Quantitative Estimation and Validation of the Effects of the Convergence, Bisector Elevation, and Asymmetry Angles on the Positioning Accuracies of Satellite Stereo Pairs

Abstract The convergence, bisector elevation ( bie ), and asymmetry angles are three angles that describe the geometric conditions in stereo imaging. In this study, the effects of the angles on the positioning accuracies of stereo pairs were investigated. First, through careful observation of the stereo geometry that determines the ray-intersection in object space, the effects of the angles were visualized and quantified. Second, formulas to estimate the positioning errors, including these quantified effects, were proposed. Third, the formulas were validated using real satellite data. Our experiment results confirmed the accuracy variations due to the angles, both visually and quantitatively, and that all angles may significantly affect both the horizontal and vertical accuracies, particularly for dual-satellite stereo with weak geometry. The primary contributions of this paper are the provision of theoretical background of the effects of the angles and experimental confirmations of the quantitative effects of them on the stereo positioning accuracies.

[1]  Sooahm Rhee,et al.  Investigation of physical sensor models for modelling SPOT 3 orbits , 2007 .

[2]  H. J. Theiss,et al.  TEMPORAL CORRELATION OF METADATA ERRORS FOR COMMERCIAL SATELLITE IMAGES: REPRESENTATION AND EFFECTS ON STEREO EXTRACTION ACCURACY , 2012 .

[3]  Frank W. Gerlach,et al.  IKONOS satellite, imagery, and products , 2003 .

[4]  Liang-Chien Chen,et al.  The Geometrical Comparisons of RSM and RFM for FORMOSAT-2 Satellite Images , 2006 .

[5]  T. Teo Bias Compensation in a Rigorous Sensor Model and Rational Function Model for High-Resolution Satellite Images , 2011 .

[6]  Maoteng Zheng,et al.  Combined Bundle Block Adjustment with Spaceborne Linear Array and Airborne Frame Array Imagery , 2013 .

[7]  Manuel A. Aguilar,et al.  Geopositioning Accuracy Assessment of GeoEye-1 Panchromatic and Multispectral Imagery , 2012 .

[8]  Ian Dowman,et al.  Comparison of two physical sensor models for satellite images: Position–Rotation model and Orbit–Attitude model , 2006 .

[9]  Taejung Kim,et al.  Analysis of Dual-Sensor Stereo Geometry and Its Positioning Accuracy , 2014 .

[10]  Clive S. Fraser,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Geopositioning Accuracy of Ikonos Imagery , 2002 .

[11]  Clive S. Fraser,et al.  Georeferencing Accuracy of GeoEye-1 imagery , 2009 .

[12]  Kaichang Di,et al.  Integration of Ikonos and QuickBird Imagery for Geopositioning Accuracy Analysis , 2007 .

[13]  Yongjun Zhang,et al.  A New Approach on Optimization of the Rational Function Model of High-Resolution Satellite Imagery , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Manuel A. Aguilar,et al.  Assessing geometric accuracy of the orthorectification process from GeoEye-1 and WorldView-2 panchromatic images , 2013, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[15]  J. Grodecki,et al.  Block Adjustment of High-Resolution Satellite Images Described by Rational Polynomials , 2003 .

[16]  John Dolloff,et al.  An Assessment of WorldView-1 Positional Accuracy based on Fifty Contiguous Stereo Pairs of Imagery , 2010 .

[17]  Rongxing Li,et al.  Impact of imaging geometry on 3D geopositioning accuracy of stereo IKONOS imagery , 2009 .

[18]  X. Tong,et al.  Bias-corrected rational polynomial coefficients for high accuracy geo-positioning of QuickBird stereo imagery , 2010 .

[19]  Kaichang Di,et al.  Geometric Integration of Aerial and High-Resolution Satellite Imagery and Application in Shoreline Mapping , 2008 .

[20]  I.,et al.  Topographic Mapping from SPOT Imagery , 2008 .