Balancing Audience and Privacy Tensions on Social Network Sites: Strategies of Highly Engaged Users

As social network sites grow and diversify in both users and content, tensions between users’ audience composition and their disclosure practices become more prevalent. Users must navigate these spaces carefully to reap relational benefits while ensuring content is not shared with unintended audiences. Through a qualitative study of highly engaged Facebook users, this study provides insight into how people conceptualize friendship online as well as how perceived audience affects privacy concerns and privacy management strategies. Findings suggest an increasingly complex relationship between these variables, fueled by collapsing contexts and invisible audiences. Although a diverse range of strategies are available to manage privacy, most participants in this sample still engaged in some degree of self-censorship.

[1]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[2]  M. Engle.  Book Review: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd Ed.) , 1999 .

[3]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook , 2006, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[4]  Robert G. Capra,et al.  Factors mediating disclosure in social network sites , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  The post that wasn't: exploring self-censorship on facebook , 2013, CSCW.

[6]  Aaron C. T. Smith.  Older adults and technology use , 2014 .

[7]  J. Walther.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[8]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Misplaced Confidences , 2013, WEIS.

[9]  Adam D. I. Kramer,et al.  Self-Censorship on Facebook , 2013, ICWSM.

[10]  E. Litt.  Knock, Knock. Who's There? The Imagined Audience , 2012 .

[11]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Silent Listeners: The Evolution of Privacy and Disclosure on Facebook , 2013, J. Priv. Confidentiality.

[12]  Airi Lampinen,et al.  We're in it together: interpersonal management of disclosure in social network services , 2011, CHI.

[13]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[14]  Frederic Stutzman,et al.  Boundary regulation in social media , 2012, CSCW.

[15]  B. Hogan.  The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online , 2010 .

[16]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks , 2013, CHI.

[17]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[18]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Using facebook after losing a job: differential benefits of strong and weak ties , 2013, CSCW.

[19]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Social capital on facebook: differentiating uses and users , 2011, CHI.

[20]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  Information revelation and internet privacy concerns on social network sites: a case study of facebook , 2009, C&T.

[21]  L. Webb,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication in Personal Relationships , 2010 .

[22]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  A bumpy ride on the information superhighway: Exploring turbulence online , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  유창조.  Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[24]  Kelly G. Shaver,et al.  THE ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR , 2015 .

[25]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices , 2011, New Media Soc..

[26]  Eden Litt,et al.  Understanding social network site users' privacy tool use , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  Don't Disturb My Circles! Boundary Preservation Is at the Center of Location-Sharing Concerns , 2012, ICWSM.

[28]  D. Boyd.  Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics , 2010 .

[29]  Ben L. Marder,et al.  Every Post You Make, Every Pic You Take, I'll Be Watching You: Behind Social Spheres on Facebook , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[30]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  ‘There’s a network out there you might as well tap’: Exploring the benefits of and barriers to exchanging informational and support-based resources on Facebook , 2013, New Media Soc..

[31]  Danah Boyd,et al.  I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience , 2011, New Media Soc..

[32]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[33]  Jessica Vitak,et al.  Norm evolution and violation on Facebook , 2012, New Media Soc..

[34]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Talking in circles: selective sharing in google+ , 2012, CHI.

[35]  S. Duck.  Meaningful relationships : talking, sense, and relating , 1994 .

[36]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[37]  Bernhard Debatin,et al.  Facebook and Online Privacy: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Unintended Consequences , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[38]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network , 2007, CHI.

[39]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Social networks and Internet connectivity effects , 2005 .

[40]  Jorge Peña,et al.  Intentions to hide and unfriend Facebook connections based on perceptions of sender attractiveness and status updates , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Privacy in Context - Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life , 2009 .

[42]  Lois Ann Scheidt,et al.  It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens , 2015, New Media Soc..

[43]  S. Petronio.  Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure , 2002 .

[44]  Jessica Vitak.  The Impact of Context Collapse and Privacy on Social Network Site Disclosures , 2012 .

[45]  Zizi Papacharissi.  Without You, I'm Nothing: Performances of the Self on Twitter , 2012 .

[46]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[47]  Robin Dunbar,et al.  How many "friends" can you really have? , 2011, IEEE Spectrum.