Taking Real-Life Seriously: An Approach to Decomposing Context Beyond “Environment” in Living Labs

The maturity of Living Labs has grown and several researchers have tried to create a uniform definition of what Living Labs are by emphasizing the multi-method and real-life, contextual approach. Although researchers thus recognize the importance of context in Living Labs, they do not provide insights into how context can be taken into account. The real-life context predominantly focuses on the in-situ use of a product during field trials where users are observed in their everyday life. The contribution of this paper will be twofold. By means of a case study we will show how context can be evaluated in the front end of design, so Living Lab researchers are no longer dependent on the readiness level of a product, and we will show how field trials can be evaluated in a more structured way to cover all components of context. By using a framework to evaluate the impact of context on product use, Living Lab researchers can improve the overall effectiveness of data gathering and analysis methods in a Living Lab project.

[1]  Jane Fulton Suri,et al.  Experience prototyping , 2000, DIS '00.

[2]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[3]  Giuseppe Mantovani,et al.  Social Context in HCI: A New Framework for Mental Models, Cooperation, and Communication , 1996, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Convivial Toolbox: Generative Research for the Front End of Design , 2013 .

[5]  Jesper Kjeldskov,et al.  Is It Worth the Hassle? Exploring the Added Value of Evaluating the Usability of Context-Aware Mobile Systems in the Field , 2004, Mobile HCI.

[6]  Dimitri Schuurman,et al.  Living Labs: Concepts, Tools and Cases , 2015 .

[7]  Robin Williams,et al.  The Wrong Trousers? Beyond the Design Fallacy: Social Learning and the User , 2005 .

[8]  M. Westerlund,et al.  Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes : Towards a Conceptual Framework , 2013 .

[9]  Pieter Ballon,et al.  Editorial Introduction Living Labs: Concepts, Tools and Cases , 2015 .

[10]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[11]  K. Malterud.  Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines , 2001, The Lancet.

[12]  Glenn A. Bowen.  Grounded Theory and Sensitizing Concepts , 2006 .

[13]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[14]  Lieven De Marez.  Diffusie van ICT-innovaties: accurater gebruikersinzicht voor betere introductiestrategieën , 2006 .

[15]  Dimitri Schuurman,et al.  Bringing Personas To Life: User Experience Design through Interactive Coupled Open Innovation , 2016 .

[16]  Satu Jumisko-Pyykkö,et al.  Framing the Context of Use for Mobile HCI , 2010, Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  Telematica Instituut,et al.  THE LIVING LABS HARMONIZATION CUBE: COMMUNICATING LIVING LABS' ESSENTIALS , 2008 .

[18]  C. Dell’Era,et al.  Living Lab: A Methodology between User‐Centred Design and Participatory Design , 2014 .

[19]  Anu Kankainen,et al.  Usability testing of mobile applications: a comparison between laboratory and field testing , 2005 .

[20]  Paul Dourish,et al.  What we talk about when we talk about context , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[21]  Virpi Roto,et al.  Best practices for capturing context in user experience studies in the wild , 2011, MindTrek.

[22]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Contextmapping: experiences from practice , 2005 .

[23]  Jesper Kjeldskov,et al.  Was it worth the hassle?: ten years of mobile HCI research discussions on lab and field evaluations , 2014, MobileHCI '14.

[24]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[25]  Asbjørn Følstad,et al.  Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review , 2008 .

[26]  Luc Martens,et al.  Linking an integrated framework with appropriate methods for measuring QoE , 2010, 2010 Second International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[27]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Co-creating in practice: Results and challenges , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE).