Separation of biodiesel and glycerol using ceramic membranes

Abstract This study investigated the efficiency of microfiltration with ceramic membranes in the separation of biodiesel and glycerol. Runs in a micro- and ultrafiltration module were performed in batch mode using tangential filtration. The experiments were carried out with tubular Al 2 O 3 /TiO 2 ceramic membranes with average pore size of 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 μm and filtration area of 0.005 m 2 . In the first part of the experiment, synthetic blends (feed solution) prepared with mass composition of 80% biodiesel, 10% glycerol, and 10% anhydrous ethanol were microfiltered at 60 °C and transmembrane pressures of 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 bar. Membrane performance was evaluated based on the capacity to retain glycerol and on the permeate flux values. Experimental results showed that transmembrane pressure has a strong influence on biodiesel microfiltration. The best performance was obtained with the 0.2 μm membrane and 2.0 bar transmembrane pressure. In these conditions and at the same temperature that was used in the previous experiments (60 °C), the influence of the ethanol concentration on the feed solution separation was evaluated. The highest ethanol concentration in the feed solution used, 20%, resulted in the highest glycerol concentration in the permeate. The lowest flux decline rate and the highest glycerol retention (99.6%), were achieved for the feed solution with 5% ethanol.

[1]  José M. Encinar,et al.  Ethanolysis of used frying oil. Biodiesel preparation and characterization , 2007 .

[2]  Shenlin Zhu,et al.  Comparison of membrane extraction with traditional extraction methods for biodiesel production , 2006 .

[3]  R. Boom,et al.  Preparation of double emulsions by membrane emulsification—a review , 2005 .

[4]  M. Dubé,et al.  Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: 1. Process design and technological assessment. , 2003, Bioresource technology.

[5]  Lianfa Song.  Flux decline in crossflow microfiltration and ultrafiltration: mechanisms and modeling of membrane fouling , 1998 .

[6]  Younis Jamal,et al.  A review of biodiesel as vehicular fuel , 2008 .

[7]  F. Karaosmanôglu,et al.  Optimization of Base-Catalyzed Transesterification Reaction of Used Cooking Oil , 2004 .

[8]  L. Chu,et al.  Fouling-resistant Composite Membranes for Separation of Oil-in-water Microemulsions , 2006 .

[9]  M. Dubé,et al.  Biodiesel production using a membrane reactor. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[10]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Effect of Permeate Flux and Tangential Flow on Membrane Fouling for Wastewater Treatment , 2005 .

[11]  Robert W. Field,et al.  Cross-flow and dead-end microfiltration of oily-water emulsion. Part I: Experimental study and analysis of flux decline , 1995 .

[12]  J. V. Gerpen,et al.  Biodiesel processing and production , 2005 .

[13]  Jürgen Krahl,et al.  The Biodiesel Handbook , 2005 .

[14]  J. V. Soest,et al.  Effect of glycerol on the morphology of starch–sunflower oil composites , 1999 .

[15]  Cherng-Yuan Lin,et al.  Effects of emulsification variables on fuel properties of two- and three-phase biodiesel emulsions , 2007 .

[16]  G. Vicente,et al.  Application of the factorial design of experiments and response surface methodology to optimize biodiesel production , 1998 .

[17]  M. G. Kontominas,et al.  Biodiesel Production: Reaction and Process Parameters of Alkali-Catalyzed Transesterification of Waste Frying Oils , 2007 .

[18]  M. Monteiro,et al.  Critical review on analytical methods for biodiesel characterization , 2008 .

[19]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Influence of cross-flow velocity on membrane performance during filtration of biological suspension , 2005 .

[20]  J. Petrus,et al.  Solvent recovery from soybean oil/hexane miscella by polymeric membranes , 2006 .

[21]  P. Pittia,et al.  Effect of colloidal properties of oil-in-water emulsions on ethanol liquid¿vapour partition , 2005 .

[22]  Jon H. Van Gerpen,et al.  Determining the Influence of Contaminants on Biodiesel Properties , 1997 .

[23]  Ying Wang,et al.  Performance study of ceramic microfiltration membrane for oily wastewater treatment , 2007 .

[24]  Ayhan Demirbas,et al.  Biodiesel: A Realistic Fuel Alternative for Diesel Engines , 2007 .

[25]  P. Wang.  A pilot study of the treatment of waste rolling emulsion using zirconia microfiltration membranes , 2000 .

[26]  M. Dubé,et al.  Effect of Membrane Pore Size on the Performance of a Membrane Reactor for Biodiesel Production , 2007 .