Effect of Food Intake on Pharmacokinetics of Oral Almonertinib: A Randomized Crossover Trial in Healthy Chinese Participants

The third‐generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) almonertinib (HS‐10296) targets both EGFR‐sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations. This randomized, open‐label, two‐period crossover trial investigated the effect of food intake on the single‐dose pharmacokinetic properties of almonertinib and its metabolite HAS‐719. Twenty healthy adults received a single dose of almonertinib tablets (110 mg) on days 1 and 22 under overnight fasting or fed conditions, respectively. Plasma samples were collected 216 hours post‐dosing and almonertinib and HAS‐719 concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry. For almonertinib, the geometric mean ratio (GMR, fed/fasting) and 90% confidence interval (CI) for the area under the curve (AUC) from time 0 to 216 hours and apparent oral clearance (CLz/F) were 119.9 (110.0–130.7) and 83.5 (76.6–90.9), respectively. Fasting and fed groups showed significant differences in these parameters, but not for maximum concentration (Cmax) and time to Cmax (Tmax). The Cmax GMR of HAS‐719 was 81.7 (75.8–88.0), which decreased significantly in the fed group. The drug‐related adverse reaction (AR) incidence was similar in the two groups, 50% in the fasting group and 52.6% in the fed group. ARs were mainly gastrointestinal diseases and abnormal laboratory test results, and all participants fully recovered. In conclusion, a high‐fat diet slightly affected the pharmacokinetic profile of almonertinib in healthy participants, but not the safety tolerance. Therefore, almonertinib is suitable for administration under fasting or fed conditions.

[1]  Xiaoyan Chen,et al.  Itraconazole and rifampicin, as CYP3A modulators but not P-gp modulators, affect the pharmacokinetics of almonertinib and active metabolite HAS-719 in healthy volunteers , 2021, Acta Pharmacologica Sinica.

[2]  Wei Liu,et al.  Absorption, metabolism, excretion, and safety of [14C]almonertinib in healthy Chinese subjects , 2021, Annals of translational medicine.

[3]  C. Chiu,et al.  Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Almonertinib (HS-10296) in Pretreated Patients with EGFR-mutated Advanced NSCLC: a Multicenter, Open-label, Phase I Trial. , 2020, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[4]  J. Ahn,et al.  Lazertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the dose escalation and dose expansion parts of a first-in-human, open-label, multicentre, phase 1-2 study. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  A. Drilon,et al.  Optimizing the sequencing of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). , 2019, Lung cancer.

[6]  P. V. Van Schil,et al.  Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  R. Plummer,et al.  The Effect of Food or Omeprazole on the Pharmacokinetics of Osimertinib in Patients With Non‐Small‐Cell Lung Cancer and in Healthy Volunteers , 2018, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[8]  Ying Cheng,et al.  Osimertinib in Untreated EGFR‐Mutated Advanced Non–Small‐Cell Lung Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  B. Han,et al.  First-line icotinib versus cisplatin/pemetrexed plus pemetrexed maintenance therapy for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (CONVINCE): a phase 3, open-label, randomized study , 2017, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[10]  L. Sequist,et al.  First‐Line Afatinib versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer and Common Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutations and Brain Metastases , 2016, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[11]  S Senan,et al.  Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  S. Temin,et al.  Systemic Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. , 2016, Journal of oncology practice / American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  B. Han,et al.  First-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: analyses from the phase III, randomized, open-label, ENSURE study. , 2015, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[14]  P. Jänne,et al.  AZD9291 in EGFR inhibitor-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  L. Sequist,et al.  Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[16]  William Pao,et al.  Analysis of Tumor Specimens at the Time of Acquired Resistance to EGFR-TKI Therapy in 155 Patients with EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancers , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[17]  S. Digumarthy,et al.  Genotypic and Histological Evolution of Lung Cancers Acquiring Resistance to EGFR Inhibitors , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.