Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Mike Thelwall,et al. Why do papers have many Mendeley readers but few Scopus-indexed citations and vice versa? , 2017, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..
[2] Mike Thelwall,et al. Mendeley readership counts: An investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[3] Mike Thelwall,et al. Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fields , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[4] Mike Thelwall,et al. Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivations , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[5] Mike Thelwall,et al. Can Amazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books? , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[6] Mike Thelwall,et al. When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[7] Vincent Larivière,et al. Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[8] Mike Thelwall,et al. The metric tide: report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management , 2015 .
[9] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Which people use which scientific papers? An evaluation of data from F1000 and Mendeley , 2015, J. Informetrics.
[10] Rodrigo Costas,et al. Do Mendeley Readership Counts Help to Filter Highly Cited WoS Publications better than Average Citation Impact of Journals (JCS)? , 2015, ISSI.
[11] Mike Thelwall,et al. The influence of time and discipline on the magnitude of correlations between citation counts and quality scores , 2015, J. Informetrics.
[12] Mike Thelwall,et al. Are scholarly articles disproportionately read in their own country? An analysis of mendeley readers , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[13] Mike Thelwall,et al. ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring Scholarship? , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[14] S. Haustein,et al. Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns , 2015, PloS one.
[15] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Who Publishes, Reads, and Cites Papers? An Analysis of Country Information , 2015, ISSI.
[16] Daqing He,et al. User participation in an academic social networking service: A survey of open group users on Mendeley , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[17] Rodrigo Costas,et al. Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[18] Ehsan Mohammadi,et al. Identifying the invisible impact of scholarly publications : a multi-disciplinary analysis using 'altmetrics' , 2015 .
[19] Stefanie Haustein,et al. Exploring data quality and retrieval strategies for mendeley reader counts , 2015 .
[20] Sibele Fausto,et al. Does the Global South Have Altmetrics? Analyzing a Brazilian LIS Journal , 2015, ISSI.
[21] Vincent Larivière,et al. Is There a Gender Gap in Social Media Metrics? , 2015, ISSI.
[22] Ali Ghazinejad,et al. Who Tweets about Science? , 2015, ISSI.
[23] Liz Allen,et al. Alternative Perspectives on Impact: The Potential of ALMs and Altmetrics to Inform Funders about Research Impact , 2014, PLoS biology.
[24] Björn Hammarfelt,et al. Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities , 2014, Scientometrics.
[25] Vincent Larivière,et al. Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ? , 2014, it Inf. Technol..
[26] Mike Thelwall,et al. Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web? , 2014, Scientometrics.
[27] Christian Pieter Hoffmann,et al. Altmetrics for large, multidisciplinary research groups : Comparison of current tools , 2014 .
[28] Richard Furuta,et al. Do altmetrics follow the crowd or does the crowd follow altmetrics? , 2014, IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries.
[29] Vincent Larivière,et al. Astrophysicists on Twitter: An in-depth analysis of tweeting and scientific publication behavior , 2014, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..
[30] Mike Thelwall,et al. Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[31] Nicolás Robinson-García,et al. New data, new possibilities: Exploring the insides of Altmetric.com , 2014, ArXiv.
[32] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics , 2014, J. Informetrics.
[33] C Matthew Hawkins,et al. Social media in radiology: early trends in Twitter microblogging at radiology's largest international meeting. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.
[34] Mike Thelwall,et al. Academia.edu: Social network or Academic Network? , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[35] Christoph Trattner,et al. Twitter in academic conferences: usage, networking and participation over time , 2014, HT.
[36] Ludo Waltman,et al. F1000 Recommendations as a Potential New Data Source for Research Evaluation: A Comparison With Citations , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[37] Rodrigo Costas,et al. How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications , 2014, Scientometrics.
[38] Vincent Larivière,et al. Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[39] Beata Stachowiak,et al. The Presence of Polish Academics on Social Networking Websites for Academics, Using the Example of Employees of Nicolaus Copernicus University , 2014 .
[40] Judit Bar-Ilan,et al. Astrophysics publications on arXiv, Scopus and Mendeley: a case study , 2013, Scientometrics.
[41] Mike Thelwall,et al. Evaluating altmetrics , 2013, Scientometrics.
[42] Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,et al. The need for post-publication peer review in plant science publishing , 2013, Front. Plant Sci..
[43] Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,et al. The need for post-publication peer review in plant science publishing , 2013, Front. Plant Sci..
[44] Mike Thelwall,et al. Assessing non-standard article impact using F1000 labels , 2013, Scientometrics.
[45] M. Fenner. What Can Article-Level Metrics Do for You? , 2013, PLoS biology.
[46] Adam Eyre-Walker,et al. The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations , 2013, PLoS biology.
[47] Stacy Konkiel,et al. Tracking citations and altmetrics for research data: Challenges and opportunities , 2013 .
[48] Rousseau Ronald,et al. A multi-metric approach for research evaluation , 2013 .
[49] Arbana Kadriu,et al. Discovering value in academic social networks: A case study in ResearchGate , 2013, Proceedings of the ITI 2013 35th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces.
[50] Mike D Cadogan,et al. The impact of social media on a major international emergency medicine conference , 2013, Emergency Medicine Journal.
[51] Euan A. Adie,et al. Altmetric: enriching scholarly content with article‐level discussion and metrics , 2013, Learn. Publ..
[52] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000 , 2012, J. Informetrics.
[53] Mike Thelwall,et al. Tweeting Links to Academic Articles , 2013 .
[54] Jens Peter Andersen,et al. Altmetrics: An Alternate Perspective on Research Evaluation , 2013 .
[55] Amanda J Lee,et al. Increased Use of Twitter at a Medical Conference: A Report and a Review of the Educational Opportunities , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.
[56] Jane Hunter,et al. Post-Publication Peer Review: Opening Up Scientific Conversation , 2012, Front. Comput. Neurosci..
[57] Xianwen Wang,et al. Tracing scientist’s research trends realtimely , 2012, Scientometrics.
[58] D. Crotty. Life after publication: Post-publication peer review , 2012 .
[59] Mark Kats,et al. Tweeting the Meeting: An In-Depth Analysis of Twitter Activity at Kidney Week 2011 , 2012, PloS one.
[60] Jenny Fry,et al. Measuring researchers’ use of scholarly information through social bookmarking data: A case study of BibSonomy , 2012, J. Inf. Sci..
[61] Judit Bar-Ilan,et al. Beyond citations: Scholars' visibility on the social Web , 2012, ArXiv.
[62] Bradley M. Hemminger,et al. Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact , 2012, ArXiv.
[63] Nirmali Chakraborty,et al. Activities and Reasons for Using Social Networking Sites by Research Scholars in NEHU: A Study on Facebook and ResearchGate , 2012 .
[64] Rodrigo Costas,et al. Users, narcissism and control – tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century , 2012 .
[65] Johan Bollen,et al. How the Scientific Community Reacts to Newly Submitted Preprints: Article Downloads, Twitter Mentions, and Citations , 2012, PloS one.
[66] M. Thelwall,et al. F 1000 , Mendeley and Traditional Bibliometric Indicators , 2012 .
[67] Mike Thelwall,et al. Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement , 2011, Scientometrics.
[68] Gunther Eysenbach,et al. Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.
[69] Tobias Siebenlist,et al. Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage , 2011, J. Informetrics.
[70] Melissa Terras,et al. Enabled backchannel: conference Twitter use by digital humanists , 2011, J. Documentation.
[71] Massimo Franceschet,et al. The first Italian research assessment exercise: A bibliometric perspective , 2009, J. Informetrics.
[72] Katrin Weller,et al. Citation Analysis in Twitter: Approaches for Defining and Measuring Information Flows within Tweets during Scientific Conferences , 2011, #MSM.
[73] R. Steen. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? , 2010, Journal of Medical Ethics.
[74] Jason Priem,et al. How and why scholars cite on Twitter , 2010, ASIST.
[75] Bradley M. Hemminger,et al. Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web , 2010, First Monday.
[76] D. Wardle. Do 'Faculty of 1000' (F1000) ratings of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact? , 2010 .
[77] John G. Breslin,et al. Using Twitter During an Academic Conference: The #iswc2009 Use-Case , 2010, ICWSM.
[78] Chih-Ping Wei,et al. Understanding what concerns consumers: a semantic approach to product feature extraction from consumer reviews , 2010, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..
[79] John G. Breslin,et al. Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages , 2010 .
[80] C. Neylon,et al. Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact , 2009, PLoS biology.
[81] Victor Henning,et al. Mendeley - A Last.fm For Research? , 2008, 2008 IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience.
[82] Antal van den Bosch,et al. Recommending scientific articles using citeulike , 2008, RecSys '08.
[83] Steve Pettifer,et al. Defrosting the Digital Library: Bibliographic Tools for the Next Generation Web , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[84] Dario Taraborelli,et al. Soft peer review. Social software and distributed scientific evaluation , 2008, COOP.
[85] L. Butler,et al. Testing novel quantitative indicators of research ‘quality’, esteem and ‘user engagement’: an economics pilot study , 2007 .
[86] Jon Ritterbush,et al. Supporting Library Research with LibX and Zotero , 2007 .
[87] Johan Bollen,et al. Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..
[88] Stephen S. Murray,et al. The bibliometric properties of article readership information , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[89] Charles Oppenheim,et al. The Influence of Peer Review on the Research Assessment Exercise , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..
[90] Stéfan Jacques Darmoni,et al. Reading factor as a credible alternative to impact factor: a preliminary study , 2000 .
[91] Michael J. Kurtz,et al. The NASA Astrophysics Data System: Overview , 2000, astro-ph/0002104.
[92] B. Cronin,et al. The praxis of acknowledgement: from bibliometrics to influmetrics , 1995 .