In vivo and in vitro natural frequency analysis of periodontal conditions: an innovative method.

BACKGROUND When measuring periodontal disease, various types of equipment for making objective measurements of tooth mobility have been proposed. However, these devices and methodology are insufficient in terms of reliability. An innovative method using vibrational theories to assess the periodontal attachment level of natural teeth is presented in this study. METHODS Modal testing technique, a non-destructive and time-saving method, was used for non-invasive and quantitative measurement of the natural frequencies of the upper central incisor in vivo and in vitro. A finite element model was established, and modal testing experiments were simulated to assess the relationship between bone level and teeth. RESULTS The first dominant natural frequency of healthy human upper central incisors ranges from 710 Hz to 3,360 Hz, with an average of 1,701+/-679 Hz. Both in vitro experiment and finite element simulation showed that lowering of the attachment level causes a significant decrease in the natural frequencies, and a strong relationship (r = -0.99, P <0.01) was observed between the frequency and the bone level height. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggested that natural frequency is an important parameter for assessing the periodontal condition and that the modal testing technique is a useful supplemental method for assessing the attachment conditions of the periodontium.

[1]  J. R. Johansen,et al.  The zone of completely and partially destructed periodontal fibres in pathological pockets. , 1975, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[2]  S C Bayne,et al.  Finite element analysis estimates of cement microfracture under complete veneer crowns. , 1994, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  M. C. Lee,et al.  Finite element analysis of cerebral contusion. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  G Faulkner,et al.  Assessment of the periotest device in baseline mobility measurements of craniofacial implants. , 1995, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[5]  G. Seward,et al.  Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation , 1982 .

[6]  M. C. Lee,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effects of posts on stress distribution in dentin. , 1994, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  J B Brunski,et al.  A dynamic modal testing technique for noninvasive assessment of bone-dental implant interfaces. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[8]  Hans R. Mühlemann,et al.  Periodontometry, a method for measuring tooth mobility , 1951 .

[9]  A M Polson,et al.  Histological determination of probe tip penetration into gingival sulcus of humans using an electronic pressure-sensitive probe. , 1980, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[10]  L. S. Matthews,et al.  Sonic diagnosis of bone fracture healing--a preliminary study. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  W. Thomson.  Theory of vibration with applications , 1965 .

[12]  M. Ogino,et al.  Acoustoelectric technique for assessing the mechanical state of the dental implant-bone interface. , 1986, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[13]  P. Robinson,et al.  The relationship between gingival inflammation and resistance to probe penetration. , 1979, Journal of periodontal research.

[14]  J L Lewis.  A dynamic model of a healing fractured long bone. , 1975, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  S Saha,et al.  The assessment of in vivo bone condition in humans by impact response measurement. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  V K Goel,et al.  A three-dimensional finite element model. , 1988, Operative dentistry.

[17]  D H Noyes,et al.  Measurement of mechanical mobility of human incisors with sinusoidal forces. , 1973, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  H Löe,et al.  Microscopic evaluation of clinical measurements of connective tissue attachment levels. , 1977, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[19]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Textbook of clinical periodontology , 1989 .

[20]  D. W. Johnson,et al.  Compressive Properties of Enamel, Dental Cements, and Gold , 1961 .

[21]  K R Williams,et al.  Impulse response of a dental implant in bone by numerical analysis. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[22]  F. A. Peyton,et al.  Elastic and Mechanical Properties of Human Dentin , 1958, Journal of dental research.

[23]  T Kaneko.  Pulsed oscillation technique for assessing the mechanical state of the dental implant-bone interface. , 1991, Biomaterials.

[24]  T. Kaneko,et al.  Assessment of the interfacial rigidity of bone implants from vibrational signals , 1987 .

[25]  Stiffness of canine stifle joint ligaments at relatively high rates of elongation. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[26]  Stephen Cohen,et al.  Pathways of the Pulp , 1976 .

[27]  A. Christensen,et al.  Assessment of tibial stiffness by vibration testing in situ--I. Identification of mode shapes in different supporting conditions. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  H. Oka,et al.  Application of mechanical mobility of periodontal tissues to tooth mobility examination , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[29]  K Okimoto,et al.  Numeric approach to the biomechanical analysis of thermal effects in coated implants. , 1993, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[30]  M. Listgarten,et al.  Periodontal probing: what does it mean? , 1980, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[31]  G. van der Perre,et al.  Study of the vibrational behaviour of a healing tibia using finite element modelling. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  Russell C. Wheeler,et al.  Dental anatomy, physiology, and occlusion , 1974 .

[33]  G Van der Perre,et al.  The relation between resonant frequencies and torsional stiffness of long bones in vitro. Validation of a simple beam model. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  N Meredith,et al.  Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.