Channel modeling and estimation for intrapage equalization in pixel-matched volume holographic data storage.

We present two different channel models (the magnitude model and the intensity model) for a pixel-matched volume holographic data storage system that employs the 4-focal-length architecture. First, a framework to describe the channel models is developed. We evaluate the linearity of the channel models by comparing data values obtained from diffraction-limited interference with data values predicted by the channel models. The models are evaluated for linearity and equalization gain under different storage and read-back conditions, such as fill factors, apertures, and contrast ratios. Bit error rate results obtained by use of linear equalization methods in conjunction with the channel models developed are also presented. Our results suggest that the magnitude model leads to better performance when the fill factors are small, whereas the intensity model appears to be more appropriate for the high-fill-factor cases. The magnitude model, when suitable, appears to provide a storage density improvement of as great as 65%, whereas the intensity model seems capable of providing as much as 15% density gain through deconvolution. The optimum aperture for storage seems to be close to the Nyquist aperture.

[1]  L Hesselink,et al.  Signal detection for page-accessoptical memories with intersymbol interference. , 1996, Applied optics.

[2]  C Gu,et al.  Bit-error rate and statistics of complex amplitude noise in holographic data storage. , 1996, Optics letters.

[3]  D Psaltis,et al.  Cross talk for angle- and wavelength-multiplexed image plane holograms. , 1994, Optics letters.

[4]  Bhagavatula Vijaya Kumar,et al.  Figure of merit for the optical aperture used in digital volume holographic data storage , 1998, Other Conferences.

[5]  G W Burr,et al.  Effects of multilevel phase masks on interpixel cross talk in digital holographic storage. , 1997, Applied optics.

[6]  Claire Gu,et al.  Crosstalk limited storage capacity of volume holographic memory , 1992, Optical Society of America Annual Meeting.

[7]  Lambertus Hesselink,et al.  Optical memories implemented with photorefractive media , 1993 .

[8]  J Hong,et al.  Influence of phase masks on cross talk in holographic memory. , 1996, Optics letters.

[9]  S. H. Lee,et al.  Two-dimensional spatial light modulators: a tutorial , 1990, Proc. IEEE.

[10]  C Gu,et al.  Statistical analysis of cross-talk noise and storage capacity in volume holographic memory. , 1994, Optics letters.

[11]  Michael W. Marcellin,et al.  Binary image reconstruction via 2-D Viterbi search , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing.

[12]  John H. Hong,et al.  Statistics of both optical and electrical noise in digital volume holographic data storage , 1996 .

[13]  G W Burr,et al.  Balancing interpixel cross talk and detector noise to optimize areal density in holographic storage systems. , 1998, Applied optics.

[14]  D. Psaltis,et al.  Control of volume holograms , 1992 .

[15]  M A Neifeld,et al.  Parallel data detection in page-oriented optical memory. , 1996, Optics letters.

[16]  Lambertus Hesselink,et al.  Channel codes for digital holographic data storage , 1995 .

[17]  Bhagavatula Vijaya Kumar,et al.  Channel estimation and intrapage equalization for digital volume holographic data storage , 1997, Other Conferences.