Vertical overlap of probability density functions of cloud and precipitation hydrometeors

Coarse‐resolution climate models increasingly rely on probability density functions (PDFs) to represent subgrid‐scale variability of prognostic variables. While PDFs characterize the horizontal variability, a separate treatment is needed to account for the vertical structure of clouds and precipitation. When subcolumns are drawn from these PDFs for microphysics or radiation parameterizations, appropriate vertical correlations must be enforced via PDF overlap specifications. This study evaluates the representation of PDF overlap in the Subgrid Importance Latin Hypercube Sampler (SILHS) employed in the assumed PDF turbulence and cloud scheme called the Cloud Layers Unified by Binormals (CLUBB). PDF overlap in CLUBB‐SILHS simulations of continental and tropical oceanic deep convection is compared with overlap of PDF of various microphysics variables in cloud‐resolving model (CRM) simulations of the same cases that explicitly predict the 3‐D structure of cloud and precipitation fields. CRM results show that PDF overlap varies significantly between different hydrometeor types, as well as between PDFs of mass and number mixing ratios for each species—a distinction that the current SILHS implementation does not make. In CRM simulations that explicitly resolve cloud and precipitation structures, faster falling species, such as rain and graupel, exhibit significantly higher coherence in their vertical distributions than slow falling cloud liquid and ice. These results suggest that to improve the overlap treatment in the subcolumn generator, the PDF correlations need to depend on hydrometeor properties, such as fall speeds, in addition to the currently implemented dependency on the turbulent convective length scale.

[1]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  A unified parameterization of clouds and turbulence using CLUBB and subcolumns in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2015 .

[2]  R. Neggers,et al.  Overlap statistics of shallow boundary layer clouds: Comparing ground‐based observations with large‐eddy simulations , 2015 .

[3]  Minghuai Wang,et al.  Evaluation of Subgrid-Scale Hydrometeor Transport Schemes Using a High-Resolution Cloud-Resolving Model , 2015 .

[4]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  Advanced Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics for Global Models. Part II: Global Model Solutions and Aerosol–Cloud Interactions* , 2015 .

[5]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  Parameterizing deep convection using the assumed probability density function method , 2014 .

[6]  Ann M. Fridlind,et al.  Intercomparison of large‐eddy simulations of Arctic mixed‐phase clouds: Importance of ice size distribution assumptions , 2014 .

[7]  D. P. Schanen,et al.  Higher-Order Turbulence Closure and Its Impact on Climate Simulations in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2013 .

[8]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  The Subgrid Importance Latin Hypercube Sampler (SILHS): a multivariate subcolumn generator , 2013 .

[9]  V. Larson,et al.  A single‐column model ensemble approach applied to the TWP‐ICE experiment , 2013 .

[10]  Ann M. Fridlind,et al.  Analysis of cloud‐resolving simulations of a tropical mesoscale convective system observed during TWP‐ICE: Vertical fluxes and draft properties in convective and stratiform regions , 2012 .

[11]  Xiaoqing Wu,et al.  A Comparison of TWP-ICE Observational Data with Cloud-Resolving Model Results , 2012 .

[12]  G. Bryan,et al.  Sensitivity of a Simulated Squall Line to Horizontal Resolution and Parameterization of Microphysics , 2012 .

[13]  A. Pier Siebesma,et al.  Overlap statistics of cumuliform boundary-layer cloud fields in large-eddy simulations , 2011 .

[14]  A. Korolev,et al.  Effects of ice number concentration on dynamics of a shallow mixed‐phase stratiform cloud , 2011 .

[15]  G. Thompson,et al.  Impact of Cloud Microphysics on the Development of Trailing Stratiform Precipitation in a Simulated Squall Line: Comparison of One- and Two-Moment Schemes , 2009 .

[16]  S. Ghan,et al.  A New Two-Moment Bulk Stratiform Cloud Microphysics Scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, Version 3 (CAM3). Part II: Single-Column and Global Results , 2008 .

[17]  Robin J. Hogan,et al.  Tripleclouds: An Efficient Method for Representing Horizontal Cloud Inhomogeneity in 1D Radiation Schemes by Using Three Regions at Each Height , 2008 .

[18]  Howard W. Barker,et al.  Overlap of fractional cloud for radiation calculations in GCMs: A global analysis using CloudSat and CALIPSO data , 2008 .

[19]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  From cloud overlap to PDF overlap , 2007 .

[20]  A. Tompkins,et al.  Generalizing Cloud Overlap Treatment to Include Solar Zenith Angle Effects on Cloud Geometry , 2007 .

[21]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  Supplying Local Microphysics Parameterizations with Information about Subgrid Variability: Latin Hypercube Sampling , 2005 .

[22]  Robert Pincus,et al.  Overlap assumptions for assumed probability distribution function cloud schemes in large‐scale models , 2005 .

[23]  R. Hogan,et al.  Parameterizing the Difference in Cloud Fraction Defined by Area and by Volume as Observed with Radar and Lidar , 2005 .

[24]  J. Curry,et al.  A New Double-Moment Microphysics Parameterization for Application in Cloud and Climate Models. Part I: Description , 2005 .

[25]  V. Larson,et al.  Using Probability Density Functions to Derive Consistent Closure Relationships among Higher-Order Moments , 2005 .

[26]  D. Randall,et al.  Stochastic generation of subgrid‐scale cloudy columns for large‐scale models , 2004 .

[27]  Alexei Korolev,et al.  Supersaturation of Water Vapor in Clouds , 2003 .

[28]  R. Hogan,et al.  Parameterizing Ice Cloud Inhomogeneity and the Overlap of Inhomogeneities Using Cloud Radar Data , 2003 .

[29]  D. Randall,et al.  Cloud resolving modeling of the ARM summer 1997 IOP: Model formulation, results, uncertainties, and sensitivities , 2003 .

[30]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  A PDF-Based Model for Boundary Layer Clouds. Part I: Method and Model Description , 2002 .

[31]  A New Class of Band Copulas - Distributions with Uniform Marginals , 2002 .

[32]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  Parameterizing Vertically Coherent Cloud Distributions , 2002 .

[33]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  An intercomparison of cloud‐resolving models with the atmospheric radiation measurement summer 1997 intensive observation period data , 2002 .

[34]  William D. Collins,et al.  Parameterization of Generalized Cloud Overlap for Radiative Calculations in General Circulation Models , 2001 .

[35]  S. Klein,et al.  Unresolved spatial variability and microphysical process rates in large‐scale models , 2000 .

[36]  Robin J. Hogan,et al.  Deriving cloud overlap statistics from radar , 2000 .

[37]  David A. Randall,et al.  Single-Column Models and Cloud Ensemble Models as Links between Observations and Climate Models , 1996 .

[38]  Anthony D. Del Genio,et al.  A Prognostic Cloud Water Parameterization for Global Climate Models , 1996 .

[39]  T. Ferguson.  A class of symmetric bivariate uniform distributions , 1995 .

[40]  Robert M. Rauber,et al.  An Explanation for the Existence of Supercooled Water at the Top of Cold Clouds , 1991 .

[41]  W. Grabowski,et al.  The multidimensional positive definite advection transport algorithm: nonoscillatory option , 1990 .

[42]  R M Cooke,et al.  Monte Carlo sampling for generalized knowledge dependence with application to human reliability. , 1986, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[43]  R. F. Strickler,et al.  Thermal Equilibrium of the Atmosphere with a Convective Adjustment , 1964 .