Efficacy of penicillin for dental pain without overt infection.

OBJECTIVES Dental pain is a common presenting symptom in the acute care setting. Even in the absence of overt infection, many physicians routinely prescribe antibiotics such as penicillin. The authors sought to test the hypothesis that penicillin is not necessary or beneficial in the treatment of undifferentiated dental pain without overt infection. METHODS This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at an urban teaching hospital with approximately 105,000 emergency department visits per year. A convenience sample of adult emergency department patients presenting with dental pain and no clinically overt infection was randomized to receive penicillin or placebo. A structured evaluation was performed at enrollment and again at a 5- to 7-day follow-up visit. The main outcome measure was evidence of overt dental infection at the 5- to 7-day follow-up visit. RESULTS A total of 195 patients were enrolled. Ninety-eight (50%) were randomized to treatment with penicillin. A total of 125 patients (64%) were followed up. Outcome data were identified for nine additional study patients, who returned to the dental clinic or emergency department outside of the scheduled follow-up period and were included in the final analysis. Overall, 13 of 134 patients (9%) developed signs of infection: six of 64 (9%) from the penicillin group and seven of 70 (10%) from the placebo group (p = 0.90). There was no significant difference between the penicillin and placebo groups in baseline characteristics, medication compliance, or visual analog scale pain scores at enrollment. CONCLUSIONS These data support the hypothesis that penicillin is neither necessary nor beneficial in the treatment of undifferentiated dental pain in the absence of overt infection.

[1]  C. Hwang,et al.  Cavernous sinus thrombosis following odontogenic and cervicofacial infection , 1991, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[2]  B. Johnston,et al.  Dental complaints in emergency departments: a national perspective. , 2003, Annals of emergency medicine.

[3]  M. Martín,et al.  Therapeutics: Are antibiotics being used appropriately for emergency dental treatment? , 2001, British Dental Journal.

[4]  A. Neugut,et al.  Anaphylaxis in the United States: an investigation into its epidemiology. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[5]  L. Calder,et al.  therapeutics: Antibiotic prescribing for dental conditions: general medical practitioners and dentists compared , 2000, British Dental Journal.

[6]  N. Ergül,et al.  Grievances in cases using antibiotics due to orodental problems and assessment of the need for antibiotics. , 2000, International dental journal.

[7]  J. Shepherd,et al.  Antibiotic prescription for acute dental conditions in the primary care setting , 1996, British Dental Journal.

[8]  R. Walton,et al.  Penicillin as a supplement in resolving the localized acute apical abscess. , 1996, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[9]  P. C. Ferrera,et al.  Uncommon complications of odontogenic infections. , 1996, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[10]  M. Dinubile Septic thrombosis of the cavernous sinuses. , 1988, Archives of neurology.

[11]  D. Morse,et al.  Infectious flare-ups and serious sequelae following endodontic treatment: a prospective randomized trial on efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in cases of asymptomatic pulpal-periapical lesions. , 1987, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[12]  J. Trobe,et al.  Septic cavernous sinus thrombosis associated with gingivitis and parapharyngeal abscess. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.

[13]  K. S. Oliver,et al.  Thrombophlebitis of the cavernous sinus originating from acute dental infection; cure with penicillin. , 1948, Archives of otolaryngology.