Scales and spatio-temporal dimensions in landscape research

The human factor ‘land use’ affects the interactions between water, soil, geomorphology, vegetation, etc. on several spatial and temporal scales in different manners and intensities. The implementation of strategies for sustainable land use assumes specific research concepts from the local to the global scale (micro-, meso- and macroscale). Therefore, landscape ecology science has to provide investigation methods for all these different scales. A number of papers from different scientific disciplines deal with the hierarchical organization of nature (Burns et al. 1991, O’Neill et al. 1986). The hierarchical concept was introduced into German landscape ecology by Neef (1963, 1967) and continued by several other landscape ecologists (Leser 1997). An overview of hierarchical concepts in landscape ecology is given by Klijn (1995). These concepts are mainly focused on the hypothesis, that each of the scale levels (micro-, meso- and macroscale) is characterized by specific temporal and spatial ranges. As a consequence, each scale level needs specific investigation methods as well as data layers with suitable spatio-temporal resolution on the one hand, and which provide specific knowledge on the other (Steinhardt & Volk 2000).

[1]  Uta Steinhardt,et al.  Die Theorie der geographischen Dimensionen in der Angewandten Landschaftsökologie , 1999 .

[2]  Robert G. Bailey,et al.  Explanatory Supplement to Ecoregions Map of the Continents , 1989, Environmental Conservation.

[3]  H. Jenny,et al.  Factors of Soil Formation , 1941 .

[4]  Jian-guo Wu Hierarchy and scaling: Extrapolating informa-tion along a scaling ladder , 1999 .

[5]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Skalenaspekte der Bodenerosion , 1999 .

[6]  R. O'Neill A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. , 1986 .

[7]  M. Volk,et al.  Regionalisierung in der Landschaftsökologie , 1999 .

[8]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  5 – Scaling Water Vapor and Carbon Dioxide Exchange from Leaves to a Canopy: Rules and Tools , 1993 .

[9]  R. Gardner,et al.  Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology , 1991 .

[10]  Michael R. Moss,et al.  Landscape synthesis, landscape processes and land classification, some theoretical and methodological issues , 1983 .

[11]  Francesco di Castri,et al.  Enhancing the credibility of ecology: Interacting along and across hierarchical scales , 1988 .

[12]  M. Tapkenhinrichs,et al.  Evaluation of Pedo-Transfer Functions , 1993 .

[13]  P. Matson,et al.  Natural Disturbance and Nitrogen Mineralization: Wave-Form Dieback of Mountain Hemlock in the Oregon Cascades , 1984 .

[14]  R. Bailey Delineation of ecosystem regions , 1983 .

[15]  M. Goodchild,et al.  Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS , 2023 .

[16]  J. Schultz The ecozones of the world , 1995 .

[17]  J. Smuts Holism and Evolution , 1926 .

[18]  H. König,et al.  Grundlagen und Methoden , 1976 .

[19]  F. E. Egler Vegetation as an Object of Study , 1942, Philosophy of Science.

[20]  A Koestler,et al.  Ghost in the Machine , 1970 .

[21]  Paul G. Risser,et al.  Scales and Global Change. , 1989 .

[22]  Stanley N. Salthe,et al.  TWO FORMS OF HIERARCHY THEORY IN WESTERN DISCOURSES , 1991 .

[23]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Quantitative methods in landscape ecology : the analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity , 1991 .

[24]  R. Mellor,et al.  Die Theoretischen Grundlagen der Landschaftslehre , 1968 .

[25]  R. Webster,et al.  Kriging: a method of interpolation for geographical information systems , 1990, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[26]  D. Quattrochi,et al.  Scale, Multiscaling, Remote Sensing, and GIS , 1997 .

[27]  J. Rowe The Level‐of‐Integration Concept and Ecology , 1961 .

[28]  Marc F. P. Bierkens,et al.  Upscaling and downscaling methods for environmental research , 2000 .

[29]  C. Field,et al.  Scaling physiological processes: leaf to globe. , 1995 .

[30]  R. V. O'Neill,et al.  10. Perspectives in Hierarchy and Scale , 1989 .

[31]  P. Burrough Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment , 1986 .