Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patients

Seventy-four acutely ill patients were treated with intravenous ciprofloxacin at dosages ranging between 200 mg every 12 h and 400 mg every 8 h. A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis relating drug exposure (and other factors) to infectious outcome was performed. Plasma samples were obtained and assayed for ciprofloxacin by high-performance liquid chromatography. Samples from patients were frequently cultured so that the day of bacterial eradication could be determined. The pharmacokinetic data were fitted by iterative two-stage analysis, assuming a linear two-compartment model. Logistic regression was used to model ciprofloxacin exposure (and other potential covariates) versus the probabilities of achieving clinical and microbiologic cures. The same variables were also modelled versus the time to bacterial eradication by proportional hazards regression. The independent variables considered were dose, site of infection, infecting organism and the MIC for it, percent time above the MIC, peak, peak/MIC ratio, trough, trough/MIC ratio, 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), AUC/MIC ratio (AUIC), presence of other active antibacterial agents, and patient characteristics. The most important predictor for all three measures of ciprofloxacin pharmacodynamics was the AUIC. A 24-h AUIC of 125 SIT-1.h (inverse serum inhibitory titer integrated over time) was found to be a significant breakpoint for probabilities of both clinical and microbiologic cures. At an AUIC below 125 (19 patients), the percent probabilities of clinical and microbiologic cures were 42 and 26%, respectively. At an AUIC above 125 (45 patients), the probabilities were 80% (P < 0.005) and 82% (P < 0.001), respectively. There were two significant breakpoints in the time-to-bacterial-eradication data. At an AUIC below 125 (21 patients), the median time to eradication exceeded 32 days; at an AUIC of 125 to 250 (15 patients), time to eradication was 6.6 days: and at AUIC above 250 (28 patients), the median time to eradication was 1.9 days (groups differed; P < 0.005). These findings, when combined with pharmacokinetic data reported in the companion article, provide the rationale and tools needed for targeting the dosage of intravenous ciprofloxacin to individual patients' pharmacokinetics and their bacterial pathogens' susceptibilities. An a priori dosing algorithm (based on MIC, patient creatine clearance and weight, and the clinician-specified AUIC target) was developed. This approach was shown, retrospectively, to be more precise than current guidelines, and it can be used to achieve more rapid bacteriologic and clinical responses to ciprofloxacin, as a consequence of targeting the AUIC.

[1]  R. Auckenthaler,et al.  Combination therapy: a way to limit emergence of resistance? , 1986, The American journal of medicine.

[2]  R. Chaisson,et al.  Infectious complications with respiratory pathogens despite ciprofloxacin therapy. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Jerome J. Schentag,et al.  Dual individualization of intravenous ciprofloxacin in patients with nosocomial lower respiratory tract infections. , 1987, The American journal of medicine.

[4]  H. Neu,et al.  The inhibitory quotient. A method for interpreting minimum inhibitory concentration data. , 1981, JAMA.

[5]  H. Neu Bacterial resistance to fluoroquinolones. , 1988, Reviews of infectious diseases.

[6]  I. L. Smith,et al.  Role for dual individualization with cefmenoxime. , 1984, The American journal of medicine.

[7]  Jerome J. Schentag,et al.  Antibiotic tissue penetration and its relevance: impact of tissue penetration on infection response , 1991, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[8]  L. Peterson,et al.  Ciprofloxacin, azlocillin, ceftizoxime and amikacin alone and in combination against gram-negative bacilli in an infected chamber model. , 1986, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[9]  P. Gerner-Smidt,et al.  Analysis of the interaction between piperacillin and ciprofloxacin or tobramycin against thirteen strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, using killing curves. , 2009, Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology.

[10]  J F Boisvieux,et al.  Alternative approaches to estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters: comparison with the nonlinear mixed-effect model. , 1984, Drug metabolism reviews.

[11]  Dan Steinberg,et al.  Survival: A Supplementary Module for SYSTAT , 1989 .

[12]  J. S. Wolfson,et al.  SERUM BACTERICIDAL ACTIVITY AS A MONITOR OF ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY , 1985 .

[13]  T. Rogers,et al.  A randomized trial of ciprofloxacin plus azlocillin versus netilmicin plus azlocillin for the empirical treatment of fever in neutropenic patients. , 1991, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[14]  H. Neu,et al.  ORAL CIPROFLOXACIN THERAPY OF INFECTIONS DUE TO PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA , 1986, The Lancet.

[15]  S. Barriere,et al.  Analysis of a new method for assessing activity of combinations of antimicrobials: area under the bactericidal activity curve. , 1985, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[16]  R. Goering,et al.  Overview of preclinical studies with ciprofloxacin. , 1987, The American journal of medicine.

[17]  D. Hooper,et al.  Bacterial resistance to quinolones: mechanisms and clinical importance. , 1989, Reviews of infectious diseases.

[18]  Jerome J. Schentag,et al.  Liquid-chromatographic determination of ciprofloxacin in serum and urine. , 1985, Clinical chemistry.

[19]  Jerome J. Schentag,et al.  Antibiotic tissue penetration and its relevance: models of tissue penetration and their meaning , 1991, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[20]  Jerome J. Schentag Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Tissue Penetration , 1989, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[21]  H. Koornhof,et al.  Antimicrobial activity of ciprofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus determined by the killing curve method: antibiotic comparisons and synergistic interactions , 1985, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[22]  R. Jelliffe,et al.  A computer program for estimation of creatinine clearance from unstable serum creatinine levels, age, sex, and weight , 1972 .

[23]  M. Bergeron The pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of the fluoroquinolones. , 1989, Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale.

[24]  C. Stratton,et al.  Comparison of the bactericidal activity of ciprofloxacin alone and in combination with selected antipseudomonal beta-lactam agents against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 1988, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[25]  G. Eliopoulos,et al.  In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin, a new carboxyquinoline antimicrobial agent , 1984, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[26]  Jerome J. Schentag Correlation of pharmacokinetic parameters to efficacy of antibiotics: relationships between serum concentrations, MIC values, and bacterial eradication in patients with gram-negative pneumonia. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases. Supplementum.

[27]  A. Gerber,et al.  Antibiotic therapy of infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in normal and granulocytopenic mice: comparison of murine and human pharmacokinetics. , 1986, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[28]  J. Righter Ciprofloxacin treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections. , 1987, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[29]  O. Cars Pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in tissues and tissue fluids: a review. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases. Supplementum.

[30]  Jerome J. Schentag,et al.  Dose-Ranging Pharmacokinetic Study of Ciprofloxacin after 200-, 300-, and 400-mg Intravenous Doses , 1992, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[31]  Jerome J. Schentag,et al.  Development of a population pharmacokinetic model and optimal sampling strategies for intravenous ciprofloxacin , 1993, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[32]  Jerome J. Schentag,et al.  Mathematical Examination of Dual Individualization Principles (I): Relationships between AUC above MIC and Area under the Inhibitory Curve for Cefmenoxime, Ciprofloxacin, and Tobramycin , 1991, DICP : the annals of pharmacotherapy.