A study of the arrival over the United Kingdom in April 2010 of the Eyjafjallajökull ash cloud using ground-based lidar and numerical simulations

We make a qualitative and quantitative comparison of numerical simulations of the ash cloud generated by the eruption of Eyjafjallajokull in April 2010 with ground-based lidar measurements at Exeter and Cardington in southern England. The numerical simulations are performed using the Met Office’s dispersion model, NAME (Numerical Atmospheric-dispersion Modelling Environment). The results show that NAME captures many of the features of the observed ash cloud. The comparison enables us to estimate the fraction of material which survives the near-source fallout processes and enters into the distal plume. A number of simulations are performed which show that both the structure of the ash cloud over southern England and the concentration of ash within it are particularly sensitive to the height of the eruption column (and the consequent estimated mass emission rate), to the shape of the vertical source profile and the level of prescribed ‘turbulent diffusion’ (representing the mixing by the unresolved eddies) in the free troposphere with less sensitivity to the timing of the start of the eruption and the sedimentation of particulates in the distal plume.

[1]  Larry G. Mastin,et al.  A user‐friendly one‐dimensional model for wet volcanic plumes , 2007 .

[2]  H. Webster,et al.  The Entrainment Rate for Buoyant Plumes in a Crossflow , 2010 .

[3]  Barbara J. B. Stunder,et al.  Preliminary sensitivity study of eruption source parameters for operational volcanic ash cloud transport and dispersion models — A case study of the August 1992 eruption of the Crater Peak vent, Mount Spurr, Alaska , 2009 .

[4]  D. Thomson,et al.  Dry deposition modelling in a Lagrangian dispersion model , 2008 .

[5]  J. Klett,et al.  Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation , 1978, Nature.

[6]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Evaluating the structure and magnitude of the ash plume during the initial phase of the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption using lidar observations and NAME simulations , 2011 .

[7]  Andrew W. Woods,et al.  Moist convection and the injection of volcanic ash into the atmosphere , 1993 .

[8]  R. S. J. Sparks,et al.  A gravity current model for the May 18, 1980 Mount St Helens plume , 1980 .

[9]  Marcus I. Bursik,et al.  Effect of wind on the rise height of volcanic plumes , 2001 .

[10]  M. Herzog,et al.  Tall clouds from small eruptions: the sensitivity of eruption height and fine ash content to tropospheric instability , 2009 .

[11]  Richard Cotton,et al.  In situ observations of volcanic ash clouds from the FAAM aircraft during the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull in 2010 , 2012 .

[12]  Larry G. Mastin,et al.  A multidisciplinary effort to assign realistic source parameters to models of volcanic ash-cloud transport and dispersion during eruptions , 2009 .

[13]  William I. Rose,et al.  Integrating retrievals of volcanic cloud characteristics from satellite remote sensors: a summary , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  R. S. J. Sparks,et al.  The dimensions and dynamics of volcanic eruption columns , 1986 .

[15]  J. Klett.  Lidar inversion with variable backscatter/extinction ratios. , 1985, Applied optics.

[16]  Pordur Arason,et al.  Observations of the altitude of the volcanic plume during the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull, April-May 2010 , 2011 .

[17]  F. G. Fernald.  Analysis of atmospheric lidar observations: some comments. , 1984, Applied optics.

[18]  R. Hogan,et al.  Determining the contribution of volcanic ash and boundary layer aerosol in backscatter lidar returns: A three‐component atmosphere approach , 2011 .

[19]  David J. Thomson,et al.  The U.K. Met Office's Next-Generation Atmospheric Dispersion Model, NAME III , 2007 .