Multistability in large scale models of brain activity

Rich spatiotemporal dynamical patterns, observed in the brain at rest, reveal several large-scale functional networks, presumably involved in different brain functions. In parallel, structural networks obtained by Diffusion Spectrum Imaging ("connectome") identify several interconnected sub-networks that overlap with the functional networks [3]. Neural mass model simulations aim at developing realistic models of the brain activity. In particular, multiple fixed-point attractors can be identified and spontaneous alternation between several brain "states" can be obtained [2]. The number and the organization of the "fixed-point" attractors strongly vary depending of the parameters used in the model. In order to provide a general view of connectome-based dynamical systems, we developed a simplified neural mass model inspired by the continuous Hopfield network [4], to which we add a stochastic component, and a dynamic threshold (eq.2) that prevents reaching the two trivial attractors of system (eq.1). τdxidt=-xi+∑j=1NWi,jφxj,γ,θ+σ2ηi(t) (1) τθdθdt=-θ+ΩN∑i=1Nφxi,γ,θ (2) φxi,γ,θ=121+tanhγxi-θ (3) where W is the N = 66 nodes human connectome [3], x is the node potential, φ is the node output, θ is the adaptive threshold, η(t) is a white noise and σ the diffusion parameter. Three main parameters (excitation strength ||W||, inhibition strength Ω and node excitability γ) are systematically varied in order to identify the fixed points attractors of the dynamics (Figure ​(Figure11). Figure 1 Number of attractors obtained for different (Ω, ||W||) couples with γ = 30. Attractor patterns isodensity lines are indicated in black The adaptive threshold plays the role of a global inhibition and allows stabilizing many attractors, where the Ω / ||W|| ratio controls the sparsity of the activity. Then multistable dynamical systems are obtained in a large region of the parameter space, allowing to identify many different attractor patterns. The number of attractors is found to increase with the value of gamma (node excitability), at the expense of their intrinsic stability. Itinerant dynamics is obtained when a significant noise level is introduced in the system. Then, several "attractive" patterns can be reached on a single trajectory, where the duration of the visit reflects the stability of the pattern. The simple dynamical system we have implemented allows exploring a large region of the parameters space, but is also capable of reproducing some aspects of the brain's spontaneous activity (switching between different attractors). The set of attractors we find in some regions of the parameters space share similarities with the different functional modes observed in the resting-state activity [1].

[1]  Bennie ten Haken,et al.  How does spreading depression spread? Physiology and modeling , 2014, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[2]  G. Glover,et al.  Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Noise during Rest Enables the Exploration of the Brain's Dynamic Repertoire , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Boes,et al.  Statistical mechanics for networks of graded-response neurons. , 1991, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[6]  R. Buxton,et al.  A Model for the Coupling between Cerebral Blood Flow and Oxygen Metabolism during Neural Stimulation , 1997, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[7]  O. Sporns,et al.  Key role of coupling, delay, and noise in resting brain fluctuations , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[9]  Amanda V. Utevsky,et al.  Precuneus Is a Functional Core of the Default-Mode Network , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Sompolinsky,et al.  Spin-glass models of neural networks. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[12]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Sompolinsky,et al.  Information storage in neural networks with low levels of activity. , 1987, Physical review. A, General physics.

[15]  Marcus E. Raichle,et al.  The Restless Brain , 2011, Brain Connect..

[16]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Dynamic causal models of steady-state responses , 2009, NeuroImage.

[17]  S. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Solvable Model of a Spin-Glass , 1975 .

[18]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  The Virtual Brain: a simulator of primate brain network dynamics , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[19]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Neuroinformatics Original Research Article , 2022 .

[20]  Jianfeng Feng,et al.  Synchronization in networks with random interactions: theory and applications. , 2006, Chaos.

[21]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Bottom up modeling of the connectome: Linking structure and function in the resting brain and their changes in aging , 2013, NeuroImage.

[22]  G. Deco,et al.  Ongoing Cortical Activity at Rest: Criticality, Multistability, and Ghost Attractors , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Viktor K Jirsa,et al.  Reduced representations of heterogeneous mixed neural networks with synaptic coupling. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Resting brains never rest: computational insights into potential cognitive architectures , 2013, Trends in Neurosciences.

[26]  HighWire Press The journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. , 1981 .

[27]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Multistability in Large Scale Models of Brain Activity , 2013, BMC Neuroscience.

[28]  G. Deco,et al.  Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  Markus A. Dahlem,et al.  Dynamics from Seconds to Hours in Hodgkin-Huxley Model with Time-Dependent Ion Concentrations and Buffer Reservoirs , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[30]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Brain Dynamics of Aging: Multiscale Variability of EEG Signals at Rest and during an Auditory Oddball Task1,2,3 , 2015, eNeuro.

[32]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Dispersion and time delay effects in synchronized spike–burst networks , 2008, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[33]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Integrating neuroinformatics tools in TheVirtualBrain , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[34]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[35]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[36]  Wei Liao,et al.  Mapping the Voxel-Wise Effective Connectome in Resting State fMRI , 2013, PloS one.

[37]  D. Amit,et al.  Statistical mechanics of neural networks near saturation , 1987 .

[38]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  a K.E. Stephan, a R.B. Reilly, , 2007 .

[39]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Functional connectivity dynamics: Modeling the switching behavior of the resting state , 2015, NeuroImage.

[40]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  A Low Dimensional Description of Globally Coupled Heterogeneous Neural Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[41]  O Sporns,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear Responses in fMRI: The Balloon Model, Volterra Kernels, and Other Hemodynamics , 2000, NeuroImage.

[43]  J. Cowan,et al.  A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue , 1973, Kybernetik.

[44]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  How anatomy shapes dynamics: a semi-analytical study of the brain at rest by a simple spin model , 2012, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[45]  Fabrice Bartolomei,et al.  Electrical stimulation of a small brain area reversibly disrupts consciousness , 2014, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[46]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[48]  Habib Benali,et al.  Relating Structure and Function in the Human Brain: Relative Contributions of Anatomy, Stationary Dynamics, and Non-stationarities , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[49]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Consistent spectral predictors for dynamic causal models of steady-state responses , 2011, NeuroImage.

[50]  Christophe Bernard,et al.  Seizures, refractory status epilepticus, and depolarization block as endogenous brain activities. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[51]  R. Buxton,et al.  Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: The balloon model , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[52]  O. Sporns,et al.  Towards the virtual brain: network modeling of the intact and the damaged brain. , 2010, Archives italiennes de biologie.

[53]  M. Tsodyks,et al.  The Enhanced Storage Capacity in Neural Networks with Low Activity Level , 1988 .

[54]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  The Virtual Brain Integrates Computational Modeling and Multimodal Neuroimaging , 2013, Brain Connect..

[56]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Whole-brain anatomical networks: Does the choice of nodes matter? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[57]  Viktor K Jirsa,et al.  Neural Population Modes Capture Biologically Realistic Large Scale Network Dynamics , 2011, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[58]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Mathematical framework for large-scale brain network modeling in The Virtual Brain , 2015, NeuroImage.

[60]  R. Tsien,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2022 .

[61]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Systematic approximations of neural fields through networks of neural masses in the virtual brain , 2013, NeuroImage.

[62]  A R McIntosh,et al.  The development of a noisy brain. , 2010, Archives italiennes de biologie.

[63]  Cornelis J. Stam,et al.  Small-world and scale-free organization of voxel-based resting-state functional connectivity in the human brain , 2008, NeuroImage.

[64]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .