Firm Performance Measures: Temporal Roadblocks to Innovation?

This study identified four performance measures often employed in corporate analysis and examined their relationship with the firm's expenditures in research and development over different periods. These measures reflect both the profitability of the firm and the market value of the firm's total capitalization. This inquiry is motivated by numerous attempts made in the literature to define an ideal measure of corporate financial performance. Repeated surveys and several financial studies [Mechlin and Berg (1980), Watts (1986), Dubofsky and Varadarajan (1987), and Obi (1994)] have revealed that in spite of their empirical shortcomings, the most frequently employed measures are those based on the firm's profitability, essentially, return on equity (ROE), profit margin on sales and return on total capitalization. These measures are handicapped by the fact that they reflect only the historical pattern of the accounting data generating them. In this study, we contend that a reliable measure of performance should reflect the market's perception of the riskiness and timing of the expected returns on the firm's current investments.

[1]  G. Benston The Validity of Studies with Line of Business Data: Reply [The Validity of Profits-Structure Studies with Particular Reference to the FTC's Line of Business Data] , 1985 .

[2]  William P. Lloyd,et al.  Firm-diversification effects on performance as measured by tobin's q , 1994 .

[3]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Corporate Inventive Output, Profits, and Growth , 1965, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Lorne N. Switzer,et al.  The stock market's valuation of R&D spending and market concentration , 1992 .

[5]  Terry G. Seaks,et al.  Functional Form in Regression Models of Tobin's q , 1993 .

[6]  Len M. Nichols,et al.  Contributions of Diversification, Promotion, and R&D to the Value of Multiproduct Firms: A Tobin's q Approach , 1986 .

[7]  Philip L. Cochran,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance , 1984 .

[8]  W. N. Leonard Research and Development in Industrial Growth , 1971, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[10]  Stephen W. Pruitt,et al.  A Simple Approximation of Tobin's Q , 1994 .

[11]  Lawrence G. Franko,et al.  Global corporate competition: Who's winning, who's losing, and the R&D factor as one reason why , 1989 .

[12]  Eugene F. Brigham,et al.  Essentials of Managerial Finance , 1971 .

[13]  D. Hirshleifer Managerial Reputation and Corporate Investment Decisions , 1993 .

[14]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Tobin's q and the Importance of Focus in Firm Performance , 1988 .

[15]  A. S. Fernández-Castro,et al.  Towards a general non-parametric model of corporate performance , 1994 .

[16]  Stephen H. Penman,et al.  An Evaluation of Accounting Rate-of-return , 1991 .

[17]  M. Blaine Profitability and Competitiveness: Lessons from Japanese and American Firms in the 1980s , 1993 .

[18]  M. Hirschey,et al.  Advertising, R&D Expenditures and the Market Value of the Firm , 1993 .