EXPLAINING RADICAL POLICY CHANGE: THE CASE OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY POLICY UNDER THE BRITISH LABOUR GOVERNMENT 2006–10

An innovative framework combining the ‘multiple streams’ (MS) and ‘punctuated equilibrium’ (PE) models of agenda-setting is used to explain the transformation of UK climate change and energy policy under the Labour Government between 2006 and 2010. The coupling of the problem, politics and policy streams by policy entrepreneurs (MS), and changes in policy image and institutional venues (PE), were critical in opening a policy window, disrupting the existing policy monopoly and enabling radical policy initiatives. The case study suggests two revisions to the models: (1) policy windows can remain open far longer than either model typically predicts; and (2) party politics, especially where party competition generates a ‘competitive consensus’, can be important for both initiating and prolonging policy change in parliamentary systems. An important factor typically overlooked by both models is the significant policy entrepreneurship role that government ministers can play, particularly when an issue becomes part of their ‘narrative identity’.

[1]  Christoffer Green-Pedersen,et al.  Immigration as a political issue in Denmark and Sweden , 2008 .

[2]  Steffen Brunner.  Understanding policy change: Multiple streams and emissions trading in Germany , 2008 .

[3]  Michael Mintrom,et al.  Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Change , 2009 .

[4]  Shaun Bevan,et al.  What Are Policy Punctuations? Large Changes in the Legislative Agenda of the UK Government, 1911–2008 , 2012 .

[5]  P. John.  Explaining policy change: the impact of the media, public opinion and political violence on urban budgets in England1 , 2006 .

[6]  Bryan D. Jones,et al.  Comparative studies of policy agendas , 2006 .

[7]  G. Busenberg.  The evolution of vigilance: Disasters, sentinels and policy change , 1999 .

[8]  S. Walgrave,et al.  Punctuated Equilibrium and Agenda-Setting: Bringing Parties Back in: Policy Change after the Dutroux Crisis in Belgium , 2008 .

[9]  M. Mintrom,et al.  Advocacy Coalitions, Policy Entrepreneurs, and Policy Change , 1996 .

[10]  C. Lindblom.  THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[11]  W. Solecki,et al.  Pollution, Political Agendas, and Policy Windows: Environmental Policy on the Eve of Silent Spring , 1996 .

[12]  N. Carter.  Party Politicization Of The Environment In Britain , 2006 .

[13]  Sarah B. Pralle.  Timing and sequence in agenda-setting and policy change: a comparative study of lawn care pesticide politics in Canada and the US , 2006 .

[14]  N. Gavin.  Addressing climate change: a media perspective , 2009 .

[15]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective , 2007 .

[16]  Brian W. Hogwood,et al.  In Search of the Issue-Attention Cycle , 1985, The Journal of Politics.

[17]  Shaun Bevan,et al.  What are Policy Punctuations? Large Changes in the Legislative Agenda of the UK Government, 1911-2008 , 2011 .

[18]  P. John,et al.  The Agenda of British Government: The Speech from the Throne, 1911-2008 , 2011 .

[19]  C. Green-Pedersen,et al.  The Institutionalization of Environmental Attention in the United States and Denmark: Multiple‐ versus Single‐Venue Systems , 2009 .

[20]  N. Carter.  Vote Blue, Go Green? Cameron's Conservatives and the Environment , 2009 .