Anthropometric criteria for the design of tractor cabs and protection frames

Improved human – tractor interface designs, such as well-accommodated operator enclosures (i.e. cabs and protection frames) can enhance operator productivity, comfort and safety. This study investigated farm-worker anthropometry and determined the critical anthropometric measures and 3-D feature envelopes of body landmarks for the design of tractor operator enclosures. One hundred agriculture workers participated in the study. Their body size and shape information was registered, using a 3-D full-body laser scanner. Knee height (sitting) and another eight parameters were found to affect the cab-enclosure accommodation rating and multiple anthropometric dimensions interactively affected the steering wheel and gear-handle impediment. A principal component analysis has identified 15 representative human body models for digitally assessing tractor-cab accommodation. A set of centroid coordinates of 34 body landmarks and the 95% confidence semi-axis-length for each landmark location were developed to guide tractor designers in their placement of tractor control components in order to best accommodate the user population. Finally, the vertical clearance (90 cm) for agriculture tractor enclosure in the current SAE International J2194 standard appeared to be too short as compared to the 99th percentile sitting height of male farm workers in this study (100.6 cm) and in the 1994 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III database (99.9 cm) and of the male civilian population in the 2002 Civilian American and European Surface Anthropometric Resource database (100.4 cm).

[1]  Harald Ason Moberg.  Dynamic Testing of Tractor Protection Cabs - Development of Method, Practical Experiences , 1973 .

[2]  Ralph A. Palmer.  American society of agricultural engineers , 1925, Journal of the A.I.E.E..

[3]  Steven M. Casey,et al.  The Acceptability of Control Locations and Related Features in Agricultural Tractor Cabs , 1990 .

[4]  Brian D. Corner,et al.  Effect of sway on image fidelity in whole-body digitizing , 1998, Electronic Imaging.

[5]  Ajay Verma,et al.  Anthropometric survey of Indian farm workers to approach ergonomics in agricultural machinery design. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  D Z Loesch,et al.  Principal component analysis of shape variables in adult individuals. , 1989, Annals of human biology.

[7]  L P Gite,et al.  Anthropometric survey for agricultural machinery design: an Indian case study. , 1989, Applied ergonomics.

[8]  R Patel,et al.  Development of an ergonomic evaluation facility for Indian tractors. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  Kathleen M. Robinette.  Caesar Measures Up , 2000 .

[10]  Jeffrey A. Hudson,et al.  A Multivariate Anthropometric Method for Crew Station Design: Abridged , 1993 .

[11]  Bruce Bradtmiller,et al.  Sizing and fit of fall-protection harnesses , 2003, Ergonomics.

[12]  Claire C. Gordon,et al.  2012 Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel: Methods and Summary Statistics , 2014 .

[13]  H.A.M. Daanen,et al.  Earthquake in Anthropometry : The view from the Epicenter , 1998 .

[14]  Daniel Long,et al.  Anthropometric differences among occupational groups , 2002, Ergonomics.

[15]  Rajvir Yadav,et al.  Tractor operator workplace design-a review , 1998 .

[16]  S. Keith Adams,et al.  Human Factors in Agricultural Tractor Safety , 1975 .

[17]  D J Bottoms.  Design guidelines for operator entry-exit systems on mobile equipment. , 1983, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  U. Grenander,et al.  Hippocampal morphometry in schizophrenia by high dimensional brain mapping. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Combining point distribution models with shape models based on finite element analysis , 1994, Image Vis. Comput..

[20]  Kathleen M. Robinette,et al.  Reducing movement artifacts in whole body scanning , 1997, Proceedings. International Conference on Recent Advances in 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (Cat. No.97TB100134).

[21]  John B. Liljedahl,et al.  Tractors and Their Power Units , 1952, Soil Science Society of America Journal.

[22]  M S Kaminaka.  Research needs in the American agricultural equipment industry. Results of a survey and some personal observations. , 1985, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  K M Robinette,et al.  Size and shape analysis techniques for design. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  John T. McConville,et al.  Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel: Methods and Summary Statistics 1988 , 1989 .

[25]  Charles E. Heckler,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 2005, Technometrics.

[26]  Dennis B. Burnsides,et al.  Integrate 1.25: A Prototype for Evaluating Three-Dimensional Visualization, Analysis, and Manipulation Functionality , 1996 .