Sensitivity analysis for nonignorable missingness and outcome misclassification from proxy reports.

Researchers often recruit proxy respondents, such as relatives or caregivers, for epidemiologic studies of older adults when study participants are unable to provide self-reports (eg, because of illness or cognitive impairment). In most studies involving proxy-reported outcomes, proxies are recruited only to report on behalf of participants who have missing self-reported outcomes; thus, either a proxy report or participant self-report, but not both, is available for each participant. When outcomes are binary and investigators conceptualize participant self-reports as gold standard measures, substituting proxy reports in place of missing participant self-reports in statistical analysis can introduce misclassification error and lead to biased parameter estimates. However, excluding observations from participants with missing self-reported outcomes may also lead to bias. We propose a pattern-mixture model that uses error-prone proxy reports to reduce selection bias from missing outcomes, and we describe a sensitivity analysis to address bias from differential outcome misclassification. We perform model estimation with high-dimensional (eg, continuous) covariates using propensity-score stratification and multiple imputation. We apply the methods to the Second Cohort of the Baltimore Hip Studies, a study of elderly hip fracture patients, to assess the relation between type of surgical treatment and perceived physical recovery. Simulation studies show that the proposed methods perform well. We provide SAS programs in the eAppendix (http://links.lww.com/EDE/A646) to enhance the methods' accessibility.

[1]  Andrea Rotnitzky,et al.  Pattern–mixture and selection models for analysing longitudinal data with monotone missing patterns , 2003 .

[2]  Ian R White,et al.  Are missing outcome data adequately handled? A review of published randomized controlled trials in major medical journals , 2004, Clinical trials.

[3]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Reliability of proxy respondents for patients with stroke: a systematic review. , 2010, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[4]  S. Studenski,et al.  Designing Randomized, Controlled Trials Aimed at Preventing or Delaying Functional Decline and Disability in Frail, Older Persons: A Consensus Report , 2004, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[5]  Hermann Brenner,et al.  Correcting for Exposure Misclassification Using an Alloyed Gold Standard , 1996, Epidemiology.

[6]  S. Tang,et al.  Use of Family Proxies in Quality of Life Research for Cancer Patients at the End of Life: A Literature Review , 2002, Cancer investigation.

[7]  D. Rubin,et al.  Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score , 1984 .

[8]  Michelle Shardell,et al.  Pattern‐mixture models for analyzing normal outcome data with proxy respondents , 2010, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  B A Barron,et al.  The effects of misclassification on the estimation of relative risk. , 1977, Biometrics.

[10]  I. Bross Misclassification in 2 X 2 Tables , 1954 .

[11]  D. Rubin INFERENCE AND MISSING DATA , 1975 .

[12]  M. Kenward,et al.  Using causal diagrams to guide analysis in missing data problems , 2012, Statistical methods in medical research.

[13]  Daniel Westreich,et al.  Berkson's bias, selection bias, and missing data. , 2012, Epidemiology.

[14]  S. Zimmerman,et al.  Proxy reporting in five areas of functional status. Comparison with self-reports and observations of performance. , 1997, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  D. Cox,et al.  Asymptotic techniques for use in statistics , 1989 .

[16]  Elizabeth A Stuart,et al.  Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning , 2010, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  Karon F Cook,et al.  Proxies and other external raters: methodological considerations. , 2005, Health services research.

[18]  Y. Matsuyama,et al.  Marginal Structural Models as a Tool for Standardization , 2003, Epidemiology.

[19]  L. Fried,et al.  Designing a community study of moderately to severely disabled older women: the Women's Health and Aging Study. , 1999, Annals of epidemiology.

[20]  Raymond J. Carroll,et al.  Measurement error in nonlinear models: a modern perspective , 2006 .

[21]  R. D'Agostino Adjustment Methods: Propensity Score Methods for Bias Reduction in the Comparison of a Treatment to a Non‐Randomized Control Group , 2005 .

[22]  M. Graffar [Modern epidemiology]. , 1971, Bruxelles medical.

[23]  Douglas K Miller,et al.  Recruitment and Retention of Older Adults in Aging Research , 2008, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[24]  S. Zimmerman,et al.  Recovery from hip fracture in eight areas of function. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[25]  Timothy L Lash,et al.  Semi-Automated Sensitivity Analysis to Assess Systematic Errors in Observational Data , 2003, Epidemiology.

[26]  Timothy L Lash,et al.  A method to automate probabilistic sensitivity analyses of misclassified binary variables. , 2005, International journal of epidemiology.

[27]  R. Little Pattern-Mixture Models for Multivariate Incomplete Data , 1993 .

[28]  M J Daniels,et al.  A Bayesian Shrinkage Model for Incomplete Longitudinal Binary Data With Application to the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial , 2010, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[29]  R. Little,et al.  Pattern-mixture models for multivariate incomplete data with covariates. , 1996, Biometrics.

[30]  Michelle Shardell,et al.  Comparing Reports From Hip-Fracture Patients and Their Proxies , 2012, Journal of aging and health.

[31]  Michelle Shardell,et al.  Sensitivity analysis using elicited expert information for inference with coarsened data: illustration of censored discrete event times in the AIDS Link to Intravenous Experience (ALIVE) Study. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[32]  Robert H Lyles,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for misclassification in logistic regression via likelihood methods and predictive value weighting , 2010, Statistics in medicine.

[33]  L. Magder,et al.  Logistic regression when the outcome is measured with uncertainty. , 1997, American journal of epidemiology.

[34]  J. Magaziner,et al.  Semiparametric regression models for repeated measures of mortal cohorts with non‐monotone missing outcomes and time‐dependent covariates , 2010, Statistics in medicine.

[35]  J. Neuhaus,et al.  Analysis of Clustered and Longitudinal Binary Data Subject to Response Misclassification , 2002, Biometrics.

[36]  S. Greenland,et al.  Correcting for misclassification in two-way tables and matched-pair studies. , 1983, International journal of epidemiology.

[37]  Michelle Shardell,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Informatively Coarsened Data Using Pattern Mixture Models , 2009, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[38]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[39]  Nicole A. Lazar,et al.  Statistical Analysis With Missing Data , 2003, Technometrics.

[40]  M Salive,et al.  Association of education with incidence of cognitive impairment in three established populations for epidemiologic studies of the elderly. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.