Adherence monitoring of rehabilitation exercise with inertial sensors: A clinical validation study.

BACKGROUND Rehabilitation has an established role in the management of a wide range of musculoskeletal conditions. Much of this treatment relies on self-directed exercises at home, where adherence of execution is unknown. Demonstrating treatment fidelity is necessary to draw conclusions about the efficacy of rehabilitation interventions in both clinical and research settings. There is a lack of tools and methods to achieve this. RESEARCH QUESTION This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using a single inertial sensor to recognise and classify shoulder rehabilitation activity using supervised machine learning techniques. METHODS Twenty patients with shoulder pain were monitored performing five rehabilitation exercises routinely prescribed for their condition. Accelerometer, gyroscope and magnetometer data were collected via a device mounted onto an arm sleeve. Non-specific motion data was included in the analysis. Time and frequency domain features were calculated from labelled data segments and ranked in terms of their predictive importance using the ReliefF algorithm. Selected features were used to train four supervised learning algorithms: decision tree, k-nearest neighbour, support vector machine and random forests. Performance of algorithms in accurately classifying exercise activity was evaluated with ten-fold cross-validation and leave-one-subject-out-validation methods. RESULTS Optimal predictive accuracies for ten-fold cross-validation (97.2%) and leave-one-subject-out-validation (80.5%) were achieved by support vector machine and random forests algorithms, respectively. Time domain features derived from accelerometer, magnetometer and orientation data streams were shown to have the highest predictive value for classifying rehabilitation activity. SIGNIFICANCE Classification models performed well in differentiating patient exercise activity from non-specific movement and identifying specific exercise type using inertial sensor data. A clinically useful account of home rehabilitation activity will help guide treatment strategies and facilitate methods to improve patient engagement. Future work should focus on evaluating the performance of such systems in natural and unsupervised settings.

[1]  A. Timmermans,et al.  Interactive wearable systems for upper body rehabilitation: a systematic review , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[2]  William Johnston,et al.  Wearable Inertial Sensor Systems for Lower Limb Exercise Detection and Evaluation: A Systematic Review , 2018, Sports Medicine.

[3]  Ifeyinwa E. Achumba,et al.  Monitoring: Taxonomy of Issues, Techniques, Applications, Challenges and Limitations , 2013 .

[4]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  Exploring semi-supervised and active learning for activity recognition , 2008, 2008 12th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[5]  S. Dean,et al.  A systematic review of measures of self-reported adherence to unsupervised home-based rehabilitation exercise programmes, and their psychometric properties , 2014, BMJ Open.

[6]  Isabelle Guyon,et al.  An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[7]  Brian Caulfield,et al.  Rehabilitation exercise assessment using inertial sensors: a cross-sectional analytical study , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[8]  K. Storheim,et al.  Musculoskeletal disorders and the Global Burden of Disease study , 2014, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[9]  Álvaro Herrero,et al.  Features and models for human activity recognition , 2015, Neurocomputing.

[10]  Eliathamby Ambikairajah,et al.  Classification of a known sequence of motions and postures from accelerometry data using adapted Gaussian mixture models. , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[11]  Annick Timmermans,et al.  Motion detection supported exercise therapy in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. , 2018, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[12]  Daniel Borrajo,et al.  A dynamic sliding window approach for activity recognition , 2011, UMAP'11.

[13]  Sandra Bassett,et al.  The assessment of patient adherence to physiotherapy rehabilitation , 2003 .

[14]  Evelyne Klinger,et al.  Barriers to home-based exercise program adherence with chronic low back pain: Patient expectations regarding new technologies. , 2016, Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[15]  Diego Torricelli,et al.  Quantitative assessment based on kinematic measures of functional impairments during upper extremity movements: A review. , 2014, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  Faicel Chamroukhi,et al.  Physical Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors , 2015, Sensors.

[17]  Meng Li,et al.  A Random Forest-based ensemble method for activity recognition , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[18]  Chao Sima,et al.  Performance of Feature Selection Methods , 2009, Current genomics.

[19]  Annick Timmermans,et al.  Shoulder assessment according to the international classification of functioning by means of inertial sensor technologies: A systematic review. , 2017, Gait & posture.

[20]  H. Dawes,et al.  What interventions are used to improve exercise adherence in older people and what behavioural techniques are they based on? A systematic review , 2017, BMJ Open.

[21]  A. Plamondon,et al.  Optimization of inertial sensor-based motion capturing for magnetically distorted field applications. , 2014, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  C. Terwee,et al.  Effectiveness of exercise therapy: a best-evidence summary of systematic reviews. , 2005, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[23]  Hsueh-Chun Lin,et al.  An Activity Recognition Model Using Inertial Sensor Nodes in a Wireless Sensor Network for Frozen Shoulder Rehabilitation Exercises , 2015, Sensors.

[24]  Patrick Henry,et al.  Shoulder physiotherapy exercise recognition: machine learning the inertial signals from a smartwatch , 2018, Physiological measurement.

[25]  Héctor Pomares,et al.  Window Size Impact in Human Activity Recognition , 2014, Sensors.

[26]  Kirsten Jack,et al.  Barriers to treatment adherence in physiotherapy outpatient clinics: A systematic review , 2010, Manual therapy.