Some ECMR properties in relation to other signals from the auditory periphery

Some basic characteristics of monkey and human acoustic emissions are reviewed and some new data presented. These characteristics are discussed in relation to the sensorineural output of the cochlea. Input--output functions and the frequency dispersal in the waveform of acoustic emissions (AE) from monkeys are described. New findings include changes in the human AE during trains of clicks and sustained suppression of the AE after short bursts of noise of moderate intensity. The similarly of click-evoked AE latencies and whole-nerve action potential (AP) latencies for low stimulus level toneburst stimuli, and the apparent discrepancy between these latencies and those of single cochlear nerve-fibre action potentials and derived impulse responses is discussed. It is argued that at low stimulus levels AE are generated either coincident with the primary cochlear impulse or very soon afterwards. It is proposed that the AE generator is peripheral to the afferent synapse of the inner hair cells because of the lack of adaptation effects in AE. However, attention is drawn to changes in the waveform of the click-evoked AE with increasing stimulus intensity and with diuretic intoxication, that qualitatively parallel known changes in single nerve-fibre firing properties. These observations are consistent with the concept that AE are a product of a sharply tuned and vulnerable cochlear filter mechanism.

[1]  R. Smith Short-term adaptation in single auditory nerve fibers: some poststimulatory effects. , 1977 .

[2]  J. P. Wilson,et al.  Model for cochlear echoes and tinnitus based on an observed electrical correlate , 1980, Hearing Research.

[3]  W. S. Rhode Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  A. Møller,et al.  Frequency selectivity of single auditory-nerve fibers in response to broadband noise stimuli. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  A. Salt,et al.  Effects of noise on cochlear potentials and endolymph potassium concentration recorded with potassium-selective electrodes , 1979, Hearing Research.

[6]  C D Geisler,et al.  Transient response of the basilar membrane measured in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer effect. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Peter Dallos,et al.  The Auditory Periphery Biophysics and Physiology , 1973 .

[8]  J J Eggermont,et al.  Electrocochleography and Recruitment , 1977, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[9]  E. de Boer,et al.  On cochlear encoding: Potentialities and limitations of the reverse‐correlation technique , 1978 .

[10]  I. Thalmann,et al.  Effect of Ethacrynic Acid, Furosemide, and Ouabain Upon the Endolymphatic Potential and Upon High Energy Phosphates of the Stria Vascularis , 1978, The Laryngoscope.

[11]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Some observations on cochlear mechanics. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Peter R. Gray A statistical analysis of electrophysiological data from auditory nerve fibers in cat. , 1966 .

[13]  W. L. C. Rutten,et al.  Evoked acoustic emissions from within normal and abnormal human ears: Comparison with audiometric and electrocochleographic findings , 1980, Hearing Research.

[14]  P. Sellick,et al.  Tuning properties of cochlear hair cells , 1977, Nature.

[15]  Donald C. Teas,et al.  Auditory Nerve Responses as a Function of Repetition Rate and Background Noise , 1969 .

[16]  D. Kemp Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  D. O. Kim Cochlear mechanics: Implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations , 1980, Hearing Research.

[18]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Nonlinear mechanical behaviour of the basilar membrane in the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea , 1980, Hearing Research.

[19]  D O Kim,et al.  Response patterns of single cochlear nerve fibers to click stimuli: descriptions for cat. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  P. Gray Conditional probability analyses of the spike activity of single neurons. , 1967, Biophysical journal.

[21]  D. T. Kemp,et al.  Towards a model for the origin of cochlear echoes , 1980, Hearing Research.

[22]  R. J. Ritsma,et al.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from the human ear , 1979 .

[23]  H. Duifhuis Consequences of peripheral frequency selectivity for nonsimultaneous masking. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  A. J. Goldstein Permeability of the Organ of Corti , 1973, Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology.

[25]  M B Sachs,et al.  Recovery from sound exposure in auditory-nerve fibers. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  A. Møller Dynamic properties of primary auditory fibers compared with cells in the cochlear nucleus. , 1976, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[27]  H. G. Nilsson,et al.  INNER EAR IMPULSE RESPONSE AND BASILAR MEMBRANE MODELLING. , 1979 .

[28]  A. Coats,et al.  Normal short-latency electrophysiological filtered click responses recorded from vertex and external auditory meatus. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  P. Dallos Comments on the Differential‐Electrode Technique , 1969 .

[30]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  NONLINEAR EFFECTS IN THE TRANSIENT RESPONSE OF THE BASILAR MEMBRANE. , 1974 .

[31]  J. Zakrisson The effect of the stapedius reflex on attenuation and poststimulatory auditory fatigue at different frequencies. , 1979, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[32]  C. Norris,et al.  The site at which peripheral auditory adaptation occurs , 1977, Brain Research.

[33]  R. J. Ritsma,et al.  Evoked acoustical responses from the human ear: Some experimental results , 1980, Hearing Research.

[34]  J. E. Rose,et al.  Some effects of stimulus intensity on response of auditory nerve fibers in the squirrel monkey. , 1971, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  R. R. Pfeiffer,et al.  CONSIDERATIONS OF NONLINEAR RESPONSE PROPERTIES OF SINGLE COCHLEAR NERVE FIBERS , 1973 .

[36]  David J. Anderson,et al.  Temporal Position of Discharges in Single Auditory Nerve Fibers within the Cycle of a Sine‐Wave Stimulus: Frequency and Intensity Effects , 1971 .

[37]  J J Eggermont,et al.  Narrow-band AP latencies in normal and recruiting human ears. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  D O Kim,et al.  Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  D. T. Kemp,et al.  Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions , 1980, Hearing Research.

[40]  J. P. Wilson,et al.  Evidence for a cochlear origin for acoustic re-emissions, threshold fine-structure and tonal tinnitus , 1980, Hearing Research.

[41]  B. Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Neural correlates of auditory fatigue: frequency-dependent changes in activity of single cochlear nerve fibers. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  E deBoer,et al.  Travelling waves and cochlear resonance. , 1979 .