The diffusion of marketing science in the practitioners' community: opening the black box

SUMMARY This editorial discusses an illustration of the potential hindrances to the diffusion of modern methodologies in the practitioners’ (i.e. the buyers of research, not the consultants) community. Taking the example of classical regression analysis based on store-level scanner data, the authors discuss the potential limitations of the classical regression model, with the example of the occurrence of ‘wrong’ signs and of coefficients with unexpected magnitudes. In an interview with one of the authors, a (randomly picked) Senior Marketing Research Manager at a leading firm of packaged goods reports his/her experience with econometric models. To him/her, econometric models are presented as a ‘black box’ (his/her written words). In his/her experience, they provided results that were ‘quite good’ in a ‘much focused’ context only. There were experimental data obtained with a Latin square design and the analysis included a single brand with only four stock-keeping units (SKUs). The company ‘dropped’ the more ‘ambitious’ studies, which analysed the effect of the retail promotions run by all the actors in a market because of a lack of predictive accuracy (his/her written words are in quotes). The authors suggest that Bayesian methodology can help open the black box and obtain more acceptable results than those obtained at present. Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity , 1998 .

[2]  Jacques H. Dreze,et al.  Bayesian regression analysis using poly-t densities , 1977 .

[3]  J. Kadane,et al.  Experiences in elicitation , 1998 .

[4]  Pradeep Chintagunta,et al.  Investigating the Effects of Store-Brand Introduction on Retailer Demand and Pricing Behavior , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[5]  A. Zellner An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics , 1971 .

[6]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Statistics and Marketing , 2000 .

[7]  Dick R. Wittink,et al.  Varying parameter models to accommodate dynamic promotion effects , 1998 .

[8]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  The Value of Purchase History Data in Target Marketing , 1996 .

[9]  Sunil Gupta,et al.  Commercial Use of UPC Scanner Data: Industry and Academic Perspectives , 1999 .

[10]  P. Lenk,et al.  Hierarchical Bayes Conjoint Analysis: Recovery of Partworth Heterogeneity from Reduced Experimental Designs , 1996 .

[11]  Paul D. Berger,et al.  Business school research: bridging the gap between producers and consumers , 2002 .

[12]  Udo Wagner,et al.  A Multiple-Item Model of Paired Comparisons: Separating Chance from Latent Preference , 2000 .

[13]  P. Cartwright,et al.  The Statistical Properties of the Equity Estimator , 1994 .

[14]  D. Wittink,et al.  Building Models for Marketing Decisions , 2000 .

[15]  E. George,et al.  Shrinkage Estimation of Price and Promotional Elasticities: Seemingly Unrelated Equations , 1991 .

[16]  J. Farley,et al.  How Advertising Affects Sales: Meta-Analysis of Econometric Results , 1984 .

[17]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Modeling large data sets in marketing , 2001 .

[18]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Bayesian Statistics and Marketing , 2005 .

[19]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Estimating Price Elasticities with Theory-Based Priors , 1999 .

[20]  Donald G. Morrison,et al.  A Latent Look at Empirical Generalizations , 1995 .

[21]  Steven M. Shugan Editorial: Consulting, Research, and Consulting Research , 2004 .

[22]  Sylvia Richardson,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1997 .

[23]  R. Merton The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action , 1936 .

[24]  F. Bass A Simultaneous Equation Regression Study of Advertising and Sales of Cigarettes , 1969 .

[25]  M. Keane Modeling Heterogeneity and State Dependence in Consumer Choice Behavior , 1997 .

[26]  V. Srinivasan,et al.  The Asymmetric Share Effect: An Empirical Generalization on Cross-Price Effects , 2002 .

[27]  R. L. Winkler,et al.  Separating probability elicitation from utilities , 1988 .

[28]  G. Tellis The Price Elasticity of Selective Demand: A Meta-Analysis of Econometric Models of Sales , 1988 .