New Strategy for Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Surgery to Treat Infectious Spondylodiscitis in the Thoracolumbar Spine.

BACKGROUND Eradicating infection, protecting neurologic function, and maintaining structural alignment are the 3 objectives of treatment for infectious spondylodiscitis. For some patients, surgery may be necessary to achieve these goals; however, open surgeries are associated with high morbidity and mortality in elderly patients and those with multiple comorbidities. Endoscopic surgery provides a minimally invasive surgical option for obtaining a culture sample to aid identification of pathogens, while also providing a route for adequate decompression and drainage. The clinical results of this study were analyzed. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy and safety of spinal endoscopic surgery, the basic characteristics of patients analyzed and their inflammatory markers, pain levels, and local kyphotic angles were recorded before surgery and at regular intervals after surgery. The patients' cultured pathogens and previous antibiotic treatments were also recorded and analyzed. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective observational study (institutional review board: CMUH 105-REC2-101). SETTING Inpatient surgery center. METHODS From October 2006 to March 2017, of 508 patients who received spinal endoscopic surgery, 60 with infectious spondylodiscitis were treated using this new strategy. All 60 patients underwent plain film radiography and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the affected region to obtain evidence of infectious spondylodiscitis. The role of a computed tomography-guided biopsy and some indications for open surgery were replaced with endoscopic surgery. RESULTS All the patients reported rapid pain relief after endoscopic surgery and antibiotic treatment. No significant changes in sagittal alignment were observed in final follow-up radiography images. Causative pathogens were identified in 34 patients (culture rate: 77.27%) without previous antibiotic treatment. The patients' erythrocyte sedimentation rates and C-reactive protein levels had decreased significantly 3 months after endoscopic surgery. Two patients (3.3%) experienced infection relapse following initial endoscopic surgery; both of them were efficiently resolved through a second round of endoscopic surgery. No surgery-related complications were observed and no open spinal surgery was required during the follow-up period. LIMITATIONS This was a retrospective study; bias was unavoidable because of the single-center nature of the study design. CONCLUSIONS Regarding the culture rate, recurrence rate, kyphotic change, and surgery-related complications, this new strategy for endoscopic surgery is safe and effective for treating infectious spondylodiscitis in the thoracic or lumbar spine and may be considered a new trend in treating diseases of this type. KEY WORDS Spine, endoscopic, discectomy, spondylodiscitis, minimally invasive surgery.

[1]  Eun-Ji Choi,et al.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Debridement and Drainage with Four Different Approach Methods for the Treatment of Spinal Infection. , 2017, Pain physician.

[2]  Y. Tu,et al.  Bilateral Portal Percutaneous Endoscopic Debridement and Lavage for Lumbar Pyogenic Spondylitis. , 2015, Orthopedics.

[3]  Chun-Hao Tsai,et al.  A Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Surgery for Infectious Spondylodiscitis of the Thoracic and Upper Lumbar Spine in Immunocompromised Patients , 2015, BioMed research international.

[4]  Y. Tu,et al.  Minimally invasive endoscopic treatment for lumbar infectious spondylitis: a retrospective study in a tertiary referral center , 2014, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[5]  J. Berthelot,et al.  Pathogenesis of hyperostosis: a key role for mesenchymatous cells? , 2013, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[6]  T. Fu,et al.  Minimally invasive percutaneous endoscopic discectomy and drainage for infectious spondylodiscitis. , 2013, Biomedical journal.

[7]  M. Fantoni,et al.  Medical and surgical treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis. , 2012, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[8]  C. Stüer,et al.  Treatment of infections of the spine. , 2011, Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery.

[9]  N. Wright,et al.  The epidemiology of hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis: a cohort study in a tertiary care hospital , 2010, BMC infectious diseases.

[10]  Chaim B. Colen,et al.  Safety of instrumentation in patients with spinal infection. , 2010, Journal of Neurosurgery : Spine.

[11]  M. Fujimiya,et al.  Contribution of the anterior longitudinal ligament to ossification and growth of the vertebral body: an immunohistochemical study using the human fetal lumbar vertebrae , 2010, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[12]  D. B. Cohen,et al.  Incidence, Prevalence, and Analysis of Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection Following Adult Spinal Surgery , 2009, Spine.

[13]  V. Vougioukas,et al.  Minimally invasive dorsal percutaneous spondylodesis for the treatment of adult pyogenic spondylodiscitis , 2009, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[14]  M. Girardo,et al.  Evaluation of conservative treatment of non specific spondylodiscitis , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[15]  M. Campos,et al.  Chronic Liver Failure and Concomitant Distant Infections Are Associated With High Rates of Neurological Involvement in Pyogenic Spinal Infections , 2009, Spine.

[16]  Yin-Chih Fu,et al.  Spinal Infection in Intravenous Drug Abusers , 2007, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[17]  S. Ragot,et al.  Optimal duration of antibiotic therapy in vertebral osteomyelitis. , 2007, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[18]  A. Minami,et al.  Clinical Outcome of Posterolateral Endoscopic Surgery for Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis: Results of 15 Patients With Serious Comorbid Conditions , 2007, Spine.

[19]  M. Falagas,et al.  Clinical assessment and medical treatment of spine infections. , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  J. Piek,et al.  Nonspecific pyogenic spondylodiscitis: clinical manifestations, surgical treatment, and outcome in 24 patients. , 2004, Neurosurgical focus.

[21]  P. Weinstein,et al.  General principles in the medical and surgical management of spinal infections: a multidisciplinary approach. , 2004, Neurosurgical focus.

[22]  P. Millner,et al.  Therapeutic impact of percutaneous spinal biopsy in spinal infection , 2004, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[23]  H. Andress,et al.  Surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis. , 2003, Surgical infections.

[24]  P. Ravaud,et al.  Management of nontuberculous infectious discitis. treatments used in 110 patients admitted to 12 teaching hospitals in France. , 2001, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[25]  F. S. Chew,et al.  Diagnostic yield of CT-guided percutaneous aspiration procedures in suspected spontaneous infectious diskitis. , 2001, Radiology.

[26]  G. Adam,et al.  Spondylodiskitic abscesses: CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage. , 1998, Radiology.

[27]  C. O. Solberg,et al.  Vertebral osteomyelitis at a Norwegian university hospital 1987-97: clinical features, laboratory findings and outcome. , 1998, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases.

[28]  A. Hadjipavlou,et al.  Percutaneous transpedicular discectomy and drainage in pyogenic spondylodiscitis. , 1998, American journal of orthopedics.

[29]  R. Delamarter,et al.  Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis and postsurgical disc space infections. , 1996, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[30]  M. Ray,et al.  Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. , 1985, Orthopedics.

[31]  H. Yuan,et al.  Management and outcome of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. , 1978, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.