Wireless Coexistence of Cellular LBT Systems and BLE 5

The 2.4 GHz spectrum is home to several Radio Access Technologies (RATs), including ZigBee, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), and Wi-Fi. Accordingly, the technologies’ spectrum-sharing qualities have been extensively studied in literature. License-Assisted Access (LAA) Listen-Before-Talk (LBT) has been identified in technical reports as the foundation for the channel access mechanism for 5G New Radio-Unlicensed (NR-U) operating in the 2.4 GHz Industrial, Scientific, and Medical (ISM) band. The introduction of NR-U into this band raises new concerns regarding coexistence of the newcomer with traditional incumbents. This article reports an investigation of BLE 5 and cellular LBT coexisting systems by means of empirical evaluation. The importance of this study stems from that the studied LBT mechanism is indicative of how 5G NR-U would perform in the 2.4 GHz band. Tests were performed in conformity with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C63.27 standard for evaluation of wireless coexistence, and results were reported in terms of throughput and interframe delays. In accordance with the standard and under different BLE physical layers (PHYs) and LBT priority classes, three setups were investigated. These pertain to the three tiers of evaluation, which correspond to the criticality of the device under test. Results demonstrated how BLE throughput dropped as the intended-to-unintended signal ratio decreased, and LBT classes exhibited a diminishing effect as the class priority descended. Long Range BLE PHY was found to sustain longer gap times (i.e., delay) than the other two PHYs; however, it showed less susceptibility to interference. Results also demonstrated that low data rate BLE PHYs hindered the LBT throughput performance since they correspond to longer airtime durations.

[1]  Eduardo Baena,et al.  KQI Performance Evaluation of 3GPP LBT Priorities for Indoor Unlicensed Coexistence Scenarios , 2020, Electronics.

[2]  Morteza Mehrnoush,et al.  On the Fairness of Wi-Fi and LTE-LAA Coexistence , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking.

[3]  Stefano Tomasin,et al.  Requirements and Enablers of Advanced Healthcare Services over Future Cellular Systems , 2019, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  Seth J. Seidman,et al.  5-GHz Band LTE-LAA Signal Selection for Use as the Unintended Signal in ANSI C63.27 Wireless Coexistence Testing , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[5]  Majid Nabi,et al.  Analysis of coexistence between IEEE 802.15.4, BLE and IEEE 802.11 in the 2.4 GHz ISM band , 2016, IECON 2016 - 42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[6]  Yuwei Chen,et al.  The evaluation of WiFi positioning in a Bluetooth and WiFi coexistence environment , 2012, 2012 Ubiquitous Positioning, Indoor Navigation, and Location Based Service (UPINLBS).

[7]  I. Howitt,et al.  Empirical study for IEEE 802.11 and Bluetooth interoperability , 2001, IEEE VTS 53rd Vehicular Technology Conference, Spring 2001. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37202).

[8]  Hazem H. Refai,et al.  On the performance of WLAN and Bluetooth for in-car infotainment systems , 2017, Veh. Commun..

[9]  Marwan Krunz,et al.  On Modeling and Optimizing LTE/Wi-Fi Coexistence with Prioritized Traffic Classes , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN).

[10]  Seth J. Seidman,et al.  Wireless Coexistence Testing in the 5 GHz Band with LTE-LAA Signals , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Signal & Power Integrity (EMC+SIPI).

[11]  Ozan K. Tonguz,et al.  An empirical performance study of Intra-vehicular Wireless Sensor Networks under WiFi and Bluetooth interference , 2013, 2013 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[12]  Modris Greitans,et al.  Bluetooth Low Energy Throughput in Densely Deployed Radio Environment , 2019, 2019 23rd International Conference Electronics.

[13]  Stefano Avallone,et al.  On a fair coexistence of LTE and Wi-Fi in the unlicensed spectrum: A Survey , 2018, Comput. Commun..

[14]  Hazem H. Refai,et al.  Bluetooth and IEEE 802.11n System Coexistence in the Automotive Domain , 2017, 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[15]  Thomas Engel,et al.  Bluetooth Low Energy performance and robustness analysis for Inter-Vehicular Communications , 2016, Ad Hoc Networks.

[16]  Morteza Mehrnoush,et al.  Analytical Modeling of Wi-Fi and LTE-LAA Coexistence: Throughput and Impact of Energy Detection Threshold , 2018, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[17]  Bin Yu,et al.  Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) based mobile electrocardiogram monitoring system , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation.

[18]  Konstantin Mikhaylov,et al.  Experimental Performance Evaluation of BLE 4 Versus BLE 5 in Indoors and Outdoors Scenarios , 2018, Advances in Body Area Networks I.

[19]  Shih-Lun Chen,et al.  A Low-Power High-Data-Transmission Multi-Lead ECG Acquisition Sensor System , 2019, Sensors.

[20]  David López-Pérez,et al.  IEEE 802.11be Extremely High Throughput: The Next Generation of Wi-Fi Technology Beyond 802.11ax , 2019, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[21]  Marwan Krunz,et al.  5G New Radio Unlicensed: Challenges and Evaluation , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking.

[22]  5G NR-U: Homogeneous Coexistence Analysis , 2020, GLOBECOM 2020 - 2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference.

[23]  Kay Römer,et al.  Performance and Trade-offs of the new PHY Modes of BLE 5 , 2019, PERSIST-IoT '19.