A Social Cognitive Conception of Social Structure

An adequate account of contemporary social structure must account for both the stabilities and the dynamics of social life. Because social structures are negotiated and redefined through individual action and interaction, models that facilitate connections between micro and macro levels of analysis are necessary in turn for a comprehensive account of social stability and change. Sociological social psychological theories such as social exchange and symbolic interaction address the interactive aspects of social behavior. The social cognition perspective, however, is uniquely qualified to address how social structure is represented, sustained, and transformed by the cognitive systems of human actors. Social cognitive conceptions of social structure are delineated through a selective discussion of social cognition and sociological models that implicate cognition. The relationships between cognition, agency, and structure are illustrated through analysis offour conceptual puzzles in order to reveal the analytic contribution of social cognition to understanding social structure. An adequate account of contemporary social structure must meet at least two criteria: 1) it must account not only for the stabilities of social life but also for the fluidities and the dynamics of its production, reproduction, and transformations; and 2) it must incorporate both the macro and the micro foundations of action. These agendas are related. Social structure constrains individuals through both preexisting institutions and the situated constraints imposed by other actors. Social structures also are continually negotiated and redefined through individual action and interaction. The individual and society are mutually constitutive. As Melucci (1989:46) argues, "society's capacity to

[1]  Audrey Smedley Race in North America: Origin and Evolution of a Worldview , 1994 .

[2]  Robin S Stryker,et al.  Rules, Resources, and Legitimacy Processes: Some Implications for Social Conflict, Order, and Change , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  N. Beisel Morals Versus Art: Censorship, The Politics of Interpretation, and the Victorian Nude , 1993 .

[4]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  The Social Construction of Status Value: Gender and Other Nominal Characteristics , 1991 .

[5]  R. Turner The use and misuse of rational models in collective behavior and social psychology , 1991, European Journal of Sociology.

[6]  V. Gecas The self–society dynamic: The self-concept as a basis for a theory of motivation , 1991 .

[7]  D. Morgan,et al.  Mind and self in society : linking social structure and social cognition , 1990 .

[8]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[9]  W. Sewell A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  K. Gergen,et al.  Texts of Identity , 1989 .

[11]  D. Boden MIND OVER MEAD: COLLINS' THEORY OF THOUGHT , 1989 .

[12]  R. Collins Toward A Neo‐Meadian Sociology of Mind , 1989 .

[13]  Clark McPhail,et al.  Meadian Versus Neo‐Meadian Theories of Mind* , 1989 .

[14]  D. Shalin Mead, Behaviorism and Indeterminacy , 1989 .

[15]  J. Lave Cognition in Practice: Outdoors: a social anthropology of cognition in practice , 1988 .

[16]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[17]  J. Potter,et al.  Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour , 1987 .

[18]  M. Schwalbe Mead Among the Cognitivists: Roles as Performance Imagery , 1987 .

[19]  H. Molotch,et al.  Talking Social Structure: Discourse, Domination and the Watergate Hearings , 1985 .

[20]  J. Crocker,et al.  Cognitive Processes in the Revision of Stereotypic Beliefs , 1983 .

[21]  B. Waller Mentalistic Problems in Cicourel's Cognitive Sociology , 1982 .

[22]  L. Fave,et al.  The Meek Shall Not Inherit the Earth: Self-Evaluation and the Legitimacy of Stratification , 1980 .

[23]  G. Gurin,et al.  Stratum identification and consciousness. , 1980 .

[24]  P. Blau Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure , 1978 .

[25]  B. Commins,et al.  The effects on intergroup relations of mixing Roman Catholics and Protestants: An experimental investigation , 1978 .

[26]  George Gonos "Situation" versus "Frame": The "Interactionist" and the "Structuralist" Analyses of Everyday Life , 1977 .

[27]  A. Giddens,et al.  New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. , 1977 .

[28]  J. House The three faces of social psychology. , 1977 .

[29]  A. Cicourel Cognitive sociology: language and meaning in social interaction , 1976 .

[30]  H. Garfinkel Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[31]  T. Abel,et al.  Mind, Self, and Society , 1934 .

[32]  Glynis M. Breakwell,et al.  Empirical Approaches to Social Representations , 1993 .

[33]  D. Hilton Conversational processes and causal explanation. , 1990 .

[34]  Alberto Melucci,et al.  Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society , 1989 .

[35]  R. Arkin,et al.  Self-Presentation and Self-Evaluation: Processes of Self-Control and Social Control , 1986 .

[36]  David A. Wilder,et al.  Social Categorization: Implications for Creation and Reduction of Intergroup Bias , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[37]  J. Darley,et al.  Constructing other persons: A limit on the effect , 1985 .

[38]  E. J. Bourne,et al.  Does the Concept of the Person Vary Cross-Culturally? , 1982 .

[39]  H. Tajfel Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[40]  J. Habermas,et al.  The Theory of Communicative Action , 1981 .

[41]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  SOME PRINCIPLES OF MEMORY SCHEMATA , 1975 .

[42]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .