Analysis of Human Grasping Behavior: Correlating Tasks, Objects and Grasps

This paper is the second in a two-part series analyzing human grasping behavior during a wide range of unstructured tasks. It investigates the tasks performed during the daily work of two housekeepers and two machinists and correlates grasp type and object properties with the attributes of the tasks being performed. The task or activity is classified according to the force required, the degrees of freedom, and the functional task type. We found that 46 percent of tasks are constrained, where the manipulated object is not allowed to move in a full six degrees of freedom. Analyzing the interrelationships between the grasp, object, and task data show that the best predictors of the grasp type are object size, task constraints, and object mass. Using these attributes, the grasp type can be predicted with 47 percent accuracy. Those parameters likely make useful heuristics for grasp planning systems. The results further suggest the common sub-categorization of grasps into power, intermediate, and precision categories may not be appropriate, indicating that grasps are generally more multi-functional than previously thought. We find large and heavy objects are grasped with a power grasp, but small and lightweight objects are not necessarily grasped with precision grasps-even with grasped object size less than 2 cm and mass less than 20 g, precision grasps are only used 61 percent of the time. These results have important implications for robotic hand design and grasp planners, since it appears while power grasps are frequently used for heavy objects, they can still be quite practical for small, lightweight objects.

[1]  Yoshifumi Nishida,et al.  A concept of needs-oriented design and evaluation of assistive robots based on ICF , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[2]  M. E. McCarty,et al.  Reaching beyond spatial perception: Effects of intended future actions on visually guided prehension , 2004 .

[3]  S. Katz,et al.  STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION. , 1963, JAMA.

[4]  Steven Salzberg,et al.  Programs for Machine Learning , 2004 .

[5]  J. Napier The prehensile movements of the human hand. , 1956, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  Thomas Feix,et al.  A comprehensive grasp taxonomy , 2009 .

[7]  Aaron M. Dollar,et al.  An investigation of grasp type and frequency in daily household and machine shop tasks , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Leonard S. Haynes,et al.  Robotic assembly by constraints , 1986, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Aaron M. Dollar,et al.  The Yale human grasping dataset: Grasp, object, and task data in household and machine shop environments , 2015, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[10]  M. T. J. Buñuales,et al.  La clasificación internacional del funcionamiento de la discapacidad y de la salud (CIF) 2001 , 2002 .

[11]  N. Kamakura,et al.  Patterns of static prehension in normal hands. , 1980, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[12]  Luca Turella,et al.  An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[14]  Henry Dreyfuss,et al.  Measure of Man and Woman: Human Factors in Design , 1993 .

[15]  A. J. Conger Kappa Reliabilities for Continuous Behaviors and Events , 1985 .

[16]  Henry A. Kautz,et al.  Inferring activities from interactions with objects , 2004, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[17]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Advance planning in sequential pick-and-place tasks. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .

[19]  R. Cohen,et al.  Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Aaron M. Dollar,et al.  Analysis of Human Grasping Behavior: Object Characteristics and Grasp Type , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[21]  P. Haggard Planning of action sequences , 1998 .

[22]  Rakesh Agarwal,et al.  Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules , 1994, VLDB 1994.

[23]  Pradeep K. Khosla,et al.  Manipulation task primitives for composing robot skills , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[24]  M. Santello,et al.  Effects of end-goal on hand shaping. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  D. Kibler,et al.  Instance-based learning algorithms , 2004, Machine Learning.

[26]  B. P. McCloskey,et al.  Knowledge about hand shaping and knowledge about objects. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[27]  Tobias Scheffer Finding association rules that trade support optimally against confidence , 2005 .

[28]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[29]  I. Hartigan,et al.  A comparative review of the Katz ADL and the Barthel Index in assessing the activities of daily living of older people. , 2007, International journal of older people nursing.

[30]  Aaron M. Dollar,et al.  Grasp Frequency and Usage in Daily Household and Machine Shop Tasks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.