A survey on the impact of economies of scale on scientific communities

Cloud computing is commonly characterized as a sort of computing that depends on offering computing resources instead of having neighborhood servers or individual gadgets to handle applications. The resource suppliers give adaptable resources to the client. In this paper, we propose to discover it out whether the little or medium scale scientific communities can utilize the economies of scale as a part of the cloud for its advantages. In this paper, we propose a Public Cloud model for leasing the adaptable resources from any open cloud supplier to the little or medium scale research associations. On the premise of this Public Cloud model, we are actualizing a novel strategy to handle the heterogeneous scientific workload on the cloud. The two average workloads are contemplated in this paper: High Throughput Computing (HTC) and Many Task Computing (MTC). Our workload taking care of the system can spare the aggregate resource utilization in both these workloads viably. We are proposing a novel scheduling technique, “Earlier Account Expire Prioritized with Round Robin (EAEP-RR) scheduling”, to handle the requests at cloud. At last, we can presume that our routines can advantage the scientific communities from the economies of scale in the cloud environment.

[1]  Borja Sotomayor,et al.  Capacity Leasing in Cloud Systems using the OpenNebula Engine , 2008 .

[2]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  Above the Clouds: A Berkeley View of Cloud Computing , 2009 .

[3]  Li Yang,et al.  A New Class of Priority-based Weighted Fair Scheduling Algorithm , 2012 .

[4]  T. Ravichandran,et al.  Non-Preemptive Real Time Scheduling using Checkpointing Algorithm for Cloud Computing , 2013 .

[5]  P. Mell,et al.  The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing , 2011 .

[6]  Jeffrey S. Chase,et al.  Weighted fair sharing for dynamic virtual clusters , 2008, SIGMETRICS '08.

[7]  Carl Hewitt,et al.  The Scientific Community Metaphor , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  Weisong Shi,et al.  PhoenixCloud: Provisioning Resources for Heterogeneous Cloud Workloads , 2010, ArXiv.

[9]  Anindya Jyoti Pal,et al.  Design, Development and Performance Analysis of Deadline Based Priority Heuristic for Job Scheduling on a Grid , 2012 .

[10]  Dan Meng,et al.  Phoenix Cloud : Consolidating Heterogeneous Workloads of Large Organizations on Cloud Computing Platforms , 2009, ArXiv.

[11]  Yi Liang,et al.  In Cloud, Can Scientific Communities Benefit from the Economies of Scale? , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[12]  Paul Marshall,et al.  Elastic Site: Using Clouds to Elastically Extend Site Resources , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing.

[13]  P. Mell,et al.  SP 800-145. The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing , 2011 .

[14]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Evaluating the cost-benefit of using cloud computing to extend the capacity of clusters , 2009, HPDC '09.

[15]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Dynamic virtual clusters in a grid site manager , 2003, High Performance Distributed Computing, 2003. Proceedings. 12th IEEE International Symposium on.

[16]  Mohamed Othman,et al.  A priority based job scheduling algorithm in cloud computing , 2012 .

[17]  Matei Ripeanu,et al.  Amazon S3 for science grids: a viable solution? , 2008, DADC '08.