Factors that determine depth perception of trapezoids, windsurfers, runways

We report here a windsurfer1 illusion, a naturally occurring trapezoidal illusion in which the small end of the sail viewed at a distance appears to be pointed away from the observer even when it is closer. This naturally occurring illusion is so compelling that observers are unaware of their gross perceptual misinterpretation of the scene. Four laboratory experiment of this kind of trapezoidal illusion investigated the joint effects of retinal orientation, head position, relative motion, and the relative direction of gravity on automatic depth perception. Observers viewed two adjacent white trapezoids outlined on a black background rotating back and forth ± 20° on a vertical axis much like the sails of two adjacent windsurfers. Observers reported which side of the trapezoids (long or short) appeared to be closer to them (i.e., in front). The longer edge of the trapezoid was reported in front 76 ± 2% of trials (“windsurfer effect”) whether it was on the left or on the right. When the display was rotated 90°to produce a runway configuration, there was a striking asymmetry: the long edge was perceived to be in front 97% when it was on the bottom but only 43% when it was on top (“runway effect”). The runway effect persisted when the head was tilted 90° or when displays on the ceiling were viewed from the floor. Ninety-five percent of the variance of the variance in the strikingly different 3D perceptions produced by the same 2D trapezoid image was quantitatively explained by a model that assumes there are just three additive bias factors that account for perceiving an edge as closer: Implicit linear perspective, lower position on the retina (based on an automatic assumption of viewing from above), and being lower in world coordinates.

[1]  C. Erkelens The extent of visual space inferred from perspective angles , 2015, i-Perception.

[2]  Casper J Erkelens,et al.  Computation and measurement of slant specified by linear perspective. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[3]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Shape From Shading , 2006, Handbook of Mathematical Models in Computer Vision.

[4]  Laurence R Harris,et al.  Shape-from-Shading Depends on Visual, Gravitational, and Body-Orientation Cues , 2004, Perception.

[5]  M P Munger,et al.  Representational momentum for rotations in depth: effects of shadings and axis. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Observer biases in the 3D interpretation of line drawings , 1998, Vision Research.

[7]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[8]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[9]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Prime time: Fatigue and set effects in the perception of reversible figures , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  I P Howard,et al.  Shape from Shading in Different Frames of Reference , 1990, Perception.

[11]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Shape from shading , 1989 .

[12]  I Rock,et al.  Regression to egocentrically determined description of form under conditions of inattention. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  J. Bharucha,et al.  Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  G. Sperling,et al.  Tradeoffs between stereopsis and proximity luminance covariance as determinants of perceived 3D structure , 1986, Vision Research.

[15]  R. P. Power,et al.  Apparent Reversal Frequencies in Squares and Trapezia: The Effect of Invariant and Variant Information , 1983, Perception.

[16]  Kenneth R. Stern,et al.  Static and dynamic factors in the perception of rotary motion , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  A. Yonas,et al.  The role of frames of reference in the development of responsiveness to shading information. , 1979, Child development.

[18]  J. Braden,et al.  The effect of varying linear perspective, movement parallax, and speed of rotation on perceived oscillation of two-dimensional trapezoidal stimuli , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Cahill Mc Apparent reversals seen by three types of perceiver of the Ames trapezoid illusion. , 1975 .

[20]  M. Cahill Apparent reversals seen by three types of perceiver of the Ames trapezoid illusion. , 1975, The Journal of general psychology.

[21]  The role of perceptual cues in the trapezoid oscillatory illusion. , 1975, The Journal of general psychology.

[22]  Malcolm D. Arnoult,et al.  Orientation and Form , 1974 .

[23]  Depth Cues and Apparent Oscillatory Motion , 1969, Perceptual and motor skills.

[24]  R. Zenhausern Effect of Perspective on Two Trapezoid Illusions , 1969, Perceptual and Motor Skills.

[25]  J. F. Cross,et al.  The misperception of rotary motion , 1969 .

[26]  W A Hershberger,et al.  Comment on "apparent reversal (oscillation) of rotary motion in depth". , 1967, Psychological review.

[27]  R. B. Mefferd,et al.  CHANGING PERCEPTION OF AN "INCOMPLETE" TRAPEZOID IN ROTATION , 1966 .

[28]  M. Guastella New theory on apparent movement. , 1966, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[29]  B. E. Dunn,et al.  Relative Height on the Picture-Plane and Depth Perception , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.

[30]  R. Day,et al.  APPARENT REVERSAL (OSCILLATION) OF ROTARY MOTION IN DEPTH: AN INVESTIGATION AND A GENERAL THEORY. , 1965, Psychological review.

[31]  C. H. Graham,et al.  ON SOME ASPECTS OF REAL AND APPARENT VISUAL MOVEMENT. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[32]  I. Rock,et al.  The effect of retinal and phenomenal orientation on the perception of form. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[33]  T. Mulholland Motion preceived while viewing rotating stimulus-objects. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.

[34]  A. Ames Visual perception and the rotating trapezoidal window , 1951 .

[35]  Robert J. Wherry,et al.  Multiple Factor Analysis: A Development and Expansion of "The Vectors of the Mind" , 1948 .

[36]  L. L. Thurstone,et al.  Multiple-factor analysis; a development and expansion of The Vectors of Mind. , 1947 .