Coached Mobile App Platform for the Treatment of Depression and Anxiety Among Primary Care Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance Depression and anxiety are common and disabling. Primary care is the de facto site for treating these mental health problems but is typically underresourced to meet the burden of these demands. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a mobile intervention platform, IntelliCare, for addressing depression and anxiety among primary care patients. Design, Setting, and Participants Two-arm randomized clinical trial at internal medicine clinics at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. Adult primary care patients (N = 146) who screened positive for depression on the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ; score  ≥ 10) or anxiety on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; score ≥ 8) were recruited between July 17, 2018, and December 14, 2018. Interventions The coach-supported platform composed of a suite of apps, was delivered over 8 weeks. Wait list control participants received treatment as usual for 8 weeks, then the mobile platform. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were changes in depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7) during the intervention period. Secondary outcomes were differences in the proportion of patients who achieved recovery (PHQ-9/GAD-7 <5 or 50% improvement from baseline), sustainment of intervention effects during 2-month follow-up, and app use during the intervention period. Results One hundred forty-six patients were included (119 of 146 were women [81.5%]; mean [SD] age, 42.3 [13.8] years). Of the 146 patients, 122 (83.6%) were diagnosed as having depression and 131 (89.7%) were diagnosed as having anxiety. A greater proportion of intervention vs wait list control participants achieved recovery from depression (n = 38 of 64 [59%] vs n = 18 of 58 [31%]; odds ratio, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.54-6.86) and anxiety (n = 37 of 65 [57%] vs n = 25 of 66 [38%]; odds ratio, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.08-4.36). Sustained effects were observed for depression (slope, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.10; P = .92) and anxiety scores (slope, 0.02; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.12; P = .67) during follow-up. App use was high, with a median of 93 and 98 sessions among participants with depression and anxiety, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance In this trial, a mobile intervention app was effective for depression and anxiety among primary care patients. Findings also support designing digital mental health interventions as platforms containing simple, brief apps that can be bundled by users to meet their needs. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03500536.

[1]  Susan M. Kaiser,et al.  Lessons learned from service design of a trial of a digital mental health service: Informing implementation in primary care clinics. , 2020, Translational behavioral medicine.

[2]  H. Kraemer Is It Time to Ban the P Value? , 2019, JAMA psychiatry.

[3]  Ashley A. Knapp,et al.  Clinically Meaningful Use of Mental Health Apps and its Effects on Depression: Mixed Methods Study , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  Andrea K. Graham,et al.  Experimental Therapeutics for Digital Mental Health. , 2019, JAMA psychiatry.

[5]  Amit Baumel,et al.  Objective User Engagement With Mental Health Apps: Systematic Search and Panel-Based Usage Analysis , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[6]  Susan M. Kaiser,et al.  Comparison of the Effects of Coaching and Receipt of App Recommendations on Depression, Anxiety, and Engagement in the IntelliCare Platform: Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  M. Peterson,et al.  US National and State-Level Prevalence of Mental Health Disorders and Disparities of Mental Health Care Use in Children , 2019, JAMA pediatrics.

[8]  J. Stinson,et al.  A Library of Analytic Indicators to Evaluate Effective Engagement with Consumer mHealth Apps for Chronic Conditions: Scoping Review , 2019, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[9]  E. Chiauzzi,et al.  Mental Health Apps in Psychiatric Treatment: A Patient Perspective on Real World Technology Usage , 2019, JMIR mental health.

[10]  D. Mohr,et al.  Exploring the Use of Multiple Mental Health Apps Within a Platform: Secondary Analysis of the IntelliCare Field Trial , 2018, JMIR mental health.

[11]  G. Andrews,et al.  Computer therapy for the anxiety and depression disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: An updated meta-analysis. , 2018, Journal of anxiety disorders.

[12]  B. Grant,et al.  Epidemiology of Adult DSM-5 Major Depressive Disorder and Its Specifiers in the United States , 2018, JAMA psychiatry.

[13]  M. Hautzinger,et al.  The association between adherence and outcome in an Internet intervention for depression. , 2018, Journal of affective disorders.

[14]  Heleen Riper,et al.  A Solution-Focused Research Approach to Achieve an Implementable Revolution in Digital Mental Health , 2017, JAMA psychiatry.

[15]  Michael B. Spring,et al.  Effectiveness of Online Collaborative Care for Treating Mood and Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care , 2017, JAMA psychiatry.

[16]  John Torous,et al.  The efficacy of smartphone‐based mental health interventions for depressive symptoms: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2017, World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association.

[17]  Hannah T. Boettcher,et al.  The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders Compared With Diagnosis-Specific Protocols for Anxiety Disorders: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2017, JAMA psychiatry.

[18]  John Torous,et al.  Can smartphone mental health interventions reduce symptoms of anxiety? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2017, Journal of affective disorders.

[19]  R. Araya,et al.  Telephone-supported computerised cognitive–behavioural therapy: REEACT-2 large-scale pragmatic randomised controlled trial , 2017, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[20]  Aaron R Lyon,et al.  Accelerating Digital Mental Health Research From Early Design and Creation to Successful Implementation and Sustainment , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[21]  Dan J Stein,et al.  Cross-sectional Comparison of the Epidemiology of DSM-5 Generalized Anxiety Disorder Across the Globe , 2017, JAMA psychiatry.

[22]  Madhu Reddy,et al.  Three Problems With Current Digital Mental Health Research . . . and Three Things We Can Do About Them. , 2017, Psychiatric services.

[23]  Rebecca C Rossom,et al.  IntelliCare: An Eclectic, Skills-Based App Suite for the Treatment of Depression and Anxiety , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[24]  Mark Olfson,et al.  Treatment of Adult Depression in the United States. , 2016, JAMA internal medicine.

[25]  H. van Marwijk,et al.  Collaborative care for anxiety disorders in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, BMC Family Practice.

[26]  M. Phipps,et al.  Screening for Depression in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. , 2016, JAMA.

[27]  Ricardo Araya,et al.  Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) as treatment for depression in primary care (REEACT trial): large scale pragmatic randomised controlled trial , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  David A. Ellis,et al.  Beyond Self-Report: Tools to Compare Estimated and Real-World Smartphone Use , 2015, PloS one.

[29]  Gerhard Andersson,et al.  Psychological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a meta-analysis. , 2014, Clinical psychology review.

[30]  Barbara Stanley,et al.  The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. , 2011, The American journal of psychiatry.

[31]  Bruce Neal,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[32]  Adam A. Lewis,et al.  Multimodal E-Mental Health Treatment for Depression: A Feasibility Trial , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[33]  Joyce Ho,et al.  Perceived barriers to psychological treatments and their relationship to depression. , 2010, Journal of clinical psychology.

[34]  B. Gaynes,et al.  Screening for Depression in Adult Patients in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Evidence Review , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[35]  H. Christensen,et al.  Adherence in Internet Interventions for Anxiety and Depression: Systematic Review , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[36]  T. Strine,et al.  The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. , 2009, Journal of affective disorders.

[37]  P. Cuijpers,et al.  Characteristics of effective psychological treatments of depression: a metaregression analysis , 2008, Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research.

[38]  D. Mohr,et al.  Barriers to psychotherapy among depressed and nondepressed primary care patients , 2006, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[39]  Alex J Sutton,et al.  Collaborative care for depression: a cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[40]  B. Löwe,et al.  A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[41]  Martin Knapp,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: Randomised controlled trial , 2004, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[42]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The PHQ-9 , 2001, Journal of General Internal Medicine.