The operation of existing activated sludge treatment plants at paper mills in the world is often characterized by disturbances, caused by bad biosolids settling, sludge bulking, and reduction of biomass activity. This paper presents a comparison between the results obtained in a case study based on a full-scale activated sludge treatment (AST) system working as the only biotreatment and the AST working with anaerobic pretreatment by upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB). The study was performed at paper mills in Hedera, Israel. The data was collected during 8 years. The anaerobic/aerobic system (2002–2004) provided steady operation performance, while the AST system without anaerobic pretreatment (1997–2001) produced effluent characterized by oscillatory values. The results indicate much lower levels of total suspended solids in the anaerobic/aerobic treatment system effluent, 5–10 mg/L, compared to 50–85 mg/L in the AST system only. Similar improvement was observed in terms of the organic matter removal:...
[1]
T. Welander,et al.
In-Mill Biological Treatment for Paper Mill Closure
,
1999
.
[2]
C. W. Walter.
Finding a better way.
,
1990,
JAMA.
[3]
I. Ozturk,et al.
Feasibility of Anaerobic Pre-Treatment for the Effluents from Hardboard and Laminated Board Industry
,
1994
.
[4]
Gatze Lettinga,et al.
Sequenced Anaerobic-Aerobic Treatment of Hemp Black Liquors
,
1994
.
[5]
M. Richard.
ACTIVATED SLUDGE MICROBIOLOGY PROBLEMS AND THEIR CONTROL
,
2003
.
[6]
L. Ingman,et al.
IMPROVED CONTROL MAKES ACTIVATED SLUDGE TREATMENT MORE VIABLE
,
1998
.