Inverse response of osteoblasts and fibroblasts to growth on carbon-deposited titanium surfaces.

Titanium implant surfaces may serve as attachment substrates for various cell types. Since carbon adsorption on titanium is inevitable, this study examined the negative/positive biological reaction of osteoblasts and fibroblasts on carbon-deposited titanium surfaces. Osteogenic MC3T3-E1 and fibrogenic NIH/3T3 cells were separately cultured on titanium disks on which carbon deposition was experimentally regulated to achieve titanium/carbon ratios of 6.5, 0.02, 0.005, and 0. The initial attachment of cells demonstrated that the quantity of attached osteoblasts on Ti/C (0.005) surfaces was 20% lower than that on Ti/C (6.5) surfaces at 4 h of culture. A 40% reduction in cell attachment at 24 h transferring from Ti/C (6.5) to Ti/C (0.005) surfaces highlighted the negative effect of carbon deposition on osteoblast attachment. However, the initial attachment of fibroblasts, which depended on carbon deposition, increased, and the quantity of cells on Ti/C (0.005) surfaces was almost twice that on Ti/C (6.5) surfaces at 4 h of culture. The levels of common differentiation markers of collagen synthesis were also differentially carbon-dependent as total collagen deposition on Ti/C (0.005) decreased by > 30% compared to that on Ti/C (6.5) in osteoblasts after 7 days of culture. In contrast, collagen synthesis in fibroblasts markedly increased as was evident by the increase in carbon deposition. These inverse effects indicate that carbon deposition on a titanium surface would likely be a disadvantage for bone formation, but might represent an effective option for achieving better wound healing and soft tissue sealing around the surface of an implant-neck region. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 106B: 1869-1877, 2018.

[1]  C. Aparicio,et al.  Collagen-functionalised titanium surfaces for biological sealing of dental implants: effect of immobilisation process on fibroblasts response. , 2014, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[2]  Y. Tsutsumi,et al.  Hydrocarbon Deposition Attenuates Osteoblast Activity on Titanium , 2014, Journal of dental research.

[3]  M. Monjo,et al.  Human gingival fibroblasts function is stimulated on machined hydrided titanium zirconium dental implants. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  M. Yousefpour,et al.  The relationship of surface roughness and cell response of chemical surface modification of titanium , 2012, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[5]  Pierre Weiss,et al.  Behaviour of mesenchymal stem cells, fibroblasts and osteoblasts on smooth surfaces. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[6]  M. Yamada,et al.  Enhancement of bone-titanium integration profile with UV-photofunctionalized titanium in a gap healing model. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[7]  P. Rubenstein,et al.  Vinculin Nucleates Actin Polymerization and Modifies Actin Filament Structure* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  Christoph Ballestrem,et al.  Vinculin controls focal adhesion formation by direct interactions with talin and actin , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  Ravi Dhurjati,et al.  Influence of substratum surface chemistry/energy and topography on the human fetal osteoblastic cell line hFOB 1.19: Phenotypic and genotypic responses observed in vitro. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[10]  Martin Schuler,et al.  Systematic study of osteoblast and fibroblast response to roughness by means of surface-morphology gradients. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[11]  Kenji Sakamoto,et al.  Mechanism of photoinduced superhydrophilicity on the TiO2 photocatalyst surface. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[12]  F Rupp,et al.  High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[13]  P. Moy,et al.  Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. , 2005, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  Shen‐guo Wang,et al.  Synthesis and cell affinity of functionalized poly(L-lactide-co-beta-malic acid) with high molecular weight. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[15]  A. P. Serro,et al.  Influence of sterilization on the mineralization of titanium implants induced by incubation in various biological model fluids. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[16]  Guoqiang Chen,et al.  Reduced mouse fibroblast cell growth by increased hydrophilicity of microbial polyhydroxyalkanoates via hyaluronan coating. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[17]  Sang Ho Cho,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of hydrophilic poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/poly(vinyl alcohol) blend cell scaffolds by melt-molding particulate-leaching method. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[18]  M. Bailly Connecting cell adhesion to the actin polymerization machinery: vinculin as the missing link? , 2003, Trends in cell biology.

[19]  I. Nishimura,et al.  Different bone integration profiles of turned and acid-etched implants associated with modulated expression of extracellular matrix genes. , 2003, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[20]  M. Morra,et al.  Surface chemistry effects of topographic modification of titanium dental implant surfaces: 1. Surface analysis. , 2003, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[21]  C W Douglass,et al.  Risk Factors for Dental Implant Failure: A Strategy for the Analysis of Clustered Failure-time Observations , 2002, Journal of dental research.

[22]  M. Textor,et al.  Comparative investigation of the surface properties of commercial titanium dental implants. Part I: chemical composition , 2002, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[23]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Intact vinculin protein is required for control of cell shape, cell mechanics, and rac-dependent lamellipodia formation. , 2002, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[24]  J. Weimer,et al.  Cleaning and heat-treatment effects on unalloyed titanium implant surfaces. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[25]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Surface analysis of failed oral titanium implants. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[26]  P. Niedzielski,et al.  The corrosion tests of amorphous carbon coatings deposited by r.f. dense plasma onto steel with different chromium contents , 1995 .

[27]  J. Beumer,et al.  Histomorphometry of bone apposition around three types of endosseous dental implants. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[28]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Biomaterial and implant surfaces: on the role of cleanliness, contamination, and preparation procedures. , 1988, Journal of biomedical materials research.