Digital microfabrication of user‐defined 3D microstructures in cell‐laden hydrogels

Complex 3D interfacial arrangements of cells are found in several in vivo biosystems such as blood vasculature, renal glomeruli, and intestinal villi. Current tissue engineering techniques fail to develop suitable 3D microenvironments to evaluate the concurrent effects of complex topography and cell encapsulation. There is a need to develop new fabrication approaches that control cell density and distribution within complex 3D features. In this work, we present a dynamic projection printing process that allows rapid construction of complex 3D structures using custom‐defined computer‐aided‐design (CAD) files. Gelatin‐methacrylate (GelMA) constructs featuring user‐defined spiral, pyramid, flower, and dome micro‐geometries were fabricated with and without encapsulated cells. Encapsulated cells demonstrate good cell viability across all geometries both on the scaffold surface and internal to the structures. Cells respond to geometric cues individually as well as collectively throughout the larger‐scale patterns. Time‐lapse observations also reveal the dynamic nature of mechanical interactions between cells and micro‐geometry. When compared to conventional cell‐seeding, cell encapsulation within complex 3D patterned scaffolds provides long‐term control over proliferation, cell morphology, and geometric guidance. Overall, this biofabrication technique offers a flexible platform to evaluate cell interactions with complex 3D micro‐features, with the ability to scale‐up towards high‐throughput screening platforms. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013;110: 3038–3047. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  F. Pampaloni,et al.  The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[2]  Hirofumi Hidai,et al.  The effect of micronscale anisotropic cross patterns on fibroblast migration. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[3]  Xiaofeng Cui,et al.  Application of inkjet printing to tissue engineering , 2006, Biotechnology journal.

[4]  S. Bhatia,et al.  Microscale culture of human liver cells for drug development , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Nan Ma,et al.  Patterning human stem cells and endothelial cells with laser printing for cardiac regeneration. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[6]  Stephanie I. Fraley,et al.  A distinctive role for focal adhesion proteins in three-dimensional cell motility , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[7]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Microfabrication of complex porous tissue engineering scaffolds using 3D projection stereolithography. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[8]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Fab@Home: the personal desktop fabricator kit , 2007 .

[9]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Cell interactions with three-dimensional matrices. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[10]  A. Khademhosseini,et al.  Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[11]  M L Yarmush,et al.  Effect of cell–cell interactions in preservation of cellular phenotype: cocultivation of hepatocytes and nonparenchymal cells , 1999, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[12]  L. Koch,et al.  Laser printing of cells into 3D scaffolds , 2010, Biofabrication.

[13]  Jiajie Yu,et al.  In vitro 3D human small intestinal villous model for drug permeability determination. , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  S. Bryant,et al.  Cell encapsulation in biodegradable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. , 2008, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[15]  Ravi A. Desai,et al.  Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates , 2010, Nature Methods.

[16]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Patterning proteins and cells using soft lithography. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[17]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Microfluidic hydrodynamic cellular patterning for systematic formation of co-culture spheroids. , 2009, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[18]  K. Leong,et al.  Substrate topography shapes cell function , 2009 .

[19]  Mark W. Tibbitt,et al.  Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[20]  A. Khademhosseini,et al.  Directed assembly of cell-laden microgels for fabrication of 3D tissue constructs , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Shinji Sugiura,et al.  Stepwise assembly of micropatterned co‐cultures using photoresponsive culture surfaces and its application to hepatic tissue arrays , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[22]  Dietmar W. Hutmacher,et al.  Bioengineered 3D platform to explore cell-ECM interactions and drug resistance of epithelial ovarian cancer cells. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[23]  K. Vecchio,et al.  Cancer cell migration within 3D layer-by-layer microfabricated photocrosslinked PEG scaffolds with tunable stiffness. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[24]  Sailing He,et al.  Rapid Fabrication of Complex 3D Extracellular Microenvironments by Dynamic Optical Projection Stereolithography , 2012, Advanced materials.

[25]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Micromolding of shape-controlled, harvestable cell-laden hydrogels. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[26]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Electrically Programmable Surfaces for Configurable Patterning of Cells , 2008 .

[27]  C James Kirkpatrick,et al.  Co-culture systems for vascularization--learning from nature. , 2011, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[28]  James A Bankson,et al.  Three-dimensional tissue culture based on magnetic cell levitation. , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[29]  Paul N Manson,et al.  Variable cytocompatibility of six cell lines with photoinitiators used for polymerizing hydrogels and cell encapsulation. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[30]  David J Mooney,et al.  Cancer cell angiogenic capability is regulated by 3D culture and integrin engagement , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Vladimir Mironov,et al.  Bioprinting living structures , 2007 .

[32]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.

[33]  Robert Langer,et al.  Engineering systems for the generation of patterned co-cultures for controlling cell-cell interactions. , 2011, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[34]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  High-throughput 3D spheroid culture and drug testing using a 384 hanging drop array. , 2011, The Analyst.

[35]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[36]  Masayuki Yamato,et al.  Fabrication of transferable micropatterned-co-cultured cell sheets with microcontact printing. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[37]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[38]  Sangeeta N Bhatia,et al.  Micromechanical control of cell–cell interactions , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Rashid Bashir,et al.  Three-dimensional photopatterning of hydrogels using stereolithography for long-term cell encapsulation. , 2010, Lab on a chip.