Exploring the role of informants in interpretive case study research in IS

Recent information systems research calls for interaction between the researcher and the informants in interpretive case study research. In line with Van de Ven's call for engaged scholarship, we investigate how to involve the informants in case studies, not only for the collection of facts, but also in the co-construction and interpretation of the case narrative. The paper builds on a longitudinal case study, in which we explored an approach of extensive informant involvement. Using the ladder of analytical abstraction as our analytical tool, we discuss how an extended involvement of informants may enrich the interpretive process in case study research, and increase the relevance of the findings. We discuss how and under what conditions this form of involvement may take place, and potential challenges of this approach.

[1]  J. Morse.  Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction , 1996 .

[2]  Pamela L. Eddy.  COLLEGE ' OF WILLIAM AND MARY , 2004 .

[3]  Erica L. Wagner.  Interconnecting Information Systems Narrative Research: An End-to-End Approach for Process-Oriented Field Studies , 2002, Global and Organizational Discourse about Information Technology.

[4]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[5]  J. Kallinikos.  Farewell to constructivism: technology and context-embedded action , 2004 .

[6]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..

[7]  Jan Weglarz,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[8]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  The Unified Software Development Process , 1999 .

[9]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Groupware, social action and organizational emergence: On the process dynamics of computer mediated distributed work , 1998 .

[10]  David K. Goldstein,et al.  Information support for sales and marketing: A case study at a small grocery manufacturer , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[12]  Pär Mårtensson,et al.  Dialogical Action Research at Omega Corporation , 2004, MIS Q..

[13]  M. Bloor.  Techniques of Validation in Qualitative Research: a Critical Commentary , 1997 .

[14]  Tom Carney.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1991 .

[15]  K. Seers.  Qualitative data analysis , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[16]  Victoria Hoban,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner , 2013 .

[17]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[18]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[19]  Richard Baskerville.  Deferring Generalizability: Four Classes of Generalization in Social Enquir , 1996, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[20]  D. Silverman.  Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[21]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Towards dissolution of the is research debate: from polarization to polarity , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[22]  A. Sayer,et al.  Realism and Social Science , 1999 .

[23]  A. Pettigrew.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[24]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[25]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards , 1997 .

[26]  A. Strauss,et al.  Field Research: Strategies for a Natural Sociology. , 1974 .

[27]  N. Moules.  Hermeneutic Inquiry: Paying Heed to History and Hermes An Ancestral, Substantive, and Methodological Tale , 2002 .

[28]  A. Pettigrew.  Contextualist Research and the Study of Organizational Change Processes , 1985 .

[29]  Harold G. Levine,et al.  Diagnosing the Human Threats to Information Technology Implementation: A Missing Factor in Systems Analysis Illustrated in a Case Study , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[31]  Yvonna S. Lincoln,et al.  Ethics: The Failure of Positivist Science , 2017 .

[32]  Daniel Lerner,et al.  Quantity and Quality , 1999, Science.

[33]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities , 1999, MIS Q..

[34]  Matthew Longshore Smith,et al.  Overcoming theory-practice inconsistencies: Critical realism and information systems research , 2006, Inf. Organ..

[35]  Brian Nicholson,et al.  Embedded Knowledge and Offshore Software Development , 2004, 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2007).

[36]  D. Schoen.  The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[37]  Bendik Bygstad,et al.  Managing Socio-Technical Integration in Iterative Information System Development Projects , 2006, Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact..

[38]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Engaged Scholarship in IS , 2008 .

[39]  J. Morse,et al.  Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[40]  Barbara Czarniawska.  Narratives in Social Science Research , 2004 .

[41]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft , 2007, Inf. Organ..

[42]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  Building links between IS research and professional practice: improving the relevance and impact of IS research , 2000, ICIS.

[43]  D. Campbell.  The Informant in Quantitative Research , 1955, American Journal of Sociology.

[44]  Tom Butler,et al.  Towards a hermeneutic method for interpretive research in information systems , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[45]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[46]  Allen S. Lee.  A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies , 1989, MIS Q..

[47]  R. Boland.  Phenomenology: a preferred approach to research on information systems , 1986, Trends in Information Systems.

[48]  S. Kvale.  The Social Construction of Validity , 1995 .

[49]  H. Blumer,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method , 1988 .

[50]  Bendik Bygstad,et al.  Four integration patterns: a socio‐technical approach to integration in IS development projects , 2010, Inf. Syst. J..

[51]  BILL DOOLIN,et al.  Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretive research on information systems , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[52]  Mark C. Paulk,et al.  Using the capability maturity model for software to drive change , 1998 .

[53]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Toward Improving the Relevance of Information Systems Research to Practice: The Role of Applicability Checks , 2008, MIS Q..

[54]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  Reconsidering the Role of the Practical Theorist: On (Re)connecting Theory to Practice in Organization Theory , 2004 .

[55]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[56]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Guy Paré,et al.  Using case study research to build theories of IT implementation , 1997 .

[58]  Liisa von Hellens,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 2007, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[59]  M Lloyd Jones,et al.  Practical considerations in case study research: the relationship between methodology and process. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[60]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  New socio-technical perspectives of IS innovation in organizations , 2003 .

[61]  A. Bryman.  Quantity and quality in social research , 1988 .

[62]  Carol Saunders,et al.  The role of business in IT research , 1998 .

[63]  M. Bloor,et al.  On the Analysis of Observational Data: A Discussion of the Worth and Uses of Inductive Techniques and Respondent Validation , 1978 .