Compensation of Susceptibility-Induced BOLD Sensitivity Losses in Echo-Planar fMRI Imaging

Gradient-echo echo-planar imaging is a standard technique in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments based on the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) effect. A major problem is the occurrence of susceptibility gradients near air/tissue interfaces. As a consequence, the detection of neuronal activation may be greatly compromised in certain brain areas, especially in the temporal lobes and in the orbitofrontal cortex. Common approaches to overcome this problem, such as z-shimming or the use of tailored radio frequency pulses, usually compensate only for susceptibility gradients in the slice selection direction. In the present study, the influence of susceptibility gradients in the phase encoding direction is investigated both theoretically and experimentally. It is shown that these gradients influence the effective echo time TE and may reduce considerably the local BOLD sensitivity, even in the case of acceptable image intensities. A compensation method is proposed and tested in an fMRI experiment based on a hypercapnic challenge. The results suggest that the compensation method allows for the detection of activation in brain areas which are usually unavailable for BOLD studies.

[1]  P. Mansfield Multi-planar image formation using NMR spin echoes , 1977 .

[2]  G M Bydder,et al.  The benefits of increasing spatial resolution as a means of reducing artifacts due to field inhomogeneities. , 1988, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  J. Frahm,et al.  Direct FLASH MR imaging of magnetic field inhomogeneities by gradient compensation , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  S. Ogawa,et al.  Oxygenation‐sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Yong Man Ro,et al.  Reduction of susceptibility artifact in gradient‐echo imaging , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  S. Posse,et al.  Direct imaging of magnetic field gradients by group spin‐echoselection , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  J. Frahm,et al.  Functional MRI of human brain activation at high spatial resolution , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  R. Ordidge,et al.  Assessment of relative brain iron concentrations using T2‐weighted and T2*‐weighted MRI at 3 Tesla , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[10]  R M Weisskoff,et al.  MRI signal void due to in‐plane motion is all‐or‐none , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Y M Ro,et al.  Susceptibility Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Spectral Decomposition , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  R T Constable,et al.  Functional MR imaging using gradient‐echo echo‐planar imaging in the presence of large static field inhomogeneities , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  T. L. Davis,et al.  Automated shimming at 1.5 t using echo‐planar image frequency maps , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  P. Jezzard,et al.  Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Experimental determination of the BOLD field strength dependence in vessels and tissue , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  P. Eslinger,et al.  Multi‐gradient echo with susceptibility inhomogeneity compensation (MGESIC): Demonstration of fMRI in the olfactory cortex at 3.0 T , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  M. Raichle,et al.  Anatomic Localization and Quantitative Analysis of Gradient Refocused Echo-Planar fMRI Susceptibility Artifacts , 1997, NeuroImage.

[18]  T. L. Davis,et al.  Calibrated functional MRI: mapping the dynamics of oxidative metabolism. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  T. Mosher,et al.  Removal of local field gradient artifacts in T2*‐weighted images at high fields by gradient‐echo slice excitation profile imaging , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  G H Glover,et al.  3D z‐shim method for reduction of susceptibility effects in BOLD fMRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  G. Glover,et al.  Assessment of cerebral oxidative metabolism with breath holding and fMRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  R. Constable,et al.  Composite image formation in z‐shimmed functional MR imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Susceptibility-Induced Loss of Signal: Comparing PET and fMRI on a Semantic Task , 2000, NeuroImage.

[24]  V A Stenger,et al.  Three‐dimensional tailored RF pulses for the reduction of susceptibility artifacts in T*2‐weighted functional MRI , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  Hui Mao,et al.  Reduced susceptibility artifacts in BOLD fMRI using localized shimming , 2000, NeuroImage.

[26]  M. Blinkenberg,et al.  Regional Differences in the CBF and BOLD Responses to Hypercapnia: A Combined PET and fMRI Study , 2000, NeuroImage.

[27]  R. Turner,et al.  Does Hypercapnia-Induced Cerebral Vasodilation Modulate the Hemodynamic Response to Neural Activation? , 2001, NeuroImage.

[28]  R. Turner,et al.  Assessing Study-Specific Regional Variations in fMRI Signal , 2000, NeuroImage.

[29]  Robert Turner,et al.  Echo Time Dependence of BOLD Contrast and Susceptibility Artifacts , 2001, NeuroImage.