Performance Measurement of Italian Provinces in the Presence of Environmental Goals

The widespread of sustainable development concept intimates a vision of an ecologically balanced society, where it is necessary to preserve environmental resources and integrate economics and environment in decision-making. Consequently, there has been increasing recognition in developed nations of the importance of good environmental performance, in terms of reducing environmental disamenities, generated as outputs of the production processes, and increasing environmental benefits. In this context, the aim of the present work is to evaluate the environmental efficiency of Italian provinces by using the non-parametric approach to efficiency measurement, represented by Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique. To this purpose, we propose a two-step methodology allowing for improving the discriminatory power of DEA in the presence of heterogeneity of the sample. In the first phase, provinces are classified into groups of similar characteristics. Then, efficiency measures are computed for each cluster.

[1]  Eugenia Nissi,et al.  Monitoring environmental efficiency: An application to Italian provinces , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[3]  D. Aigner,et al.  P. Schmidt, 1977,?Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models,? , 1977 .

[4]  S. Thore,et al.  Ranking the Performance of Producers in the Presence of Environmental Goals Research paper , 2002 .

[5]  E. Thanassoulis A data envelopment analysis approach to clustering operating units for resource allocation purposes , 1996 .

[6]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  A response to comments on modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[8]  篠原 正明,et al.  William W.Cooper,Lawrence M.Seiford,Kaoru Tone 著, DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS : A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000年, 318頁 , 2002 .

[9]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[10]  Sten A. Thore,et al.  Technology Commercialization: DEA and Related Analytical Methods for Evaluating the Use and Implementation of Technical Innovation , 2002 .

[11]  Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson,et al.  Increasing the discriminatory power of DEA in the presence of the sample heterogeneity with cluster analysis and decision trees , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Measuring Eco‐efficiency of Production with Data Envelopment Analysis , 2005 .

[13]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[14]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Pitfalls and protocols in DEA , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Holger Scheel,et al.  Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Harald Dyckhoff,et al.  Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA) , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson,et al.  Determining sources of relative inefficiency in heterogeneous samples: Methodology using Cluster Analysis, DEA and Neural Networks , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..