurring in a realistic injector has been limited due to the complex geometries and the challenges in near-field measurements, high fidelity, first principles simulation offers, for the first time, the potential for a comprehensive physics-based understanding. In this work, such simulations have been performed to investigate the spray atomization and subsequent droplet transport in a swirling air stream generated by a complex multi-nozzle/swirler combination. A Coupled Level Set and Volume Of Fluid (CLSVOF) approach is used to directly capture the liquid-gas interface and an embedded boundary (EB) method is applied to flexibly handle the complex injector geometry. The ghost fluid (GF) method is also used to facilitate simulations at realistic fuel-air density ratio. Adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) and Lagrangian droplet models are used to efficiently resolve the multi-scale processes. To alleviate the global constraint on the time-step imposed by locally activated AMR near liquid jets, a separate AMR simulation focusing on jet atomization was performed for relatively short physical time and the resulting Lagrangian droplets are coupled into another simulation on a uniform grid at larger time-steps. The high cost simulations were performed at the U.S. Department of Defense high performance computing facilities using over 5000 processors. Experiments at the same flow conditions were conducted at UTRC. The simulation details of flow velocity and vorticity due to the interaction of the fuel jet and swirling air are presented. The velocity magnitude is compared with experimental measurement at two downstream planes. The two-phase spray spreading is compared with experimental images and the flow details are further analyzed to enhance understanding of the complex physics.Copyright © 2013 by ASME and United Technologies Corporation

[1]  M. Arienti,et al.  Time-resolved proper orthogonal decomposition of liquid jet dynamics , 2009 .

[2]  G. Faeth,et al.  Breakup of round nonturbulent liquid jets in gaseous crossflow , 2004 .

[3]  Z. Dai,et al.  PRIMARY BREAKUP OF NONTURBULENT ROUND LIQUID JETS IN GAS CROSSFLOWS , 1999 .

[4]  D. Juric,et al.  A front-tracking method for the computations of multiphase flow , 2001 .

[5]  J. Sethian,et al.  LEVEL SET METHODS FOR FLUID INTERFACES , 2003 .

[6]  Mark Sussman,et al.  A sharp interface method for incompressible two-phase flows , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[7]  M. Arienti,et al.  Towards an Efficient, High-Fidelity Methodology for Liquid Jet Atomization Computations , 2010 .

[8]  John B. Mcvey,et al.  High-resolution patternator for the characterization of fuel sprays , 1987 .

[9]  Ronald Fedkiw,et al.  A Boundary Condition Capturing Method for Multiphase Incompressible Flow , 2000, J. Sci. Comput..

[10]  Marcus Herrmann,et al.  Detailed Numerical Simulations of the Primary Atomization of a Turbulent Liquid Jet , 2007 .

[11]  S. Zaleski,et al.  DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF FREE-SURFACE AND INTERFACIAL FLOW , 1999 .

[12]  Marcus Herrmann,et al.  Modeling Wall Film Formation and Breakup Using an Integrated Interface-Tracking/Discrete-Phase Approach , 2011 .

[13]  T. J. Rosfjord,et al.  Influences on the Sprays Formed by High-Shear Fuel Nozzle/S wirler Assemblies , 1993 .

[14]  Joseph A. Schetz,et al.  Penetration and Breakup of Liquids in Subsonic Airstreams , 1977 .

[15]  A. Nejad,et al.  Breakup Processes of Liquid Jets in Subsonic Crossflows , 1996 .

[16]  Marcus Herrmann,et al.  A parallel Eulerian interface tracking/Lagrangian point particle multi-scale coupling procedure , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[17]  Mark Sussman,et al.  The Numerical Simulation of Ship Waves using Cartesian Grid Methods , 2014, 1410.1952.

[18]  M. Arienti,et al.  Liquid Film Formation by an Impinging Jet in a High- Velocity Air Stream , 2009 .

[19]  R. Fedkiw,et al.  A Boundary Condition Capturing Method for Poisson's Equation on Irregular Domains , 2000 .

[20]  Takehiro Himeno,et al.  Numerical Analysis for Propellant Management in Rocket Tanks , 2005 .

[21]  P. Colella,et al.  A Conservative Adaptive Projection Method for the Variable Density Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations , 1998 .

[22]  M. Soteriou,et al.  Prediction of High Density-Ratio Liquid Jet Atomization in Crossflow Using High Fidelity Simulations on HPC , 2012 .

[23]  Marcus Herrmann,et al.  A balanced force refined level set grid method for two-phase flows on unstructured flow solver grids , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[24]  C. Hassa,et al.  Breakup and atomization of a kerosene jet in crossflow at elevated pressure , 2002 .

[25]  M. Herrmann.  The influence of density ratio on the primary atomization of a turbulent liquid jet in crossflow , 2010 .

[26]  M. Berger,et al.  Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations , 1982 .

[27]  M. Arienti,et al.  The Impact of Density Ratio on the Liquid Core Dynamics of a Turbulent Liquid Jet Injected Into a Crossflow , 2011 .

[28]  M. Arienti,et al.  High-Fidelity Simulation of Atomization and Evaporation in a Liquid Jet in Cross-flow , 2011 .