Directed movement in the frog: motor choice, spatial representation, free will?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Grobstein. Between the retinotectal projection and directed movement: topography of a sensorimotor interface. , 1988, Brain, behavior and evolution.
[2] Bernhard Möhl,et al. ‘Biological noise’ and plasticity of sensorimotor pathways in the locust flight system , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[3] Bruce R. Johnson,et al. Modulation of Neural Circuits in Crustacea , 1989 .
[4] D. Ingle. Brain Mechanisms of Visual Localization by Frogs and Toads , 1983 .
[5] P. Grobstein,et al. The potential binocular field and its tectal representation in rana pipiens , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.
[6] P. Grobstein,et al. Tectal connectivity in the frog Rana pipiens: Tectotegmental projections and a general analysis of topographic organization , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.
[7] P A Getting,et al. Emerging principles governing the operation of neural networks. , 1989, Annual review of neuroscience.
[8] P. Grobstein,et al. The organization of descending tectofugal pathways underlying orienting in the frog, Rana pipiens , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.
[9] Paul Grobstein,et al. Directed movement in the frog: a closer look at a central representation of spatial location , 1991 .
[10] Jenny Kien,et al. Decision-making in the insect nervous system: a model for selection and maintenance of motor programmes , 1992 .
[11] P. Stein,et al. Spinal Cord Circuits for Motor Pattern Selection in the Turtle a , 1989, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[12] T. Carew,et al. Invertebrate learning and memory: from behavior to molecules. , 1986, Annual review of neuroscience.
[13] T. S. Collett,et al. Accommodation in anuran Amphibia and its role in depth vision , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[14] J. F. Soechting,et al. Effect of target size on spatial and temporal characteristics of a pointing movement in man , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.
[15] J. Altman,et al. A Model for Decision Making in the Insect Nervous System , 1987 .
[16] K. Lashley. The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .
[17] J. F. Soechting,et al. Coordination of arm and wrist motion during a reaching task , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[18] Paul S. G. Stein,et al. The Forms of a Task and Their Blends , 1986 .
[19] E. Holst,et al. Das Reafferenzprinzip , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.
[21] Christopher Comer,et al. Frog Prey Capture Behavior: Between Sensory Maps and Directed Motor Output , 1983 .
[22] A. Pellionisz. Tensorial Brain Theory in Cerebellar Modelling , 1984 .
[23] D L Sparks,et al. Translation of sensory signals into commands for control of saccadic eye movements: role of primate superior colliculus. , 1986, Physiological reviews.
[24] O. I. Fukson,et al. The spinal frog takes into account the scheme of its body during the wiping reflex. , 1980, Science.
[25] J. Ewert. Neuroethology of releasing mechanisms: Prey-catching in toads , 1987, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[26] K. Lashley. Basic neural mechanisms in behavior. , 1930 .
[27] M. Posner,et al. The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.
[28] O. I. Fukson,et al. Adaptability of innate motor patterns and motor control mechanisms , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[29] D. Ingle. Depth vision in monocular frogs , 1972 .
[30] Lee L. Zwanziger,et al. Prey orienting in frogs: Accounting for variations in output with stimulus distance , 1985, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[31] S. Rossignol,et al. Phase dependent reflex reversal during walking in chronic spinal cats , 1975, Brain Research.
[32] Jenny Kien,et al. New Models for Motor Control , 1989, Neural Computation.
[33] D. Ingle,et al. Visuomotor functions of the frog optic tectum. , 1970, Brain, behavior and evolution.
[34] M. Jordan,et al. The Role o f Eye Accommodation in the Depth Perception of Common Toads , 1980, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.
[35] P. Grobstein,et al. Neuronal organization underlying visually elicited prey orienting in the frog—II. Anatomical studies on the laterality of central projections , 1987, Neuroscience.
[36] Paul Grobstein,et al. Organization in the Sensorimotor Interface: A Case Study with Increased Resolution , 1989 .
[37] P. Grobstein,et al. The organization of descending tectofugal pathways underlying orienting in the frog, Rana pipiens , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.
[38] Paul Grobstein,et al. Visual orienting deficits in frogs with various unilateral lesions , 1982, Behavioural Brain Research.
[39] P. Grobstein,et al. Neuronal organization underlying visually elicited prey orienting in the frog—I. Effects of various unilateral lesions , 1987, Neuroscience.
[40] P. Grobstein,et al. Neuronal organization underlying visually elicited prey orienting in the frog—III. Evidence for the existence of an uncrossed descending tectofugal pathway , 1987, Neuroscience.
[41] R. Sperry. Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. , 1950, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.