Codon usage in twelve species of Drosophila

BackgroundCodon usage bias (CUB), the uneven use of synonymous codons, is a ubiquitous observation in virtually all organisms examined. The pattern of codon usage is generally similar among closely related species, but differs significantly among distantly related organisms, e.g., bacteria, yeast, and Drosophila. Several explanations for CUB have been offered and some have been supported by observations and experiments, although a thorough understanding of the evolutionary forces (random drift, mutation bias, and selection) and their relative importance remains to be determined. The recently available complete genome DNA sequences of twelve phylogenetically defined species of Drosophila offer a hitherto unprecedented opportunity to examine these problems. We report here the patterns of codon usage in the twelve species and offer insights on possible evolutionary forces involved.Results(1) Codon usage is quite stable across 11/12 of the species: G- and especially C-ending codons are used most frequently, thus defining the preferred codons. (2) The only amino acid that changes in preferred codon is Serine with six species of the melanogaster group favoring TCC while the other species, particularly subgenus Drosophila species, favor AGC. (3) D. willistoni is an exception to these generalizations in having a shifted codon usage for seven amino acids toward A/T in the wobble position. (4) Amino acids differ in their contribution to overall CUB, Leu having the greatest and Asp the least. (5) Among two-fold degenerate amino acids, A/G ending amino acids have more selection on codon usage than T/C ending amino acids. (6) Among the different chromosome arms or elements, genes on the non-recombining element F (dot chromosome) have the least CUB, while genes on the element A (X chromosome) have the most. (7) Introns indicate that mutation bias in all species is approximately 2:1, AT:GC, the opposite of codon usage bias. (8) There is also evidence for some overall regional bias in base composition that may influence codon usage.ConclusionOverall, these results suggest that natural selection has acted on codon usage in the genus Drosophila, at least often enough to leave a footprint of selection in modern genomes. However, there is evidence in the data that random forces (drift and mutation) have also left patterns in the data, especially in genes under weak selection for codon usage for example genes in regions of low recombination. The documentation of codon usage patterns in each of these twelve genomes also aids in ongoing annotation efforts.

[1]  Giorgio Bernardi,et al.  Correlations between the compositional properties of human genes, codon usage, and amino acid composition of proteins , 1991, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[2]  Julian Huxley,et al.  The new systematics , 1941 .

[3]  D C Shields,et al.  "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. , 1988, Molecular biology and evolution.

[4]  W. Fiers,et al.  On codon usage , 1979, Nature.

[5]  Casey M. Bergman,et al.  Combined Evidence Annotation of Transposable Elements in Genome Sequences , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[6]  D. Hartl,et al.  Codon usage bias and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila. , 1993, Genetics.

[7]  Hiroshi Akashi,et al.  Translational selection and yeast proteome evolution. , 2003, Genetics.

[8]  F. Ayala,et al.  Enzyme Variability in the Drosophila willistoni GroupVIII. Genetic differentiation and reproductive isolation between two subspecies , 1973 .

[9]  C. W. Hinton Handbook of Genetics: Volume 3. Invertebrates of Genetic Interest , 1976 .

[10]  Jeffrey R. Powell,et al.  Progress and Prospects in Evolutionary Biology: The Drosophila Model , 1997 .

[11]  Colin N. Dewey,et al.  Discovery of functional elements in 12 Drosophila genomes using evolutionary signatures , 2007, Nature.

[12]  H. Akashi,et al.  Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster. , 1996, Genetics.

[13]  S. Schaeffer,et al.  Estimates of gene flow in Drosophila pseudoobscura determined from nucleotide sequence analysis of the alcohol dehydrogenase region. , 1992, Genetics.

[14]  A. Pavesi,et al.  Transfer RNA gene redundancy and translational selection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  E. Novitski,et al.  The Homologies of the Chromosome Elements in the Genus Drosophila. , 1941, Genetics.

[16]  J. Powell,et al.  Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[17]  M. Aguadé,et al.  Natural selection on synonymous sites is correlated with gene length and recombination in Drosophila. , 1999, Genetics.

[18]  L. Duret,et al.  Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  M. Papaceit,et al.  Fate of dot chromosome genes in Drosophila willistoni and Scaptodrosophila lebanonensis determined by in situ hybridization , 2004, Chromosome Research.

[20]  F. E. Clayton,et al.  A Catalog of Drosophila Metaphase Chromosome Configurations , 1975 .

[21]  Wolfgang Stephan,et al.  In vivo introduction of unpreferred synonymous codons into the Drosophila Adh gene results in reduced levels of ADH protein. , 2003, Genetics.

[22]  H. Lasker,et al.  Phylogeography and morphological variation of the branching octocoral Pseudopterogorgia elisabethae. , 2009, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[23]  J. Powell,et al.  Evolution of codon usage bias in Drosophila. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Etsuko N. Moriyama,et al.  Analysis of a Shift in Codon Usage in Drosophila , 2003, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[25]  A. Nekrutenko,et al.  Assessment of compositional heterogeneity within and between eukaryotic genomes. , 2000, Genome research.

[26]  Francisco J. Ayala,et al.  Fluctuating Mutation Bias and the Evolution of Base Composition in Drosophila , 2000, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[27]  T. Ohta THE NEARLY NEUTRAL THEORY OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION , 1992 .

[28]  Etsuko N. Moriyama,et al.  Codon Usage Bias and tRNA Abundance in Drosophila , 1997, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[29]  G. Bernardi,et al.  The isochore organization of the human genome. , 1989, Annual review of genetics.

[30]  F. Wright The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene. , 1990, Gene.

[31]  F J Ayala,et al.  Tree rooting with outgroups when they differ in their nucleotide composition from the ingroup: the Drosophila saltans and willistoni groups, a case study. , 2000, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[32]  T. Ikemura Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  M. Kreitman,et al.  Population, evolutionary and genomic consequences of interference selection. , 2002, Genetics.

[34]  Melanie A. Huntley,et al.  Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny , 2007, Nature.

[35]  A. Betancourt,et al.  Linkage limits the power of natural selection in Drosophila , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  H. Akashi,et al.  Gene expression and molecular evolution. , 2001, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[37]  S. Schaeffer,et al.  Natural selection and the frequency distributions of "silent" DNA polymorphism in Drosophila. , 1997, Genetics.

[38]  P. Sharp,et al.  The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.

[39]  S. Elgin,et al.  The fourth chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster: interspersed euchromatic and heterochromatic domains. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  J. Powell,et al.  Adh Nucleotide Variation in Drosophila willistoni: High Replacement Polymorphism in an Electrophoretically Monomorphic Protein , 1997, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[41]  Kevin R. Thornton,et al.  Nucleotide Variation Along the Drosophila melanogaster Fourth Chromosome , 2002, Science.

[42]  Robert C. King,et al.  Handbook of Genetics , 1976, Springer US.

[43]  H. Akashi Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. , 1994, Genetics.

[44]  Dmitri A Petrov,et al.  Genomic Heterogeneity of Background Substitutional Patterns in Drosophila melanogaster , 2005, Genetics.

[45]  H. Akashi,et al.  Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA. , 1995, Genetics.

[46]  P Bernaola-Galván,et al.  Isochore chromosome maps of eukaryotic genomes. , 2001, Gene.

[47]  D. Petrov,et al.  X-Linked Genes Evolve Higher Codon Bias in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis , 2005, Genetics.

[48]  L. Duret,et al.  Neutral effect of recombination on base composition in Drosophila. , 2003, Genetical research.

[49]  J. Powell,et al.  Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. IV. Genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila willistoni. , 1972, Genetics.

[50]  T. Dobzhansky,et al.  THE WILLISTONI GROUP OF SIBLING SPECIES OF DROSOPHILA , 1949, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[51]  P. Sharp,et al.  Variation in the strength of selected codon usage bias among bacteria , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[52]  J. Powell,et al.  Evolution of the Adh locus in the Drosophila willistoni group: the loss of an intron, and shift in codon usage. , 1993, Molecular biology and evolution.

[53]  T. Keith Frequency Distribution of Esterase-5 Alleles in Two Populations of DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA. , 1983, Genetics.

[54]  R. Kliman Recent Selection on Synonymous Codon Usage in Drosophila , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[55]  D. Hartl,et al.  Selection intensity for codon bias. , 1994, Genetics.

[56]  J. Hey,et al.  Reduced natural selection associated with low recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1993, Molecular biology and evolution.

[57]  R. Thompson,et al.  Codon choice and gene expression: synonymous codons differ in translational accuracy. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  J. Hey,et al.  Hill-Robertson interference in Drosophila melanogaster: reply to Marais, Mouchiroud and Duret. , 2003, Genetical research.

[59]  G. Marais,et al.  Biased gene conversion: implications for genome and sex evolution. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[60]  G. M. Tener,et al.  Analysis of tRNAs during the development of Drosophila. , 1973, Developmental biology.