Choice Modeling and SEM

The paper shows how two dominant methodological approaches in quantitative marketing research of the last decades can be integrated. Combining the strengths of covariance structure analysis to control for measurement errors and the ability to predict choice behavior via the Multinomial Logit (MNL) model creates a powerful hybrid approach – the Integrated Choice and Latent variable (ICLV) model – for marketing research. We document the basic features of this approach and present an example which illustrates how the ICLV model can be used to explain travel mode choice. The hybrid modeling framework provides several advantages: (1) it gives a more realistic and comprehensive representation of the choice process taking place in the consumer’s “black box”; (2) it provides greater explanatory power; (3) it helps to remedy the biasing effect of neglecting important latent variables to explain choice behavior, thus allowing for a more accurate assessment of how marketing influences customers’ choice behavior.

[1]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[2]  John Thøgersen,et al.  Values and Attitude Formation Towards Emerging Attitude Objects: From Recycling to General, Waste Minimizing Behavior , 1997 .

[3]  Maria Johansson,et al.  The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice , 2006 .

[4]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models , 2003 .

[5]  Benedict G. C. Dellaert,et al.  Marketing Mass-Customized Products: Striking a Balance between Utility and Complexity , 2005 .

[6]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  What type of vehicle do people drive? The role of attitude and lifestyle in influencing vehicle type choice - eScholarship , 2004 .

[7]  Martin Lanzendorf,et al.  Mobility Styles and Travel Behavior: Application of a Lifestyle Approach to Leisure Travel , 2002 .

[8]  Anand V. Bodapati,et al.  A Hybrid Choice Model that Uses Actual and Ordered Attribute Value Information , 2005 .

[9]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Estimation of a Model with Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes of a Single Latent Variable , 1975 .

[10]  Kenneth Train,et al.  A validation test of a disaggregate mode choice model , 1978 .

[11]  Till Dannewald,et al.  Integrating latent variables in discrete choice models – How higher-order values and attitudes determine consumer choice , 2007 .

[12]  Steffen Kühnel,et al.  Überzeugungssysteme in einem zweistufigen Modell rationaler Handlungen , 1998 .

[13]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Hybrid Choice Models with Logit Kernel: Applicability to Large Scale Models1 , 2005 .

[14]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Extended Framework for Modeling Choice Behavior , 1999 .

[15]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[16]  D. McFadden The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research , 1986 .

[17]  Gary J. Russell,et al.  A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure , 1989 .

[18]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Hybrid Choice Models: Progress and Challenges , 2002 .

[19]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Extending the Cross-Cultural Validity of the Theory of Basic Human Values with a Different Method of Measurement , 2001 .

[20]  L. J. Shrum,et al.  The recycling of solid wastes: Personal values, value orientations, and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of recycling behavior , 1994 .

[21]  Denis Bolduc,et al.  On estimation of Hybrid Choice Models , 2009 .

[22]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[23]  Philip Hans Franses,et al.  Econometric Models in Marketing , 2002 .

[24]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  Investigating Heterogeneity in Brand Preferences in Logit Models for Panel Data , 1991 .

[25]  Wagner A. Kamakura,et al.  Issues in the estimation and application of latent structure models of choice , 1994 .

[26]  Till Dannewald,et al.  Incorporating Latent Variables into Discrete Choice Models — A Simultaneous Estimation Approach Using SEM Software , 2008 .

[27]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete choice models incorporating revealed preferences and psychometric data , 2002 .

[28]  Kalidas Ashok,et al.  Extending Discrete Choice Models to Incorporate Attitudinal and Other Latent Variables , 2002 .

[29]  Tobias Heldt,et al.  Latent Variables in a Travel Mode Choice Model: Attitudinal and Behavioural Indicator Variables , 2005 .

[30]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Generalized random utility model , 2002, Math. Soc. Sci..

[31]  John D. C. Little,et al.  A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[32]  Joan L. Walker Extended discrete choice models : integrated framework, flexible error structures, and latent variables , 2001 .