Friedman's Research on Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic*

Publisher Summary This chapter focuses on Friedman's research on subsystems of second-order arithmetic, which can be examined from two related but essentially disparate points of view. On the one hand, such systems have many interesting meta-mathematical properties, which can be investigated using proof-theoretic and model-theoretic tools. On the other hand, subsystems of second-order arithmetic are a natural vehicle for the formal axiomatic study of ordinary mathematics. Ordinary mathematics comprises branches of mathematics—such as geometry, number theory, differential equations, algebra, and functional analysis. The chapter is concerned mainly with formal systems for the hyperarithmetical sets and represents a vast extension of the program of Reverse Mathematics. Reductionist programs, where a reductionist is anyone who proposes to reduce a large part of mathematics to some restricted set of “acceptable” principles, are also discussed.

[1]  Zygmunt Ratajczyk,et al.  Satisfaction Classes and Combinatorial Sentences Independent From PA , 1982, Math. Log. Q..

[2]  Jeff B. Paris,et al.  Initial segments of models of Peano's axioms , 1977 .

[3]  Stephen G. Simpson Sets Which Do Not Have Subsets of Every Higher Degree , 1978, J. Symb. Log..

[4]  Harvey M. Friedman,et al.  Set theoretic foundations for constructive analysis , 1977 .

[5]  Stephen G. Simpson,et al.  Set Theoretic Aspects of Atr0 , 1982 .

[6]  Jon Barwise,et al.  On recursively saturated models of arithmetic , 1975 .

[7]  Solomon Feferman,et al.  Systems of predicative analysis , 1964, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[8]  Harvey M. Friedman,et al.  A Strong Conservative Extension of Peano Arithmetic , 1980 .

[9]  S. C. Kleene,et al.  Quantification of number-theoretic functions , 1960 .

[10]  Alonzo Church,et al.  Formal definitions in the theory of ordinal numbers , 1937 .

[11]  Solomon Feferman,et al.  Proof theoretic equivalences between classical and constructive theories for analysis , 1981 .

[12]  Julia F. Knight,et al.  Expansions of models and turing degrees , 1982, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[13]  D. Hilbert Über das Unendliche , 1926 .

[14]  John R. Steel,et al.  Forcing with tagged trees , 1978 .

[15]  Stephen G. Simpson,et al.  A Finite Combinatorial Principle Which is Equivalent to the 1-Consistency of Predicative Analysis , 1982 .

[16]  W. Buchholz Iterated Inductive Definitions and Subsystems of Analysis: Recent Proof-theoretical Studies , 1981 .

[17]  Harvey M. Friedman Bar Induction and $\Pi^1_1-CA^1$ , 1969 .

[18]  Solomon Feferman,et al.  Theories of Finite Type Related to Mathematical Practice , 1977 .

[19]  Stephen G. Simpson,et al.  Which set existence axioms are needed to prove the Cauchy/Peano theorem for ordinary differential equations? , 1984, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[20]  G. Kreisel,et al.  The Axiom of Choice and the Class of Hyperarithmetic Functions , 1962 .

[21]  S. Kleene On the Forms of the Predicates in the Theory of Constructive Ordinals (Second Paper) , 1955 .

[22]  Clifford Spector,et al.  Recursive well-orderings , 1955, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[23]  Stephen G. Simpson,et al.  Countable algebra and set existence axioms , 1983, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[24]  Joseph Harrison,et al.  Recursive pseudo-well-orderings , 1968 .

[25]  Gerhard Jäger,et al.  The strength of admissibility without foundation , 1984, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[26]  J. Shepherdson,et al.  Effective procedures in field theory , 1956, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[27]  Stephen G. Simpson,et al.  On the role of Ramsey quantifiers in first order arithmetic , 1982, Journal of Symbolic Logic.