Exploring the Variability of Segregation Index D with Scale and Zonal Systems: An Analysis of Thirty US Cities

In this paper, we propose a methodology to study the scale effect and zoning effect of the modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP). Instead of aggregating basic spatial units by the neighborhood criterion, we suggest placing a square lattice over the centroids representing the enumeration units in the study area. Areal units are aggregated if their centroids are in the same square. By changing the size of the square in the lattice, we can study the scale effect. By randomly placing the lattice, we can study the zoning effect. This methodology links the MAUP effects to specific scale reflected by the size of grids. We use this method to study the MAUP effects on the segregation index D. Among the thirty selected cities in the USA, values of D respond to the MAUP in a diverse pattern. We assess the scale effect on D by examining the changes of averaged values of D over the range of scale levels. We also borrow concepts from fractal analysis to assess the scale effect on D and to measure how sensitive the D values of these cities are to different zonal patterns.

[1]  Carl Amrhein,et al.  Using spatial statistics to assess aggregation effects , 1996 .

[2]  John F. Jakubs.  A distance-based segregation index , 1981 .

[3]  S H Putman,et al.  Effects of Spatial System Design on Spatial Interaction Models. 1: The Spatial System Definition Problem , 1988 .

[4]  A. Fotheringham,et al.  Urban systems as examples of bounded chaos: exploring the relationship between fractal dimension, rank-size, and rural-to- urban migration , 1990 .

[5]  O. D. Duncan,et al.  A METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF SEGREGATION INDEXES , 1955 .

[6]  M Batty,et al.  Spatial Aggregation in Gravity Models: 3. Two-Dimensional Trip Distribution and Location Models , 1982, Environment & planning A.

[7]  W. Tobler.  Frame independent spatial analysis , 1989 .

[8]  M. Goodchild.  Fractals and the accuracy of geographical measures , 1980 .

[9]  M. Batty,et al.  Urban Growth and Form: Scaling, Fractal Geometry, and Diffusion-Limited Aggregation , 1989 .

[10]  D. Mark,et al.  Scale-dependent fractal dimensions of topographic surfaces: An empirical investigation, with applications in geomorphology and computer mapping , 1984 .

[11]  C. Amrhein.  Searching for the Elusive Aggregation Effect: Evidence from Statistical Simulations , 1995 .

[12]  C. Amrhein,et al.  USING THE GETIS STATISTIC TO EXPLORE AGGREGATION EFFECTS IN METROPOLITAN TORONTO CENSUS DATA , 1997 .

[13]  A S Fotheringham,et al.  The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem in Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1991 .

[14]  S. Openshaw.  A million or so correlation coefficients : three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem , 1979 .

[15]  Carl Amrhein,et al.  The Effect of Data Aggregation on a Poisson Regression Model of Canadian Migration , 1992 .

[16]  Hao Chen,et al.  Parallel Simulated Annealing and Genetic Algorithms: a Space of Hybrid Methods , 1994, PPSN.

[17]  David Wong,et al.  Research on the MAUP: old wine in a new bottle or real breakthrough? , 1996 .

[18]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  Optimal Zoning Systems for Spatial Interaction Models , 1977 .

[19]  David W. S. Wong,et al.  Spatial dependency of segregation indices , 1997 .

[20]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  An Empirical Study of Some Zone-Design Criteria , 1978 .

[21]  M Batty,et al.  Spatial Aggregation in Gravity Models: 4. Generalisations and Large-Scale Applications , 1982, Environment & planning A.

[22]  Stewart Fotheringham,et al.  Scale-independent spatial analysis , 1989 .

[23]  Daniel B. Carr,et al.  Hexagon Mosaic Maps for Display of Univariate and Bivariate Geographical Data , 1992 .