Genomic Signatures of Cooperation and Conflict in the Social Amoeba

Cooperative systems are susceptible to invasion by selfish individuals that profit from receiving the social benefits but fail to contribute. These so-called "cheaters" can have a fitness advantage in the laboratory, but it is unclear whether cheating provides an important selective advantage in nature. We used a population genomic approach to examine the history of genes involved in cheating behaviors in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum, testing whether these genes experience rapid evolutionary change as a result of conflict over spore-stalk fate. Candidate genes and surrounding regions showed elevated polymorphism, unusual patterns of linkage disequilibrium, and lower levels of population differentiation, but they did not show greater between-species divergence. The signatures were most consistent with frequency-dependent selection acting to maintain multiple alleles, suggesting that conflict may lead to stalemate rather than an escalating arms race. Our results reveal the evolutionary dynamics of cooperation and cheating and underscore how sequence-based approaches can be used to elucidate the history of conflicts that are difficult to observe directly.

[1]  C. Hauert,et al.  The Evolutionary Origin of Cooperators and Defectors , 2004, Science.

[2]  Frédéric Delsuc,et al.  MACSE: Multiple Alignment of Coding SEquences Accounting for Frameshifts and Stop Codons , 2011, PloS one.

[3]  Lior Pachter,et al.  Sequence Analysis , 2020, Definitions.

[4]  S. Glémin,et al.  Balancing Selection in the Wild: Testing Population Genetics Theory of Self-Incompatibility in the Rare Species Brassica insularis , 2005, Genetics.

[5]  Shane S. Sturrock,et al.  Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data , 2012, Bioinform..

[6]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Evolution of cooperation and control of cheating in a social microbe , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  D. Queller,et al.  Expanded social fitness and Hamilton's rule for kin, kith, and kind , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  D. Hosken,et al.  Sexual conflict , 2005, Current Biology.

[9]  M. Wade,et al.  Detecting the Molecular Signature of Social Conflict: Theory and a Test with Bacterial Quorum Sensing Genes , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[10]  R. MacLean,et al.  Resource competition and social conflict in experimental populations of yeast , 2006, Nature.

[11]  Ziheng Yang.  PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.

[12]  Blaz Zupan,et al.  Conserved developmental transcriptomes in evolutionarily divergent species , 2010, Genome Biology.

[13]  M. Wade,et al.  Kin Selection–Mutation Balance: A Model for the Origin, Maintenance, and Consequences of Social Cheating , 2011, American Naturalist.

[14]  D. Brutlag,et al.  Dynamic use of multiple parameter sets in sequence alignment , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  M. Kreitman,et al.  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila , 1991, Nature.

[16]  Sofia M. C. Robb,et al.  MAKER: an easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes. , 2007, Genome research.

[17]  W. J. Kent,et al.  BLAT--the BLAST-like alignment tool. , 2002, Genome research.

[18]  T. Markow,et al.  Diversity-Enhancing Selection Acts on a Female Reproductive Protease Family in Four Subspecies of Drosophila mojavensis , 2011, Genetics.

[19]  A. Buckling,et al.  Coevolution between Cooperators and Cheats in a Microbial System , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  B. Hollis,et al.  Rapid antagonistic coevolution between strains of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Kevin R Foster,et al.  High relatedness maintains multicellular cooperation in a social amoeba by controlling cheater mutants , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  M. Shriver,et al.  Interrogating a high-density SNP map for signatures of natural selection. , 2002, Genome research.

[23]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Altruism and social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2000, Nature.

[24]  A. Griffin,et al.  Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations , 2007, Nature.

[25]  W. Rice,et al.  The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[26]  David Murrell,et al.  Frequency-dependent advantages of plasmid carriage by Pseudomonas in homogeneous and spatially structured environments , 2007, The ISME Journal.

[27]  Jeffrey D. Wall,et al.  Recombination and the power of statistical tests of neutrality , 1999 .

[28]  Tracey Chapman,et al.  Running with the Red Queen: the role of biotic conflicts in evolution , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Jason B. Wolf,et al.  Quantification of Social Behavior in D. discoideum Reveals Complex Fixed and Facultative Strategies , 2009, Current Biology.

[30]  Adam Kuspa,et al.  Cheater-resistance is not futile , 2009, Nature.

[31]  Mario Stanke,et al.  Gene prediction with a hidden Markov model and a new intron submodel , 2003, ECCB.

[32]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Group-beneficial traits, frequency-dependent selection and genotypic diversity: an antibiotic resistance paradigm , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[34]  D. Charlesworth,et al.  High Diversity Due to Balancing Selection in the Promoter Region of the Medea Gene in Arabidopsis lyrata , 2007, Current Biology.

[35]  Current Biology , 2012, Current Biology.

[36]  Ian Korf,et al.  Gene finding in novel genomes , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[37]  W. Swanson,et al.  Evidence of amino acid diversity-enhancing selection within humans and among primates at the candidate sperm-receptor gene PKDREJ. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[38]  S. Emlen,et al.  Parent–offspring conflict , 1992, Nature.

[39]  V. Nanjundiah,et al.  Interspecies and intraspecies interactions in social amoebae , 2014, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[40]  E. Stahl,et al.  Dynamics of disease resistance polymorphism at the Rpm1 locus of Arabidopsis , 1999, Nature.

[41]  N. Takebayashi,et al.  Possible diversifying selection in the imprinted gene, MEDEA, in Arabidopsis. , 2009, Molecular biology and evolution.

[42]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[43]  Erik L. L. Sonnhammer,et al.  Inparanoid: a comprehensive database of eukaryotic orthologs , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[44]  Andy Gardner,et al.  Frequency Dependence and Cooperation: Theory and a Test with Bacteria , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[45]  G. Weinstock,et al.  A SNP discovery method to assess variant allele probability from next-generation resequencing data. , 2010, Genome research.

[46]  M. Wade,et al.  Genes with Social Effects are Expected to Harbor More Sequence Variation within and Between Species , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[47]  D. E. Matthews.  Evolution and the Theory of Games , 1977 .

[48]  Anup Parikh,et al.  Facultative cheater mutants reveal the genetic complexity of cooperation in social amoebae , 2008, Nature.