ORGANIZATION DESIGN IN MOTION: DESIGNING AN ORGANIZATION FOR AGILITY

Abstract Increasingly competitive and multifaceted business landscapes and the accelerating pace of innovation require organizations to build in-house capability to evaluate the effectiveness of their design and redesign their organizational structure to drive agile product development. The purpose of this research is to examine how the ability of an organization to implement agile is affected by the organization design. A case study based on 35 semi-structured interviews and field observations at a leading, large-size, Danish software development company was carried out. Adopting the contingency perspective, this paper presents the relevant organizational elements that can increase organizational agility and how the companies can leverage the advantages of the design. Accordingly, it provides a framework that compromises eighteen core organizational practices grouped into four categories (organizational structure and governance, culture and people, IT tools and data infrastructure, and processes) to understand the effect of organization design on agile product development.

[1]  Sara Shafiee,et al.  Rethinking organization design to enforce organizational agility , 2019 .

[2]  Peter Trkman,et al.  International Journal of Information Management , 2022 .

[3]  Loizos Heracleous,et al.  Organizational Design for Agility , 2018 .

[4]  K. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation , 1990 .

[5]  Wolfgang H. Güttel,et al.  HRM in dynamic environments: Exploitative, exploratory, and ambidextrous HR architectures , 2019 .

[6]  Paul P. Tallon,et al.  Competing Perspectives on the Link Between Strategic Information Technology Alignment and Organizational Agility: Insights from a Mediation Model , 2011, MIS Q..

[7]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[8]  L. Donaldson.  The Contingency Theory of Organizations , 2001 .

[9]  Nathan Bennett,et al.  What VUCA really means for you , 2014 .

[10]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[11]  Andrew Davies,et al.  Building Project Capabilities: From Exploratory to Exploitative Learning , 2004 .

[12]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations , 1983 .

[13]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[14]  Jaap Paauwe,et al.  HRM in turbulent times: how to achieve organizational agility? , 2012 .

[15]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  GitHub: exploring the space between boss-less and hierarchical forms of organizing , 2017, Journal of Organization Design.

[16]  Øystein D. Fjeldstad,et al.  The architecture of collaboration , 2012 .

[17]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[18]  N. Muhamad,et al.  Organic structure and organisational learning as the main antecedents of workforce agility , 2014 .

[19]  Carlos Rey,et al.  Agile Purpose: Overcoming Bureaucracy , 2019 .

[20]  Frederic Laloux,et al.  Reinventing Organizations: A Guide to Creating Organizations Inspired by the Next Stage of Human Consciousness , 2014 .

[21]  Michael G. Jacobides,et al.  The Inherent Limits of Organizational Structure and the Unfulfilled Role of Hierarchy: Lessons from a Near-War , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[22]  K. Wigger,et al.  Resource Mobilization for Temporary Opportunities , 2018, Academy of Management Proceedings.

[23]  Lars Hvam,et al.  Application of design thinking to product-configuration projects , 2020 .