Guaranteeing quality in the EU: who gains most?

Regulating product quality benefits consumers in reducing uncertainty and allowing them to economize on search costs. Theoretical analysis suggests that not all consumers benefit to the same extent, with non-poor, less well educated and older people tending to gain most. These conclusions are supported by regression analysis of Eurobarometer data on attitudes to an EU priority to guarantee quality. The results also indicate the essential nature of the EU trade-off with countries having to compromise on their desired outcome when agreeing on a common EU standard. Institutional trust is also a critical factor in determining support for such a standard.

[1]  M. Keane,et al.  Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Capturing Dynamic Brand Choice Processes in Turbulent Consumer Goods Markets , 1996 .

[2]  C. Hjorth-Andersen.  Quality Indicators: in Theory and in Fact , 1991 .

[3]  Rick L. Andrews.  Economics of information and heterogeneous products , 1992 .

[4]  Alan O. Sykes,et al.  Product Standards for Internationally Integrated Goods Markets , 1995 .

[5]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  Marketing and Economic Development , 1958 .

[6]  E. Maynes,et al.  Informationally Imperfect Consumer Markets: Empirical Findings and Policy Implications , 1982 .

[7]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Pricing, price dispersion, and information: The discount brokerage industry , 1986 .

[8]  J. Bettman.  An information processing theory of consumer choice , 1979 .

[9]  M. Magnusson,et al.  Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods , 2002, Appetite.

[10]  J. M. Bates,et al.  The Combination of Forecasts , 1969 .

[11]  Trygve Ugland,et al.  Experiments in Food Safety Policy Integration in the European Union , 2006 .

[12]  T. Tyszka,et al.  Perception and judgments of the economic system , 1992 .

[13]  John Hudson,et al.  Standardization and the costs of assessing quality , 1996 .

[14]  D. Lecraw,et al.  Some Economic Effects of Standards , 1984 .

[15]  T. Scitovszky.  Some Consequences of the Habit of Judging Quality by Price , 1944 .

[16]  H. Leavitt.  A Note on Some Experimental Findings About the Meanings of Price , 1954 .

[17]  Robert D. Cooter,et al.  The Strategic Constitution , 2000 .

[18]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[19]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[20]  George A. Akerlof.  The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[21]  The slow pace of institutional change in the Italian food system , 2006, Appetite.

[22]  David Zilberman,et al.  Public goods and the value of product quality regulations: the case of food safety , 2003 .

[23]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  How older adults meet complexity: Aging effects on the usability of different mobile phones , 2005, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[24]  Ingelore Mammes,et al.  Promoting Girls' Interest in Technology through Technology Education: A Research Study , 2004 .

[25]  Mieke Van Houtte,et al.  Why boys achieve less at school than girls: the difference between boys' and girls' academic culture , 2004 .

[26]  R. L. Winkler.  Combining Probability Distributions from Dependent Information Sources , 1981 .

[27]  Pola B. Gupta,et al.  Estimating the efficiency of consumer choices of new automobiles , 1992 .

[28]  Douglas Powell,et al.  Public Perceptions of Biotechnology , 2002 .

[29]  W. Rogers,et al.  The Use of Communication Technologies by Older Adults: Exploring the Benefits from the User's Perspective , 2001 .