Performance Assessment of a Street‐Drainage Bioretention System

Event-based, flow-paced composite sampling was carried out at the inlet and outlet of a street-side bioretention facility in Seattle, Washington, to assess its ability to reduce street runoff quantity and pollutants. Over 2.5 years, 48 to 74% of the incoming runoff was lost to infiltration and evaporation. Outlet pollutant concentrations were significantly lower than those at the inlet for nearly all monitored constituents. In terms of mass, the system retained most of the incoming pollutants. Besides soluble reactive phosphorus (the mass of which possibly increased), dissolved copper was the least effectively retained; at least 58% of dissolved copper (and potentially as much as 79%) was captured by the system. Motor oil was removed most effectively, with 92 to 96% of the incoming motor oil not leaving the system. The results indicate that bioretention systems can achieve a high level of runoff retention and treatment in real-weather conditions.

[1]  A. R. Jarrett,et al.  Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina , 2006 .

[2]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[3]  Allen P. Davis,et al.  Field Performance of Bioretention: Water Quality , 2007 .

[4]  Allen P Davis,et al.  Heavy metal fates in laboratory bioretention systems. , 2007, Chemosphere.

[5]  John J. Sansalone,et al.  Partitioning and first flush of metals in urban roadway storm water , 1997 .

[6]  Maria Viklander,et al.  Heavy Metal Removal in Cold Climate Bioretention , 2007 .

[7]  T. Mayer,et al.  An exploratory study of urban runoff toxicity , 1999 .

[8]  Steve Borroum,et al.  IMPACT OF ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ON HIGHWAY RUNOFF POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS , 2002 .

[9]  Michael E Barrett,et al.  Performance Comparison of Structural Stormwater Best Management Practices , 2005, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[10]  A. Davis,et al.  Multiple-event study of bioretention for treatment of urban storm water runoff. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  Michael E. Dietz,et al.  A Field Evaluation of Rain Garden Flow and Pollutant Treatment , 2005 .

[12]  Michael E. Barrett,et al.  Evaluation of methods for estimating stormwater pollutant loads , 1998 .

[13]  Mohammad Shokouhian,et al.  Water Quality Improvement through Bioretention: Lead, Copper, and Zinc Removal , 2003, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[14]  C. Jackson,et al.  URBANIZATION OF AQUATIC SYSTEMS: DEGRADATION THRESHOLDS, STORMWATER DETECTION, AND THE LIMITS OF MITIGATION 1 , 1997 .

[15]  E W Strecker,et al.  POLLUTANT LOADINGS AND IMPACTS FROM HIGHWAY STORMWATER RUNOFF. VOLUME III: ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION AND RESEARCH REPORT , 1990 .

[16]  S. Burges,et al.  Effects of urban development in the Puget Lowland, Washington, on interannual streamflow patterns: Consequences for channel form and streambed disturbance , 2005 .

[17]  S. Buchberger,et al.  Physical characteristics of urban roadway solids transported during rain events , 1998 .

[18]  V. Tsihrintzis,et al.  GIS-Aided Modeling of Nonpoint Source Pollution Impacts on Surface and Ground Waters , 1997 .

[19]  A. Davis,et al.  Laboratory Study of Biological Retention for Urban Stormwater Management , 2001, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[20]  Lisa D. Sabin,et al.  Contribution of trace metals from atmospheric deposition to stormwater runoff in a small impervious urban catchment. , 2005, Water research.