Understanding institutional capacity for urban water transitions

Transitions management (TM) is emerging as an approach to governing complex sustainability problems. Critiques point to the need to understand dynamics of system change, particularly, with regard to actor agency at micro and meso scales. This paper begins to address this scholarly gap by first, developing an analytical framework of the institutional context of a transition that recognizes forms of agency. Second, a method to apply the framework to empirical cases of urban water socio-technical systems to map their institutional context is developed. The results revealed: i) ways to identify problematic features of current systems and underlying cognitive and normative frames, to assist with envisioning and transition pathway development, ii) a method of system analysis that can target leverage points for strategizing transitions agendas and experiments, and iii) a dynamic description of the system to assist with evaluating TM interventions and monitoring transitions. By providing a systems analysis cognizant of contextual dynamics and targeted to the knowledge needs of TM activities, this analytical tool shows promise for improving TM through further empirical application and research.

[1]  Patrice Garin,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Implementing Participatory Water Management: Recent Advances in Theory, Practice and Evaluation Supporting the Shift from State Water to Community Water: Lessons from a Social Learning Approach to Designing Joint Irrigation Projects in Morocco , 2009 .

[2]  E. Ostrom Understanding Institutional Diversity , 2005 .

[3]  Kathleen M. Quinlan,et al.  Bridging the Research-Practice Gap , 2007 .

[4]  van den Margo Brink,et al.  The Adaptive Capacity Wheel: a method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society , 2010 .

[5]  L Werbeloff,et al.  Security through diversity: moving from rhetoric to practice. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[6]  Rebekah R. Brown,et al.  Towards understanding governance for sustainable urban water management. , 2011 .

[7]  V. Ambrosini,et al.  Tacit Knowledge: Some Suggestions for Operationalization , 2001 .

[8]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management , 2009 .

[9]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[10]  Steven Katz,et al.  Concept mapping methodology: A catalyst for organizational learning , 2005 .

[11]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Analyzing complex water governance regimes: the Management and Transition Framework , 2010 .

[12]  F J de Haan,et al.  Water scarcity and institutional change: lessons in adaptive governance from the drought experience of Perth, Western Australia. , 2013, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[13]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[14]  Banny Banerjee,et al.  Tipping Toward Sustainability: Emerging Pathways of Transformation , 2011, AMBIO.

[15]  Niki Frantzeskaki,et al.  Guidance manual: Key steps for implementing a strategic planning process for transformative change , 2012 .

[16]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources , 2012 .

[17]  Rebekah R. Brown,et al.  Governance experimentation and factors of success in socio-technical transitions in the urban water sector , 2012 .

[18]  F. Geels,et al.  Multi-dimensional struggles in the greening of industry: A dialectic issue lifecycle model and case study , 2012 .

[19]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[20]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on New Methods for Adaptive Water Management Adaptive Water Governance: Assessing the Institutional Prescriptions of Adaptive (Co-)Management from a Governance Perspective and Defining a Research Agenda , 2009 .

[21]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Social Learning and Water Resources Management , 2007 .

[22]  Kenneth W. Abbott,et al.  Navigating the Anthropocene: Improving Earth System Governance , 2012, Science.

[23]  S. Clegg The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies , 2006 .

[24]  T. Lawrence,et al.  Institutional Work: Refocusing Institutional Studies of Organization , 2011 .

[25]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Navigating the Back Loop: Fostering Social Innovation and Transformation in Ecosystem Management , 2010 .

[26]  J. Voss,et al.  Reflexive governance for sustainable development , 2006 .

[27]  P. Jagger,et al.  The Contribution of Institutional Theories to Explaining Decentralization of Natural Resource Governance , 2008 .

[28]  D. Loorbach Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework , 2010 .

[29]  John M. Anderies,et al.  Insight, part of a Special Feature on Exploring Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems Fifteen Weddings and a Funeral: Case Studies and Resilience- based Management , 2006 .

[30]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[31]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[32]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[33]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Social Learning in Water Resources Management Social Learning in European River-Basin Management: Barriers and Fostering Mechanisms from 10 River Basins , 2007 .

[34]  E. Shove Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change , 2010 .

[35]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Ecosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[36]  T. Lawrence,et al.  Institutions and Institutional Work , 2006 .

[37]  Flor Avelino,et al.  Empowerment and the challenge of applying transition management to ongoing projects , 2009 .

[38]  Alberto J. Cañas,et al.  A TEORIA SUBJACENTE AOS MAPAS CONCEITUAIS E COMO ELABORÁ-LOS E USÁ-LOS * THE THEORY UNDERLYING CONCEPT MAPS AND HOW TO CONSTRUCT AND USE THEM , 2010 .

[39]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Decision-making under great uncertainty: environmental management in an era of global change. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[40]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[41]  R. Stake Qualitative Case Studies. , 2005 .

[42]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Insight, part of a Special Feature on Exploring Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems Shooting the Rapids: Navigating Transitions to Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems , 2006 .

[43]  Rebekah R. Brown,et al.  Rethinking urban water management: Experimentation as a way forward? , 2011 .

[44]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[45]  Niki Frantzeskaki,et al.  Governing societal transitions to sustainability , 2012 .

[46]  John Bohannon,et al.  Running Out of Water--and Time , 2006, Science.

[47]  D. Loorbach Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[48]  J. Rotmans,et al.  The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases , 2010 .

[49]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[50]  N. Marshall,et al.  Informing adaptation responses to climate change through theories of transformation , 2012 .