The effect of tissue condition and applied load on Vickers hardness of human trabecular bone.

Hardness of trabecular human bone, evaluated by microindentation testing, has generally been measured on embedded tissues. It was known that this was not ideal but it had been preferred to other conditions (e.g. wet or dehydrated) as the trabeculae could withstand the applied load and the measurements were reliable. The aim of this study was to investigate if the tissue condition of the specimen and the applied load would alter the hardness values measured by Vickers microindentation. Vickers hardness values of human trabecular bone from the femoral head, prepared in three different ways (wet, dry and embedded) and tested with two different loads (50 and 25 gf), were measured. No significant difference was found between the two different loads. However, in several cases the 50 gf indentations had to be redone because they were too large or the trabecula broke locally. Even if the outlines of the indentations on wet bone were slightly less marked than the ones done on dehydrated or embedded bone, it was possible to measure the hardness. Significant differences of Vickers hardness values were found between the three preparations: the hardness increased passing from wet to dried (10%) and from wet to embedded (35%). Whereas the variation coefficient of the three tissue conditions were comparable. In conclusion, it is recommended to test human trabecular bone in a wet condition as it better represents the in vivo condition. Furthermore the use of a 25 gf load is suggested, allowing hardness measurements on almost all trabeculae without breaking them.

[1]  J. Currey,et al.  Mechanical properties of microcallus in human cancellous bone , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  C. Turner,et al.  The Effect of Fluoride Treatment on Bone Mineral in Rabbits , 1999, Calcified Tissue International.

[3]  J. Currey,et al.  Hardness, an indicator of the mechanical competence of cancellous bone , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  G. Pharr,et al.  Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[5]  F. Linde,et al.  The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  D. McNally,et al.  Microhardness anisotropy of lamellar bone. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  J. Currey,et al.  Microhardness and Young's modulus in cortical bone exhibiting a wide range of mineral volume fractions, and in a bone analogue , 1990 .

[8]  G. Pharr,et al.  Effects of drying on the mechanical properties of bovine femur measured by nanoindentation , 1999, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[9]  J. K. Weaver The microscopic hardness of bone. , 1966, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  D. McNally,et al.  Knoop microhardness anisotropy of the ovine radius. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Elastic modulus and hardness of cortical and trabecular bone lamellae measured by nanoindentation in the human femur. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  R. Aspden,et al.  Material Properties of Subchondral Bone from Patients with Osteoporosis or Osteoarthritis by Microindentation testing and Electron Probe Microanalysis , 2003, Calcified Tissue International.

[13]  S. Weiner,et al.  Microstructure-microhardness relations in parallel-fibered and lamellar bone. , 1996, Bone.

[14]  P Zioupos,et al.  Exploring the Effects of Hypermineralisation in Bone Tissue by Using an Extreme Biological Example , 2000, Connective tissue research.

[15]  G. Niebur,et al.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.