Daily sedation interruption in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients cared for with a sedation protocol: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT Protocolized sedation and daily sedation interruption are 2 strategies to minimize sedation and reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) stay. We hypothesized that combining these strategies would augment the benefits. OBJECTIVE To compare protocolized sedation with protocolized sedation plus daily sedation interruption in critically ill patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Randomized controlled trial of 430 critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults conducted in 16 tertiary care medical and surgical ICUs in Canada and the United States between January 2008 and July 2011. INTERVENTION Continuous opioid and/or benzodiazepine infusions and random allocation to protocolized sedation (n = 209) (control) or to protocolized sedation plus daily sedation interruption (n = 214). Using validated scales, nurses titrated infusions to achieve light sedation. For patients receiving daily interruption, nurses resumed infusions, if indicated, at half of previous doses. Patients were assessed for delirium and for readiness for unassisted breathing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Time to successful extubation. Secondary outcomes included duration of stay, doses of sedatives and opioids, unintentional device removal, delirium, and nurse and respiratory therapist clinical workload (on a 10-point visual analog scale [VAS]). RESULTS Median time to successful extubation was 7 days in both the interruption and control groups (median [IQR], 7 [4-13] vs 7 [3-12]; interruption group hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.86-1.35; P = .52). Duration of ICU stay (median [IQR], 10 [5-17] days vs 10 [6-20] days; P = .36) and hospital stay (median [IQR], 20 [10-36] days vs 20 [10-48] days; P = .42) did not differ between the daily interruption and control groups, respectively. Daily interruption was associated with higher mean daily doses of midazolam (102 mg/d vs 82 mg/d; P = .04) and fentanyl (median [IQR], 550 [50-1850] vs 260 [0-1400]; P < .001) and more daily boluses of benzodiazepines (mean, 0.253 vs 0.177; P = .007) and opiates (mean, 2.18 vs 1.79; P < .001). Unintentional endotracheal tube removal occurred in 10 of 214 (4.7%) vs 12 of 207 patients (5.8%) in the interruption and control groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.36-1.84; P = .64). Rates of delirium were not significantly different between groups (53.3% vs 54.1%; relative risk, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.82-1.17; P = .83). Nurse workload was greater in the interruption group (VAS score, 4.22 vs 3.80; mean difference, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17-0.66; P = .001). CONCLUSION For mechanically ventilated adults managed with protocolized sedation, the addition of daily sedation interruption did not reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation or ICU stay. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00675363.

[1]  A. Delaney,et al.  Daily interruption of sedation in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. , 2011, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[2]  K. Ho,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials on Daily Sedation Interruption for Critically Ill Adult Patients , 2011, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[3]  J. Devlin,et al.  Predictors for daily interruption of sedation therapy by nurses: a prospective, multicenter study. , 2010, Journal of critical care.

[4]  O. Kutlay,et al.  The effect of nursing-implemented sedation on the duration of mechanical ventilation in the ICU. , 2010, Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES.

[5]  E. Manias,et al.  Sedation management in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units: doctors' and nurses' practices and opinions. , 2010, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[6]  Xin Sun,et al.  Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Stella Anifantaki,et al.  Daily interruption of sedative infusions in an adult medical-surgical intensive care unit: randomized controlled trial. , 2009, Journal of advanced nursing.

[8]  D. Cook,et al.  A Prospective Evaluation of Sedative, Analgesic, Anti-Psychotic and Paralytic Practices in Canadian Mechanically Ventilated Adults. , 2009, ATS 2009.

[9]  J. Devlin,et al.  Perceived barriers to the use of sedation protocols and daily sedation interruption: a multidisciplinary survey. , 2009, Journal of critical care.

[10]  G. Bernard,et al.  Delirium and sedation in the intensive care unit: Survey of behaviors and attitudes of 1384 healthcare professionals* , 2009, Critical care medicine.

[11]  E. Ruokonen,et al.  Dexmedetomidine versus propofol/midazolam for long-term sedation during mechanical ventilation , 2009, Intensive Care Medicine.

[12]  D. Cook,et al.  A randomized trial of daily awakening in critically ill patients managed with a sedation protocol: A pilot trial* , 2008, Critical care medicine.

[13]  C. Gennings,et al.  Randomized trial comparing daily interruption of sedation and nursing-implemented sedation algorithm in medical intensive care unit patients , 2008, Critical care.

[14]  E. Manias,et al.  A randomized trial of protocol-directed sedation management for mechanical ventilation in an Australian intensive care unit* , 2008, Critical care medicine.

[15]  A. Anzueto,et al.  Use of sedatives, opioids, and neuromuscular blocking agents in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome* , 2008, Critical care medicine.

[16]  G. Bernard,et al.  Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (Awakening and Breathing Controlled trial): a randomised controlled trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[17]  B. Erstad,et al.  Opioid Conversions in Acute Care , 2007, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[18]  Sangeeta Mehta,et al.  Canadian survey of the use of sedatives, analgesics, and neuromuscular blocking agents in critically ill patients* , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[19]  S. Gottfried,et al.  Incidence, risk factors and consequences of ICU delirium , 2006, Intensive Care Medicine.

[20]  C. Sessler,et al.  The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. , 2002, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[21]  Philip D Lumb,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult. , 2002, Critical care medicine.

[22]  Y. Skrobik,et al.  Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist: evaluation of a new screening tool , 2001, Intensive Care Medicine.

[23]  J. Kress,et al.  Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  G Sherman,et al.  Effect of a nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the duration of mechanical ventilation. , 1999, Critical care medicine.

[25]  G. Fraser,et al.  Prospective evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients. , 1999, Critical care medicine.

[26]  G Sherman,et al.  The use of continuous i.v. sedation is associated with prolongation of mechanical ventilation. , 1998, Chest.